-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/01/28/social-media-revolt/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
9 hours ago · 108 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
5 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Redbox: The Enemy of the Entertainment Industry? [STUDY]
1 hour ago · 7 comments
-
Holiday Mojo: What Kind of Seasonal Twitter User Are You?
3 hours ago · 13 comments
-
REVEALED: Details on YouTube’s VEVO Music Video Site
2 hours ago · 9 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Companies and web sites can't act in a silo anymore. They need to be more human if they want to gain any ground in a social arena.
Thanks for sharing this! Nice to see there are still companies out there that are willing to accept a little egg on their face. It can wash right off anyway...good show!
Good job. Hi five.
I'm hard at work on a startup that will be launching soon and this is exactly the kind of stuff my team and I need to hear. I'm pretty excited about taking a hands-on approach to customer relations - monitoring and participating in conversations across the web as they happen (here's hopeful that they will!).
Hopefully more companies will begin to realize that playing the "king on top of the mountain" and not listening to the wants and needs of your subjects will do nothing but get you overthrown!
RT
www.anoweb.alturl.com
Comcast, for example, has one employee working fulltime to monitor Twitter posts and respond to complainers rapidly--smart!
If the social networking sites don't do this, too, they're inviting trouble, nasty comments and terrible publicity that can spin out of control.
For example, Joel Comm, a popular Internet marketer who has a huge following, sent an email to his list earlier this week complaining that Facebook removed his profile unfairly. He included a link to his blog post where he explained the whole ugly episode:
http://twitpwr.com/faceboot
I don't know how many people he has on his list, but I'm guessing it's well over 50,000. All it took was one email to alert his followers to the problem and present Facebook in a bad light, and with good reason.
Why isn't Facebook responding to these kinds of problems, the same way smart communicators are using Facebook to respond to their own followers and friends when something bad happens to them???
The same with Twitter. The site is so unstable that I read tweet after tweet from users who can't log onto the site for hours at a time, or error messages that keep popping up. I'd like to see more from Twitter about what it's doing to solve these problems.
You don't want any managers or leaders of a 'social' site.
It's just a bunch of people doing, saying, and deciding what THEY want to do.
That is the philosophy at canonizer.com.
Brent Allsop
URL: http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerI...
The thought of ignoring my community is an insane thought. Community managers are not just there to move posts and kill vulgar comments. Sure, if you are a SOCIAL community manager. If that's the type of community you run, then good on ya! It's not the type I run. We are not all in the same boat. There are ALL types of communities.
The thought of ignoring my community is an insane thought. Community managers are not just there to move posts and kill vulgar comments. Sure, if you are a SOCIAL community manager. If that's the type of community you run, then good on ya! It's not the type I run. We are not all in the same boat. There are ALL types of communities.
It takes a lot to admit a mistake. What I appreciate here--aside from admitting fault--is that the letter was signed by the CEO (an authority figure that people would listen, respect and look up to), and that the company was able to compromise between the desires of both the content owner and the public.