-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2006/02/23/googles-new-strategy-spray-and-pray/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
4 hours ago · 89 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
3 hours ago · 16 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
4 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
5 hours ago · 27 comments
-
BREAKING: Google Launches Real-Time Search Results
1 day ago · 96 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
How could you use something like that?
Next question? :)
a "pagetype" (galleries, blog, links, about, contact, media libraries, etc.) approach. Being a web developer, I don't want to have to spend time developing my site, I just want it done. And I really don't want to have to maintain multiple pieces of software.
"If you throw enough sh!t out there some of has got to stick!"
I like Google. The company has done some great things. However, it is obvious Google wants to take over as much as it possibly can till Rome falls. A good motto may be - the World or bust! I think if these types of aggressive moves continue you will begin to see more and more "Google is evil" campaigning similar to how people campaigned against Microsoft only five short years ago. People like the underdog and are anti-establishment so hopefully Google can continue to put out solid products and emphasize communicating its ultimate intentions to fend off any distrust.
But even so, I'm wondering what the point is... I was so disappointed with Google Base. I expected so much more after becoming enamored with Gmail. And Google Base had the potential to be something truly disruptive (imagine being able to store all your data (files, emails, notes, graphics, music, movies, etc), for free, in one place with an awesome ability to search and have it accessible wherever you are?? That's the grail!. But that's not what GBase turned out to be. Instead it left me unimpressed and wondering what the point was supposed to be...
I have a feeling my reaction to Google Pages will be the same... Or maybe it'll be like my recent experience with Squidoo... at first it was "Oh, cool, look what you can do with this" and then, after I set it all up, it was "now what??". No interaction with users through feedback or comments, no way to monitor traffic... basically a one-way dead end for information. So 1990's.
How can Google Pages compete with a free Blogger account? Why is there a need for something TO compete with that and why would Google launch something to compete with it's own offerings? Surely there has to be a niche that I'm overlooking...
Content drives ads, free hosting captures content, makes sense to me.
Why Google are doing that way? Why PageCreator is not integrated with Blogger. Why Blogger isn't integrated with Orkut. I'm trying to figure out!
It seens that there is a lack of communications between Google teams.
Google is pursuing the entire advertising market and a lot of that comes from local small businesses who have yet to get a web presence and probably just want/need a single page.
I'm with Lindsay on all this. The stuff is coming out so fast anymore I feel like I'm drowning in a Web 2.0 (meme)pool. Kudos to Mashable for at least tracking this stuff. Even so...
Larry Page in Time magazine interview, February 20, 2006, in response to a question: “Is there a grand strategy for Google?â€
I've said this before, but it seems that this famous and much mooted 20% thing (which is blessed as originating from Sergei) will take Google down if they don't get a handle on it.
They're employing a lot of smart people, and one of the things that gets these people in the door is the 20% rule. So these people get a nice job and the ability to do their startup on the company dollar.
So thousands of people are spinning things off in company time, it's official Google policy, it's invented by god, so it has to work.
So Google has to take some of these projects and release them.
But as they are all invented by teams of engineers, there's no business planning or sanity checking.
Now I would guess that the people who make the decisions as to what goes 'live' are upper level managers. These will be people with some idea about the bigger Google picture. They won't want to release any of the wilder ideas that are no doubt brewing within the Googleplex. So they are picking things that they recognise. And what can be more recognisable than a web based web site creator? (I think that was first built on about day seven of the internet).
There's some serious management attention needed at Google - they are riding on their cash cow. Sooner or later the markets are going to ask some very difficult questions.
Could someone list a couple o URLs, perhaps...