<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_3134/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:38:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Neither is &lt;a href="http://beta.goofy2.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://beta.goofy2.com"&gt;http://beta.goofy2.com&lt;/a&gt; YATC. I have submitted G2 for your review and it is kind of similiar to Rejaw.&lt;br&gt;Check it out please&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://beta.goofy2.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="beta.goofy2.com"&gt;beta.goofy2.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kashgar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:38:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is ALPHA so you can only expect there to be lots of bugs &amp;amp; issues...... I say wait it out a few updates before starting to complain.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChaCha Fance</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 22:31:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pai,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're being too easy on these folks.  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rejaw isn't exactly a Twitter cloan; it's more of Pownce clone. It still doesn't have the stream feeling that Twitter gives me. Like others, I'm not sure it's got a place at this point in time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rejaw might do better if they can hold onto whatever share they can grasp right now and hope Twitter and others go by the way side.  It hasn't brought anything significant to the table to date that would make me drop any service in favor of Rejaw.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now if this had a coo, and perhaps nonlinear interface, say with spokes, bubbles, and slides, that would be something. Hey wait...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At any rate, your review has got people talking. Good job.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd Jordan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:14:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014410</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree this might be the only drawback, I like this one but still love twitter, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jan :-)&lt;br&gt;jantd on twitter&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jan Tallent</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:26:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like it so far - but unless they figure out the block feature, it has the potential to turn into troll heaven.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I got 4 whispers in a row in my inbox yesterday from someone I don't know. No way to delete, no way to keep from getting.&lt;br&gt;That's going to be a HUGE Achille's Heel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekMommy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree EJ. And the design is funky, too. But I think it's a great start. My review of it, for those who are curious, is at &lt;a href="http://shortn.it/sIB0" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://shortn.it/sIB0"&gt;http://shortn.it/sIB0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think we may soon see the Twitter killer come out if Ev and the boys can't turn things around asap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But this is built in Ruby, too.  Will it crash in a week?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Tobin at Ignite Social Med</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:15:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So far I like it. Anything is better than Twitter &amp;amp; Plurk!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChaCha Fance</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:46:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol. Yea, I know what you mean. I do think I might have been a tad too nice about them, huh? I rarely do such a positive tooth-achy sweet review. I will do me best to balance it more. In hindsite I would've ripped them more, especially about the name of the site as EJRaven pointed out. It will be hard for the name to catch on like twitter/tweet. Even Plurk is more fun to say. I think a good name should be able to go from a noun to a verb.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pai&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paisano®</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like rejaw but I still thin twitter is better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">I E MUSIC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:06:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm guessing the Mac client is coming first because they plan to launch an iPhone app next and can share that development.  Makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mdotbb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:05:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rejaw is Not Just Another Twitter Clone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/rejaw/#comment-6014400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I approve of Rejaw.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In fact, I like Rejaw a lot better than Twitter, but please, change the name to something much more memorable, the weird startup name is getting utterly old, very fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EJRaven</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:35:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>