-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/01/06/twitter-follow-fail/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 9 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
152 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
322 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
155 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
AT&T CEO Wants iPhone Users to Limit Usage
1 day ago · 172 comments
-
Facebook’s New Privacy Push Concerns Experts
13 hours ago · 50 comments
-
Facebook Is Down
7 hours ago · 22 comments
-
Burger King Beguiles Hungry Men With Shower Babe [VIDEO]
7 hours ago · 18 comments
-
Apple to Launch iTunes on the Web
15 hours ago · 42 comments
-
AT&T CEO Wants iPhone Users to Limit Usage
For fans of celebrities it may be the most appropriate word, but in every day social situations it seems only an appropriate word to describe a stalker.
Re. number 8, I remember someone I followed tweeting something like:
"Wow! I got another gazillion followers today, taking it to 2465.
Let's see if we can make it 2500 before midnight, shall we?!!"
My reaction? No actually, let's *not* see that. UNFOLLOWED.
Cheers!
followers,and only one update that just leads to some spam site that they have.
# your twitter updates are private
# all you ever do is retweet
# you don't use a real name for your twitter url or your twitter username
# I see lol, LOLZ, :) and ROFL appear all over your profile.
# your twitter username is something like organic_foods_uk
Now let's start the Top 10 Reasons I UNFOLLOWED you.
#1. Swearing. (I'm no prude but I hear enough of that on the bus and the street
without SEEING it on a community forum.) My feeling is if you can't say it at
playground, then don't say it on Twitter. And I often feel like DMing them to
TELL THEM why.
Am I just a dweeb or does this bother anyone else?
If you are, you're an idiot, because you're regularly pissing off half
of Twitter.
Zap - gone!
What a strange objection. Firstly, I disagree that mention of one's political views necessarily antagonises people with a different take - I like hearing the other side's POV if it's intelligently presented - be secondly, why the assumption that it's a bad thing if half of Twitter doesn't want to follow you? Surely the whole point is to find people with whom you have a shared interest, not to tweet so generically that no one could possibly be offended. I don't necessarily want all of Twitter to follow me - I want people who are interested in what I have to say to follow me.
If politics ain't you're thing... it's all good.
However it definately pushes me to stop following some that I followed only by "politeness".
My last tweet could be " "gone clearing up my following list" :-)
Those sites are my biggest peeve, sorry to rant. Great article though! Spot on!
some spam-ish link attached. If I don't follow you back, oh well, it's not a personal attack I swear!
And as far as the "auto dm's" go, some people just don't have the time to respond to every message. If what they are selling is something that you don't want to buy, then why were you following in the first place? Maybe so they would follow you back? It seems hypocritical to me to un-follow or not follow someone simply because they're selling something. Especially if they have a link in their bio or dm message. You knew what they were about when you visited their profile to click the "follow" button, didn't you? Why not? Why would you just follow someone without checking their stream and/or profile, but when they follow you first, they get all the scrutiny of you checking their dm's and streams after the fact? I don't put anyone down for whatever way they try to make money because I don't have to buy whatever they are selling....that's my choice. I definitely don't follow people just for them to follow me back. It's obvious that I don't agree with every point in this article(or comments), but, that's the benefit of living in such a wonderful country and time....I can do that.
But there´s a special case regarding to reason #3:
you´re linkin´ to an entry @WIKIPEDIA!
Regards from Germany
Thomas
I HATE Auto follows.
I am not part of your marketing strategy...you got sold on a "Twitter Strategy". You should have ranaway & just started a conversation w/your customers.
Those that don't get it, will fail. Survival of the fittest & those that "get it".
-jen
I think if Twitter survives 2009 we'll see more people have personal accounts and work accounts, like we do now for email (remember the days when you only needed one address?)
is to un-follow because I want to give almost anyone a chance. But, I regularly
go through my lists and un-follow the folks that are annoying me their own PR
and their constant selling of their own products.
close to an "Expert") Think of it as a party or a traditional business networking meeting in some hotel
ballroom, you're not going to talk about business 100% of the time and you certainly don't want to spend
all the time having singular conversations... it's about interacting and balancing business and personal.
Great points!
Just got this link on twitter and I found it super helpful (and a bit silly... which I love!).
I'm new to twitter and while I'm thoroughly confused so far... I have a feeling I'll be addicted in a week. I have even @replied 2 people... gasp!
Thanks,
http://elislids.blogspot.com/
followed back. I twitter for a nonprofit and read your post right after
browsing new followers acquired while i was offline over the holidays. It
helps me think about my own evolving follow policies. For example, I try
to give the benefit of the doubt to those who want conference news but haven't
figured out yet what they want in their profile, or what to tweet about.
I also try to protect the nonprofit's brand from guilt by association by
not following those whose twitter presence appears antithetical to the work
we're doing, and I'm not afraid to use the block button for egregious cases.
I also won't follow if you're salesy, salesy, salesy; and one time I declined a follow because the spelling was that of a drunken five-year-old -- nearly inscrutable in a hillbilly-but-not-a-good-hillbilly-sort-of way.
