<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Google Video Indexing Metacafe&amp;#8230;In a Google Branded Player?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_425/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:44:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Video Indexing Metacafe&amp;#8230;In a Google Branded Player?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/google-video-metacafe/#comment-5946469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I dont think that Google has done this without the permission of metacafe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Metacafe recently &lt;a href="http://www.webtvwire.com/metacafe-to-launch-static-video-ads-similar-to-youtube-with-adaptv/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.webtvwire.com/metacafe-to-launch-static-video-ads-similar-to-youtube-with-adaptv/"&gt;launched&lt;/a&gt; in-video static ads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I'm a bit confused how these ads would then fit within the Google player, or if Google would use the same ad system that youtube is using for metacafe videos and split revenues with Metacafe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;MetaCafe gets more video views from the google search = more ad revenue&lt;br&gt;Google gets more videos in its index which it can earn money directly from video ads = more ad revenue&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just a thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris TV</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:44:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Video Indexing Metacafe&amp;#8230;In a Google Branded Player?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/google-video-metacafe/#comment-5946467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In this case, the video "preview" is the entire video.. I just love the fact that this example is "stolen" from Viacom anyway...it just does not stop..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Revilo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:32:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Video Indexing Metacafe&amp;#8230;In a Google Branded Player?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/google-video-metacafe/#comment-5946466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't understand how they can download the metacafe video and then put the video in their own player as if it came from google video. The likelyhood of someone clicking the video to go to metacafe will be  very small. Also all of metacafe's video player controls are now missing/replaced with google's video player controls. Seems like this behavior by google will put them as the recipient of a lawsuit by metacafe. Seems like an open and shut case in metacafe's favor if google keeps this up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ty Graham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:22:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Video Indexing Metacafe&amp;#8230;In a Google Branded Player?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/google-video-metacafe/#comment-5946465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...unless Google wants to include a button on the search results that allows the viewer to donate some of Google's money to the site serving the content.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deralaand</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:48:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Video Indexing Metacafe&amp;#8230;In a Google Branded Player?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/google-video-metacafe/#comment-5946464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Video sites like Metacafe and Revver and others will start serving trailers that will get indexed. This will be the only way to get people back to their sites. They have to go if they want to whole video.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deralaand</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Video Indexing Metacafe&amp;#8230;In a Google Branded Player?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/google-video-metacafe/#comment-5946463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh.  Good point.  The videos are going to come from the major players, so I expect they'll block everything marked 13+.  But, this is another example of cumulative advantage: if they're selective about which video sharing sites get video previews (the popular ones), then the others may have trouble growing to that scale.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 07:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Video Indexing Metacafe&amp;#8230;In a Google Branded Player?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/google-video-metacafe/#comment-5946462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if this will just stop people going further into video content sites like metacafe, I mean not many people would even visit video websites then anymore. They would just stay on Google and keep searching away while watching videos on search result pages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder if they will be doing the same for those "other" video sites too. Imagine a wrong kind of video showing up for a search result....to a teacher.....in a classroom!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ali</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 07:24:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>