<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_556066/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:27:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-10157663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a new one launched last week &lt;a href="http://www.tweetadder.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tweetadder.com"&gt;http://www.tweetadder.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:27:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-8283130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually had like extra 5-6 followers in a matter of minutes--all having TOTALLY THE SAME 1st update. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roanne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6649041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't people have anything better to do with their lives than live in these &lt;br&gt;Twitter/Facebook sites and exchange banal trivialities with each other?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:46:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know you have made it when there are people selling anti spam software just for your community.  It's awful on twitter because spamming abuses the core motive of twitter itself.  I've found a lot of good anti-spam information on this digital security &lt;a href="http://www.justaskgemalto.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.justaskgemalto.com/"&gt;site&lt;/a&gt; FYI.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">H.K.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're right, it's not like typical spam but it's still spam. &lt;br&gt;If it creates 50 accounts / day and all of them follow me I get 50 email messages and I click through 50 useless profiles. &lt;br&gt;How is that not spam? why do we not like spam?  &lt;br&gt;Because it's unsolicited distraction. And that's exactly what tweet tornado does. &lt;br&gt;Almost half of the "followers" I get are from such accounts or fake accounts that already got suspended.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You could just as well say that spam email is not spam unless I click the links and go buy something but that's not the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mihai Secasiu</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:43:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;TweetTornado only adds followers, People have to click on the page and choose to follow someone so there is no spam involved, only optin marketing. The only people who receive anything are the people who follow and give permission. Everyone needs to realize this is not like a typical spam tool. This is permission based optin marketing! And if twitter would quit shutting the accounts down for no good reason then the software wouldn't have to create unlimited accounts anymore. I don't see how this software is bad for twitter, anyone can do the same thing without software the difference is this software saves you alot of time following people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So to all you people who think I am wrong, ask yourself this question...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If a person must willingly choose to follow me and it is also their choice to click on my link to see whatever I am offering to "help" them, Then how could this be considered spam?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S. thanks to the blog owner for advertising my service, I'm getting lots of new customers now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tweet Tornado</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:31:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/suspended" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/suspended"&gt;http://twitter.com/suspended&lt;/a&gt;  came across this after reading your post this morning...it looks like one way twitter is fighting back.  i know i've noticed a large increase in "make money fast" followers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks for sharing the info - i think if the twitter community pushes back, we can keep unwated spammers out both with twitter features and from individual members not tolerating it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Helen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@mel no it's not like that, just a few days ago I received a message from a guy working with Adobe Air on Linux ( @smmehadi ) , he tried to help with an Air issue but I did not follow him and he didn't follow me but I was able to read his replies and he was able to see my replies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also reply all the time to people I follow but they don't follow me back and can see my message and even reply to it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only reason you're still not getting spam like this is because twitter is still very very very small compared to email.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mihai Secasiu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 07:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How is twitter opt in ? &lt;br&gt;Can't they just send you @replies to you without even following you ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes they can. True they have the api limit but even so once they reach the limit they can just jump to the next user/ip.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think spam @ twitter is still in it's beginning. Expect more once more people get in and see some of the big spamers use their bot nets for twitter instead of email.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mihai Secasiu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:40:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Nicole: In the end Twitter is a social networking site. That you have 5 accounts is your choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The main reason, as I see it, Twitter is a place to have fun and make friends. If people use it as a business thing, it is yet another fun service that is being polluted by people who want to make money on everything and take the fun out of everything.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And why do you need to outsource on Twitter? Seriously, are you for real?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find it sad that you support a tool like this. I'm extremely annoyed by all the spam on Twitter at the moment. I know users who go from public to private to avoid spam.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They have a API. If you can't be bothered using it, don't complain. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:59:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw these guys last week. I'm not worried about it as twitter should be tackling this fairly quickly. This just confirms twitter is now in fact main-steam.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone actually read the Twitter TOS?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's nothing in the TOS that disallows using scripts, third party tools, multiple accounts, or any of the uses of this software. The most the TOS says is "You must not create or submit unwanted email to any Twitter members ("Spam").", which would be a neat trick since you don't get access to other twitter user's email.  Perhaps Twitter would have a better chance at fighting spam if they'd define what is and isn't allowed.  Frankly, they've been banning accounts that have done nothing wrong according to their TOS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the long run, the marketplace of Twitter will do the best job of fighting spam.  Just don't follow the spammers and don't click their links.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Draper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:27:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love how it says ZDNet discovered this software.  I saw this at least a week or more ago.  Same old people taking credit for all the news on the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think a lot of us "small people" would be very impressed if you guys gave us a plug now and then.  If you only listen to the "a-listers" of the web you're gonna stagnate just like the old media dinosaurs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:25:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The same story we've seen countless times with other social sites. But Twitter has no revenue, so they really need to watch themselves.  Spam can make or break sites before they have a chance to "enter the mainstream."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:14:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297169</link><description></description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:32:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297167</link><description></description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:51:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;point taken!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diana</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:49:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure how much good it does to even publish this story to be honest. Just giving these guys more attention is probably having them jump with joy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And let's face it, tons of spamming marketers read the stuff here, and they are probably off buying the crap right now because of this and other stories condemning the software.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agreed, the software is another pollutant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Telling people about it probably ain't the wisest move if you ask me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Moffatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:37:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;well spam is counterproductive! what is spam, unwanted advertsing. i get it on my comments to be approved page all the time. 90% of it is pointless, build relationships in business first. As for the software granted I have not  looked at it, but in this day and age we rely a lot on the recommendations of those people who use the technology the most and make it a point to look into it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now what do most people call spam and is the software able to be uzed in more productive ways, more than likely.&lt;br&gt;it is important to dialogue about these issues to come to a balanced view.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, i am glad that people look out for the less savvy users! With increased popularity of programs like twitter the likelihood of exploitation is much higher.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diana</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:30:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297162</link><description></description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:24:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Until Twitter get's a business model they are going to be plagued by spam and the reason is spammers have a business model. The problem of course is this is not a technology problem it is a people problem, as long as spam has a conversion rate and near zero variable costs for distribution they will keep investing in new ways to spam twitter. I wrote a while ago that I thought spam and MLM are a huge risk to twitters business because if twitter has to keep investing enormous resources in combating well funded and motivated spammers they will not evolve their business. Here's the article: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://experiencecurve.com/archives/why-mlm-will-kill-twitter-hint-because-they-have-a-business-model" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://experiencecurve.com/archives/why-mlm-will-kill-twitter-hint-because-they-have-a-business-model"&gt;http://experiencecurve.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karl Long</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:16:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Name of the game I guess. Always works itself out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pnw fitness</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:10:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thankyou for bringing us such up-to-date info that is helpful, in not only alerting us to new threats, but educates us about using the internet in an ethical way for business and socialisation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was almost drawn in by a new company last night but a fellow twitterer send a warning about the spam potential of the program so i pulled out, until I have more information on them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;well done!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Diana&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diana</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:04:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweettornado: Twitter Spamming Software We Won&amp;#8217;t Tolerate</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/04/tweettornado/#comment-6297156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Think of this in a good way. Spammers create jobs. Without them there would be no anti-spam software and the jobs created to make that software... or those delicious gmail recipes so i say I salute you spammers *bunchofnonsequitors* i salute you&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">isharted</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>