-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2008/04/07/web-20-stagnation/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
4 hours ago · 92 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
3 hours ago · 16 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
4 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
6 hours ago · 28 comments
-
BREAKING: Google Launches Real-Time Search Results
1 day ago · 96 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
I think what is exciting about the facebook chat development is that it takes the socilization on a major soical network from past tense ( inbox, feeds, wall posts etc ) to a realtime interaction level.
Dean
YouCams.com
I'm a huge fan of IRC. I got my start in basic scripting in IRC communities, started using Linux thanks to what I learned in IRC, and so forth. IRC is second nature to me when it comes to the web.
I think the issue is mostly that interacting with IRC has never grown up. Registration and daily use requires obscure syntax that the every-day chatter just isn't going to want to learn.
It may be superior technology, and it'll continue to thrive as a means of support for communities I imagine. But you're right. IRC (and basic web forums) WERE the social web before the social web. And now you've gone and made me feel all nostalgic for the early days of IM.
People are using their personal names as monikers, putting up photos of themselves, etc. The reason Facebook chat is good is simply because it's personally relevant. That's it's leg-up on all the others.
You've got a name, and you know that person. That person will not be switching names to confuse the hell out of you. I'm sure you're all familiar with this:
"
SocerGRUL910: Hi!
You: Uh. Hi? Do I know you?
SocerGRUL910: It's me! Your Girlfriend this is my new nick.
You: Oh.. ok, let me add you to the list of your other names. "
Now it's just a first and last name, and a picture. You have to admit - THAT is an improvement.
The reason why Facebook IM is powerful/interesting is not that it gives you a new way to do IM. It's that now you don't need to maintain a separate list of your "buddies" in AIM, your buddy list is the same list you are already maintaining in Facebook.
I can see where you're coming from, however,
Yeah... But...
What's different from the other Chat Apps already running on Facebook?
I work for a couple of startups (spend my time on a couple of clients' development needs), and while I also get carried away by the "let's take this in a different angle" race from one project to another -- I've come to realize that a lot of it is just riffing on past glories.
And, in Net terms, I'm an old man -- having come to web dev in '94 and kept up with things from there... It sure is amazing how things have changed. Almost as amazing as how much they've remained the same.
I also know that the WyldRyde chat server also provides a decent flash client for their servers that I've used before...
Anyway, the point is, if you look for it, you can have your web chat 2.0 cake and eat it with your old trusty IRC fork if you look hard enough.
I think I'll go and start work on it straight away!!
If creating a new application like this was revolutionary then it would be worth millions and everyone would want to copy it, exactly what your talking about.
I hate to tell you, but less than 1% of what's out there is truly original and this applies to any industry or any medium. Problem is now that you have taken the red pill it will start to bother you a whole lot more in everything that you look at. :)
What a nice community it were then . . .
The web has become a haven for wankers, wowsers, wimblets and wussoids -- just like the real world.