<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in ShopWiki Launches Video Reviews</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_4842/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:30:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ShopWiki Launches Video Reviews</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-launches-video-reviews/#comment-5896519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heyyy like wat up, HEYYYYY!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cutie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:30:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShopWiki Launches Video Reviews</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-launches-video-reviews/#comment-5896518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doooy Doy I'm so stipid Im so stpid Doy hi does this sell dontats doy&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hottie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:28:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShopWiki Launches Video Reviews</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-launches-video-reviews/#comment-5896516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i love stardoll because it is fun&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stephen wallace</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 17:08:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShopWiki Launches Video Reviews</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-launches-video-reviews/#comment-5896515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sup&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">destiny</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:07:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShopWiki Launches Video Reviews</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-launches-video-reviews/#comment-5896514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sup&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">destiny</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:07:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShopWiki Launches Video Reviews</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-launches-video-reviews/#comment-5896513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Affiliate coding is completely achievable. All they have to do is convert those links that do have affiliate programs into tracked links.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since almost half the products on the ShowWiki site appear to have an Amazon link - just adding an affiliate code to those links could produce a considerable revenue steam.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After all, Epinions turns product reviews into affiliate dollars and seems to be doing quite well. A similar comparison can be made with ShopWiki and sites like &lt;a href="http://Shopper.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Shopper.com"&gt;Shopper.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://Shopzilla.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Shopzilla.com"&gt;Shopzilla.com&lt;/a&gt; (neither is user-generated, though both are doing quite well with affiliate revenue earnings).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Bijon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:31:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShopWiki Launches Video Reviews</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-launches-video-reviews/#comment-5896512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pete - I dont think they are injecting affiliate codes into product links because they no feasible way of doing so. You see there are 2 basic models: the affiliate model and the spider the web for data model. These guys have selected the latter and are spidering 1000's of e-commerce sites, grabbing images, descriptions and ratings (which in of itself seems to be perplexing as to why this is permitted legally).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The affiliate option, which they have not chosen, does not require any web crawing because affiliate programs always provide all the above content without needing any fancy web crawling technology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given this, I dont see how they could possibly employ both models.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adrian Soltan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:34:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>