<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Survey Finds Few Web Video Viewers Wish To Build Bridge To TV</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_37156/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:49:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Survey Finds Few Web Video Viewers Wish To Build Bridge To TV</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/21/web-video-tv/#comment-5998515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with the first commenter. Watching TV is a very different experience to online video. You don't want interactivity when you're watching 'TV', the complete failure of interactive TV projects in the past demonstrates this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes we want to be the passenger, not the driver. TV is a way to relax, no need to think, just let it wash over you. Change the camera angle? NO THANKS! That's what technical director's are paid to do, and they do a great job.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mouse in hand is totally different - you're driving, you're in control, you want interactivity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 2 minute clips experience will not make the transition to TV, channel-centric services like &lt;a href="http://WorldTV.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WorldTV.com"&gt;WorldTV.com&lt;/a&gt; and Joost can.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alx Klive</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:49:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Survey Finds Few Web Video Viewers Wish To Build Bridge To TV</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/21/web-video-tv/#comment-5998514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the future!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BidMogul.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:26:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Survey Finds Few Web Video Viewers Wish To Build Bridge To TV</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/21/web-video-tv/#comment-5998513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't imagine buying a TV without the specific intention of hooking my computer to it so I can keep watching streaming or downloaded video. If there was a way to get everything I want to watch online, I would never turn to DVD. As it is, I have stopped turning to TV altogether. You can get Rock of Love on iTunes, after all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leona</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:06:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Survey Finds Few Web Video Viewers Wish To Build Bridge To TV</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/03/21/web-video-tv/#comment-5998512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IPTV is the future. The only problem is that no one seems to realize that people enjoy PASSIVE entertainment just as much as they enjoy ACTIVE entertainment, if not more. If Apple or anyone else were to build a service that offers an elegant combination of the two (if they wanted to talk to me, hell, I'd give them an idea or two) then they'd have the deal sealed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No one wants to have to choose what they watch all the time, and everyone wants to have the opportunity to do so when they desire. That's just what it comes down to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BrianMojo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:05:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>