<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_4835/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:03:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Old fashioned maybe but still fun to see some of these videos again or the watch the ones that I missed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My favorites: &lt;br&gt;Sports - 5'9 Best Dunker in the world &lt;br&gt;Music - Chocolate Rain &lt;br&gt;Comedy - Mario - Game Over &lt;br&gt;Creative - Human Tetris&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ExpiredPineapples</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:03:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;YouTube Robot enables you to download videos from YouTube and automatically convert them to be viewed on your Video iPod, Zune, PSP or other portable ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can download YouTube Robot from following link&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtuberobot.com/download/utuberobot.exe" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtuberobot.com/download/utuberobot.exe"&gt;http://www.youtuberobot.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtuberobot.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtuberobot.com/"&gt;http://www.youtuberobot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vicky</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:12:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's interesting if the winner getting some prize for their hard work to create a great videos.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">utube.com videos</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:12:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hi&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nelly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No.  YouTube needs to prove that there are legitimate noninfringing uses for the technology - they're highlighting the fact that copyrighted content is not the mainstay of youtube, as viacom claims.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 07:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pete,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So you're saying that because YouTube made up their own awards, allowing their users to vote on prescribed nominee's... this will be of value in court regarding using material however they want, without paying a royalty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I fail to follow your logic. Why is an awards ceremony generated by YouTube an indication that using copyrighted material is for the common good, or... something.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:09:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I prefer the theory that they're using the awards as part of their defense against the Viacom lawsuit: proof that the user-generated content is important and that YouTube has "good uses" as well as copyright-infringing ones.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:40:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The "awards" are a complete load. The nominee's are pre-designed by the "brains" at Youtube to fit their meddling/marketing schemes for it's "celebrities."&lt;br&gt;It's hard to tell why YouTube even involves itself in that stupidity. Probably people there looking to justify their salaries.&lt;br&gt;It's a shame. YouTube was worth something when they were satisfied simply with providing content, and letting the users do what they wanted without their YouTube's now endless meddling for no good reason.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Appscout and PCMag made their picks right here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.appscout.com/2007/03/the_best_youtube_video_awards_nominees.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.appscout.com/2007/03/the_best_youtube_video_awards_nominees.php"&gt;http://www.appscout.com/200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dedownman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:31:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This idea was stolen from youtube user mattpyrch.If you go to his channel on youtube (mattpyrch) and find his video on the youtube awards, its dated aug 2006. also go to &lt;a href="http://www.freewebs.com/youtubevideoawards" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.freewebs.com/youtubevideoawards"&gt;www.freewebs.com/youtubevid...&lt;/a&gt; and notice the time line....SHAME ON YOUTUBE!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924701</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think just because it's YouTube and they have such a large user-base, the awards will do well regardless of the fact that it is a little old-fashioned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ashley Wagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:08:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with the commenter who noted the 1.0-ness of awards shows. Podcasters went through this (heck, the whole top-10 idea is so silly comparing things that have nothing to do with each other) so it was inevitable to happen to video.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now if we could get the communities to stop thinking their own selves are the end-all, be-all of the definition of the word, whatever the word may be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Rice</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924697</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With the "internet chess", years ago, some Masters went to chess on the web, as anonymous to compete.. Will be the same situation with "famous" realisators who will compete as anonymous ?? That is ONE question ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pierre</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:27:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You pay your 2006 taxes in April 2007...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DK</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:22:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Video Awards</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/18/youtube-video-awards/#comment-5924695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. There already is an online-video awards show. It's called Vloggies. &lt;a href="http://www.vloggiesshow.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.vloggiesshow.com/"&gt;http://www.vloggiesshow.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The videos on the vlog there are quite interesting (Rocketboom, Ask a Ninja, and others are interviewed there):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://vloggies.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://vloggies.wordpress.com/"&gt;http://vloggies.wordpress.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 01:42:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>