Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in ReputationDefender – Nuke Those Naked Pics and Blog Rants

Re: ReputationDefender – Nuke Those Naked Pics and Blog Rants

johnathanvrozos — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:09:31 -0000

Johnathan Vrozos Jv says They seem to still be around.

Re: ReputationDefender – Nuke Those Naked Pics and Blog Rants

Jon Smith — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:50:50 -0000

ReputationDefender just spams the Internet with client info. You give them your resume, ReputationDefender translates it into a paragraph or two and then posts it all over at LinkedIn and ClaimID and such. Not a scam, but a somewhat shady operation. Anyone with a free afternoon could do the work themselves and save paying ReputationDefender anything.

ReputationDefender's sales guy, Brent Franson, is a self-professed search marketing guru, but if this is the best he can come up with he is grossly overcompensated. Everyone on the Management page for ReputationDefender has little to no experience in the SEO/SERM world before they started this outfit. Dead by summer, I guarantee.

Re: ReputationDefender – Nuke Those Naked Pics and Blog Rants

ambien — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:57:38 -0000

Due to issues with my insurance I recently have had to switch from Ambien CR to regular Ambien. Although the medication is very helpful to me in falling asleep I have found that I wake up throughout the night (1-3 times). A problem that I did not experience when taking the Ambien CR. Nonetheless, Ambien has significantly helped me cope with my insomnia.

Re: ReputationDefender – Nuke Those Naked Pics and Blog Rants

DavidEzra — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:59:40 -0000

It seems that the "successfulness" of ReputationDefender will hinge on one key characteristic of human nature - are the majority of individuals (1) proactive or (2) reactive?

In short, a subscription model of revenues is only as solid as an individual's willingness to be "Proactive" in protecting thier reputation.

Unfortunately, its my assumption that the majority of individuals are "Reactive" (especially outside the realm of "tech-geekdom.") In other words, they will only want this service at the time of applying for a job, or more likely, after they have been rejected due to compromising material found on the internet. (In essence, it seems that ReputationDefender would find more success with a business / revenue model that caters to the "Reactive" nature of an individual.)

(Also, great idea about "plagiarized content.")

Re: ReputationDefender – Nuke Those Naked Pics and Blog Rants

Christopher Sisk — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:58:07 -0000

I agree... credit card forms and "verisign" logos are a cue to close that tab.

Re: ReputationDefender – Nuke Those Naked Pics and Blog Rants

Jimmy — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:17:06 -0000

Luckily for me, jimmythomas.com is a personal trainer and a model.

He also lives in Tampa, where I spent 20 years growing up... lol

Re: ReputationDefender – Nuke Those Naked Pics and Blog Rants

Julien — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:47:01 -0000

ReputationDefender, les gros bras du web

Comment contrÃ´ler votre image sur la toile, sans recourir Ã un flog :)

Re: ReputationDefender – Nuke Those Naked Pics and Blog Rants

Peter — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:43:32 -0000

like the graphics.

heard about startup Attributor for doing the content-sniffing stuff. don't really know anything about them, other than the company's name makes sense.

http://www.attributor.com/