<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in NYTimes, Now Also in News Aggregator Flavor</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_352750/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:19:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NYTimes, Now Also in News Aggregator Flavor</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/04/nytimes-news-aggregator/#comment-6030367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hotels</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:19:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NYTimes, Now Also in News Aggregator Flavor</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/04/nytimes-news-aggregator/#comment-6030365</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks terrible. They should include the links in the articles, but not the front page. They have it backwards!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hashim Warren</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:07:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NYTimes, Now Also in News Aggregator Flavor</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/04/nytimes-news-aggregator/#comment-6030364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very cool. About time traditional media embraced a more social approach. I still remember the time not too long ago when I did some freelance writing for Brandweek and they wouldn't even let me use hotlinks to relevant content in my articles...which were about social media. Imagine the irony.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CNN has actually been doing a similar thing for a while now, pulling relevant content from the blogosphere below articles -- even more social than the NYT approach, which seems to mostly pull from other big traditional news publishers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, let's see something like Zoetrope (&lt;a href="http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2008/12/03/geek-wednesdays-the-ephemeral-web/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2008/12/03/geek-wednesdays-the-ephemeral-web/)"&gt;http://www.brainpickings.or...&lt;/a&gt; getting integrated with something like the NYT. Talk about upping the ball game.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maria</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:32:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NYTimes, Now Also in News Aggregator Flavor</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/04/nytimes-news-aggregator/#comment-6030362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BBC's been doing this for a couple of years of course, following the Hutton inquiry that said they needed to be open.  &amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7764381.stm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7764381.stm"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:34:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>