<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Adobe Gets the Press But Does Search No Favors</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_4032/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:55:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Adobe Gets the Press But Does Search No Favors</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/01/adobe-search/#comment-6009428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i'm just a person.  Your search engine does me no favors&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Schuler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:55:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adobe Gets the Press But Does Search No Favors</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/01/adobe-search/#comment-6009427</link><description>&lt;p&gt;pingback from &lt;a href="http://bits.samiq.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bits.samiq.net"&gt;bits.samiq.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SEO for RIA: the status a few days later :&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[And making echo of Steven Hodson from Mashable!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Search is not - or should not be - about the companies. It should be about all the companies being able to provide the best results they can to anyone who wants to use any search engine they choose]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://bits.samiq.net/2008/07/seo-for-ria-status-few-days-later.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bits.samiq.net/2008/07/seo-for-ria-status-few-days-later.html"&gt;http://bits.samiq.net/2008/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Samiq</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:45:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adobe Gets the Press But Does Search No Favors</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/01/adobe-search/#comment-6009426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I personally am hoping that this announcement means they'll Adobe et all will address all the said issues, e.g: so you click search result for a flash file and it opens up that web-page with the exact place in the timeline of the flash file that the searched for text appears.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would assume that exactly what they are working on is to finally address that issue. Would you guys disagree?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James&lt;br&gt;from&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://FaceySpacey.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="FaceySpacey.com"&gt;FaceySpacey.com&lt;/a&gt; - "The Startup Incubator"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Facey Spacey Technologies</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adobe Gets the Press But Does Search No Favors</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/01/adobe-search/#comment-6009425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To really add to Andy comment, this is not a major event, a major event would have been to admit that Flash/Flex designer developers need to change their ways to develop Search engine friendly sites and to provide tools for them to do so. Until Adobe and Google agree a method of headings and other ranking factors their is no way Google can truly rank a flash file. That is of course if they can get beyond the fact a flash file is an object who's basis is time based while pages and websites in general are flat and interlinked these are two very separate objects matching them is not going to be easy!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Nash</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:18:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adobe Gets the Press But Does Search No Favors</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/01/adobe-search/#comment-6009424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://scobleizer.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="scobleizer.com"&gt;scobleizer.com&lt;/a&gt; is thinking the same...&lt;br&gt;Google and Adobe just want to fight Silverlight&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://scobleizer.com/2008/07/01/adobe-flash-gets-a-break-in-war-against-silverlight/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://scobleizer.com/2008/07/01/adobe-flash-gets-a-break-in-war-against-silverlight/"&gt;http://scobleizer.com/2008/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Egbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:36:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adobe Gets the Press But Does Search No Favors</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/01/adobe-search/#comment-6009422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I`m concerned about the consequences as well...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Depending on how they implement the search feature, it could add a new dimension to search engine spam. Imagin how many words you could include within a flash document without screwing up your layout.... scary&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Egbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adobe Gets the Press But Does Search No Favors</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/01/adobe-search/#comment-6009421</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Steven,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They must be planning on releasing an API to the public eventually. Otherwise, I don't think MS would turn the offer down, thinking it a good decision to help Silverlight beat Flash. They know if Google supports searching flash, whether they support it or not won't make a difference at all. I think Adobe and co just want to kill MS and an potential of a silverlight threat--that's all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The real question, as you say pretty much, is of course when do the little guys get access to the flash search APIs???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(note: I don't think it's wrong at all--it's common business tactics. The point is Adobe wants Google and Yahoo to expend significant resources in time, money etc to make this happen. So, it's not some big evil business tactic that is just "plain wrong" as you say. It's also a way to incentive making a useful technology widespread. A lot of people want to make claims about large companies doing all sorts of "evil" things, when in reality, the very nature of business is what propells the proper execution of things as well as innovation like this. So why should the little guy's get access to it, when Google will sooner allow us to search flash files by the incentive provided by Adobe??? It makes perfect sense to me, and I'm sure part of the plan is to open it up to smaller companies ine 6 months or a year, after which Google probably paved the way for everyone else!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James&lt;br&gt;from&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://FaceySpacey.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="FaceySpacey.com"&gt;FaceySpacey.com&lt;/a&gt; - "The Startup Incubator"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Facey Spacey Technologies</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:09:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>