<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in New York Times Launches TimesPeople Social Networking Site</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_3665/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:16:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New York Times Launches TimesPeople Social Networking Site</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/22/timespeople/#comment-8565709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi to all.........&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sameer_bhardwaj</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:16:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New York Times Launches TimesPeople Social Networking Site</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/22/timespeople/#comment-6020191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"if you love the NYTimes then you should enjoy TimesPeople."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've been a NYT reader for most of the last 35 years so I guess that makes me "loyal," though I have no emotional attachment and certainly don't "love" it.    But it's the premier U.S. newspaper and a site I look at half a dozen times a day and spend 15-30 minutes daily in.  So they've got my eyeballs for their ads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I want social networking, I'll use a dedicated social networking site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I go the &lt;a href="http://nytimes.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="nytimes.com"&gt;nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt; for news, period.  Nothing else.  I understand why they want to try and leverage the brand into other stuff, but I wish it didn't get in the way.  For example on the TMobile G1, the TimesPeople bar is almost impossible to get rid of, and it takes up 10% of the tiny screen and moves around jerkily, obscuring the screen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Colin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:51:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New York Times Launches TimesPeople Social Networking Site</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/22/timespeople/#comment-6020190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Naturally some people will be concerned about security and privacy matters regarding their activities on the NYTimes website."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;True - but its worth clarifying the point that TimesPeople is opt-in. You have to take active measures to be able to perform recommendations and other actions. Even then, only what you choose to send is collected - there is no 'monitoring'. In addition, you can always delete individual activities from your feed or disable Sharing entirely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:31:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New York Times Launches TimesPeople Social Networking Site</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/22/timespeople/#comment-6020189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How they say :&lt;br&gt;TimesPeople is a new way to discover what other readers find interesting on our site â€” and to make recommendations of your own.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So we should beleive them?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">www.artikel32.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New York Times Launches TimesPeople Social Networking Site</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/22/timespeople/#comment-6020188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good suggestion on a social network for a group of newspapers, could make better sense here. After all, I would not say that NYTimes overloads us with the number of articles that we could really need a recommendation engine. What's more, it could be better off as an application for Facebook or LinkedIn (better yet) instead of making us build yet another network of friends.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>