<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in First There Came the Twitties, Now Here Come the Tweeples</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_34608/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:29:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: First There Came the Twitties, Now Here Come the Tweeples</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/28/tweeples/#comment-6020998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sarah sent me the format this morning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"PRsarahevans morning! here is format: @nameofperson, #category; @nameofperson, #category"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Too confusing especially with category names like: #TWEEPLES TO WATCH (up and coming) and #TECHNOLOGY/ WEB 2.0&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Voting would have to look something like:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@stevegarfield, #TWEEPLES TO WATCH (up and coming); @stevegarfield, #TECHNOLOGY/ WEB 2.0&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Way too confusing with too many # , and ;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suggested suspending the voting and redoing the voting page so all people need to do is enter twitter usernames under multiple categories.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Garfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:29:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First There Came the Twitties, Now Here Come the Tweeples</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/28/tweeples/#comment-6020997</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why don't these people get real and realise that this sort of stupidity alienates so many people&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:59:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First There Came the Twitties, Now Here Come the Tweeples</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/28/tweeples/#comment-6020996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;eh? Tweeple? Twitter people? Twitties?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;im gonna try &lt;a href="http://tweepletwak.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tweepletwak.com"&gt;tweepletwak.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;geez.. what a name...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rama</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First There Came the Twitties, Now Here Come the Tweeples</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/28/tweeples/#comment-6020994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The name or the statement? The name is silly. But so is Twitter. And "tweet." I mean, what the heck is "Tweeple?" The Internet's feverish branding race has ruined great terminology. It's just sort of accepted. Unfortunately, I think a good portion of the non-techie world looks at this stuff and thinks we're insane.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Glazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:10:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First There Came the Twitties, Now Here Come the Tweeples</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/09/28/tweeples/#comment-6020992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really confused what its all about:( hehe&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:59:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>