<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Huffington Post Profitable?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_5580/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:25:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Huffington Post Profitable?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/24/huffington-post-profitable/#comment-5998799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Julian is right. Some blog content makes no revenue from ads. I know this because I maintain a few different blogs in various niches and can tell you political and celebrity ads do not make as much as tech and money making/marketing ads do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's a hint. Most blog readers are bloggers so put up some blog marketing ads on your blog regardless of content and you will see it get clicked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sample ad would read: make six figures blogging!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">modemlooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:25:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huffington Post Profitable?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/24/huffington-post-profitable/#comment-5998798</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Julian is right. Some blog content makes no revenue from ads. I know this because I maintain a few different blogs in various niches and can tell you political and celebrity ads do not make as much as tech and money making/marketing ads do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's a hint. Most blog readers are bloggers so put up some blog marketing ads on you blog regardless of content and you will see it get clicked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sample ad would read: make six figures blogging!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">modemlooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:23:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huffington Post Profitable?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/24/huffington-post-profitable/#comment-5998797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They should be profitable with that amount of traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Altoft</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:48:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huffington Post Profitable?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/24/huffington-post-profitable/#comment-5998795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Being profitable in political commentary is rare. National Review never made a profit. It survived by donations from readers and William F. Buckley. The Nation, The New Republic, nor Reason make money. So I would be surprised if Huffington found some secret formula.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why don't political publications make money? Mainstream advertisers are wary of linking themselves too closely to political ideas. If Disney bought ads in National Review it could alienate Nation readers and vice versa. With tech weblogs there's not that ideological concern. Apple and Microsoft can advertise on competing weblogs or the same one without ticking off potential customers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seanhackbarth</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:58:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huffington Post Profitable?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/24/huffington-post-profitable/#comment-5998794</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@chrisbrogan that truly is a slice of irony.  I'm sure you could get a couple bucks if you throw some ads about here and there, Chris.  Just about everyone in the (social media) world knows who you are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:27:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huffington Post Profitable?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/24/huffington-post-profitable/#comment-5998793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ali I don't doubt your claim, as I've had a chance to talk briefly about this topic with Mary Katherine Ham before, and they seem like a solid group of capitalists with their heads screwed on right. On the other, I don't hear a lot of news regarding the company's financials, and I've looked around a bit for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:26:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huffington Post Profitable?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/24/huffington-post-profitable/#comment-5998792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny, because I bet MOST folks think Huffington and the like are more profitable, and all this social media blogging is the fad. Crap, I've gotta start getting ads or something so I can grow up to be like you guys. Truly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;: )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisbrogan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:41:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huffington Post Profitable?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/24/huffington-post-profitable/#comment-5998791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Townhall makes a lot of money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ali A. Akbar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:39:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>