@Malcolm, AFAIK Chrome on windows was built using WinHTTP and a Windows-only sandboxing framework, so no, they didn't write it cross-platform out of the box. Explains the delays.
Kemeny_x
· 9 months ago
cant wait!!!!
Pictures
· 9 months ago
Clean and simple is always good. Perhaps the design could be a little bit more "Mac"?
Screen Sleuth
· 9 months ago
I found Chrome a little "too" simple for me. It is clean, though. It needs fleshing out a bit to really be my main browser (The Windows version).
Mac version: If clicking doesn't even work, it isn't anywhere near complete.
What screenshot? :) the image in the post is like a mockup.
TwisterMc
· 9 months ago
It's a start, but like the source post points out, it's not designed and it's no where close to being complete.
Edgar Rodriguez
· 9 months ago
Google Chrome, can't wait.
MircOSX
· 9 months ago
I agree with Sleuth, Chrome is too simple for me, let's see if Mac version is better; anyway I don't understand why everything comes out from Google HAVE TO be good... I use firefox and I won't switch to chrome, maybe use it as secondary browser... Chrome is a light and neat browser but it's just the first attempt, people at Google are so good that I know they will improve it soon.
All Comments
fleshing out a bit to really be my main browser (The Windows version).
Mac version: If clicking doesn't even work, it isn't anywhere near complete.
http://osx.iusethis.com/screenshot/osx/stainles...
is better; anyway I don't understand why everything comes out from Google
HAVE TO be good... I use firefox and I won't switch to chrome, maybe use
it as secondary browser...
Chrome is a light and neat browser but it's just the first attempt, people at
Google are so good that I know they will improve it soon.