<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in The Final Chapter: Yahoo Now Wants to Be Acquired by Microsoft</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_33503/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:10:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Final Chapter: Yahoo Now Wants to Be Acquired by Microsoft</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/06/yahoo-microsoft-buy-acquisition/#comment-6025651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The reason why Microsoft wants to buy yahoo is to Force it's Silverlight product on the user base. It's obvious. I'm sure they have other uses for the yahoo platform, but I'm telling you this is the ultimate goal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;a year or so ago, Myspace forced all users to upgrade to flash 9.0 in order to get in to the site. It was a very effect move and this is what Microsoft wants to do with "silverlight"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mossill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:10:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Final Chapter: Yahoo Now Wants to Be Acquired by Microsoft</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/06/yahoo-microsoft-buy-acquisition/#comment-6025648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google is evil&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marguerite Jasmin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:57:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Final Chapter: Yahoo Now Wants to Be Acquired by Microsoft</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/06/yahoo-microsoft-buy-acquisition/#comment-6025647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amazing! Just a while ago they were in the arms of Google...and now after being dumped by them they want to go to Microsoft... Boy yahoo sounds like a big time Hooker!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Saad Kamal</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:46:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Final Chapter: Yahoo Now Wants to Be Acquired by Microsoft</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/06/yahoo-microsoft-buy-acquisition/#comment-6025646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right, they wanted to sell at a price that Microsoft wasn't willing to chomp at. When Microsoft saw the Yahoo stock fall (It's now about $14.50), the asking price was just too high. My question now is, where's the requisite "flip-flop" allusion to today's news? Even though it's quite a bit more complicated than that :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Glazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Final Chapter: Yahoo Now Wants to Be Acquired by Microsoft</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/06/yahoo-microsoft-buy-acquisition/#comment-6025644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fantastic read,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If they proceed to sale, this can turn out to be EPIC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LE9wEvLHeuQ" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LE9wEvLHeuQ"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ã˜rv</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Final Chapter: Yahoo Now Wants to Be Acquired by Microsoft</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/06/yahoo-microsoft-buy-acquisition/#comment-6025643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, they did want to sell earlier, but were asking for smoething like $37/share rather than the $31 or $32 that MicroSoft originally offered.  So this is a change of rhetoric, but not much of a change in positioning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Eltringham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Final Chapter: Yahoo Now Wants to Be Acquired by Microsoft</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/06/yahoo-microsoft-buy-acquisition/#comment-6025642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure it was just the financial crisis.  Monetizing its properties should have been a core competency/strategic capability.  That Yahoo needed Google to do this didn't inspire a lot of confidence in their turnaround plan.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Olverson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:06:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Final Chapter: Yahoo Now Wants to Be Acquired by Microsoft</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/06/yahoo-microsoft-buy-acquisition/#comment-6025641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Season changes so do people" ... For yahoo its better to be acquired by microsoft than do wither a lonely and slow death. If new season favored microsoft doesn't mean Ballmer is a good negotiator. And only time will tell if google is real winner or not .. Tech publication has always overestimated them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ninja</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:01:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>