<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Confirmed: Google Takes on PowerPoint</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_5478/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:59:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Google Takes on PowerPoint</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/04/17/google-powerpoint/#comment-5927668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Master William", do you really, even in your dreams, belive that a language can make your application look bad?? There are a lot of bad looking applications out there, some are witten in Java , some are not. There are also a lot of nice looking applications and you know what, some of them are written in Java to... If the application looks bad then the developer/designer is responsible, not his programming language. &lt;br&gt;Further more, if the application are located on  a server then your browser are more likely to be at fault than the serverside application&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tired of the clichÃ©</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:59:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Google Takes on PowerPoint</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/04/17/google-powerpoint/#comment-5927667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Master William: It looked to me like it might be a primarily backend system, so it's possible that the reference to Java is not about the UI being a Java applet but that the whole programme is written in the Java programming language. That would make sense, because many of the Goog's products are written in Java.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Huw Leslie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:30:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Google Takes on PowerPoint</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/04/17/google-powerpoint/#comment-5927666</link><description>&lt;p&gt;waste of focus for google. desktop apps have a place, and MS has cemented that position for the foreseeable future. until then, google should continue it's disruptive ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremy daw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:28:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Google Takes on PowerPoint</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/04/17/google-powerpoint/#comment-5927665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks like garbage, as is usual for a Java based app&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Master William</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:49:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>