At the end of the day, however, I am put off by efforts to homogenize Twitter into dictating what it should and shouldn't be. I think the purpose of Twitter varies from person to personl For some it may be purely social. For others it may be more business oriented. Much of it depends upon the time and effort you have to put into it. Realistically you can only keep up with so many people and genuinely engage with them.
Not one forces you to follow anyone and I don't think anyone should be forced to follow back. Presumably you're attracting the people who want to hear what you have to say, no matter what you're saying.
It's not tit for tat, not this OR that, it's Twitter!
Sincerely,
Paula
I mean people might statrt using twitter, not having that many followers
but still having an interesting website/blog. Honestly it like in the party,
you should not judge people at the first glance.
Here's the link: http://www.becomingsomething.com/2009/01/my-twi...
Thanks for reaffirming some of my opinions. This was concise.
Hardly a sticking point in the grander scheme of things, don't you think?
Personally, it ticks me off if someone posts more than a few times a days. Some people post every hour. No chance.
Ironcially enough though, as somebody mentioned above, making lists about reasons why you don't follow people probably constitutes number #5 on the list. After all, it rings of the 'internet expert' you mention... Can't win 'em all I guess ;)
I'm sort of "addicted" to Twitter now (*sigh*) and Squidoo... as a former school teacher, photographer, and currently a writer... The folks I follow on Squidoo stimulate my creativity by commenting on things I wouldn't have thought about (but enjoy thinking about when they bring something up). I also follow folks who live where I've lived (so I can keep up with local news and some of my buddies from there), and places where I'd LIKE to live (so I can get an idea of what that place is like before I go there). I follow folks who have the same interests of mine (biology, medicine, health, fitness, FOOD, -did I mention FOOD?- travel, public relations, writing, editing, homeschooling, nature, environment). I try to avoid the political spewers... because like you said, sooner or later, at LEAST 50% of the folks will be pissed off by what's said.
Your post was well presented--it should be a part of EVERY business-person's education (as well as every engineer's or computer programmer's education). It's basic training for the socially inept.
Thanks for the great read!
My twitter peeve is people who say "Good Morning Tweeple!" Is is so geo-centric to assume
all of your followers are in your time zone. It may be evening in Signapore or Lo
London when you sit down at your computer. Twitter is not a CB channel.
Profile pages dominated by thanks-for-follows
Well-handled, but wrong subject area: e.g., I've got a follower who's an online gamer. I went to check out his profile page and I saw great posts, but they were all about gaming.. I'm not a gamer, so why should I follow?
Mindless, boring, useless chatter
Atherton, I found your article very well done. Following you now.
Shel Horowitz, author of Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First and other books
social media experts?
I bet it's the same number of experts who haven't heard of a site like Mashable.
Twitter is like going bargain hunting. You've gotta wade through a lot of crap
to find the really good stuff!
@Lagwolf: Why am I thinking yours won't be the last comment I read criticizing me of not following you in return?
@Wayne John: I know exactly the "slick willy one page sales sites" you mean. During Twitter's recent "spammer cleansing" I lost over 100 followers who I was not following in return, and nearly all of them "boasted" the layout of which you speak. Which, fine, if they're offering genuine content or a genuine service, but I find this is often not the case. Thanks for reading!
@Mark Riffey: I agree with you completely. As someone who tries to keep his Twitter stream balanced between retweeting content from other sites and sources and my own original content, I find the largely auto-post-feeds greatly offensive. Because, again, how does this effect engagement with your followers? It doesn't.
@Cormac Moylan: I completely agree with all of the points on your own fine list, as well, except for item number four, obvs, LOLz! ;-)
@David: Very valid point regarding profanity. Although I try to keep profanity to a minimum in my stream, it does exist, along with other perhaps non-playground-suitable language or concepts, so I could definitely see myself unfollowing someone based on that if I held similar beliefs as you.
@David Griner: I'm glad you enjoyed it, David, and thanks for your compliment. I completely concur with you that numbers five and six could weed out about 95% of Twitter's dregs right now.
1) The writer is extremely concerned with being on the "hippest" social media networks that he can find.
2) He believes that he is part of some elite force by doing so.
3) He probably has never had many real life friends, so he wants to take it out by insulting others and telling them that they're not cool enough for his spitter account.
4) He most likely has a history of low self esteem, as evidenced by the false bravado displayed in his writing.
5) He's one of the biggest dorks I've come across in quite some time.
Follow someone just because they're famous, and I'm probably not interested in you.
The only things I'd add are pet peeves, like your posts are always in all caps and they hurt my head, or you frequently write about things that disgust me, like the gentleman who reports his bowel movements regularly.
Good list, and I appreciate the conversation your post has generated.
of suggestion and innuendo and ##*!$@#. Not cool.
@Guillaume: Well, no, we *shouldn't* judge people at first sight, and in an ideal world (and on an ideal internet), perhaps we wouldn't. But in a world and on a media that both place so much emphasis not only on how one looks, but also on what one says or writes, and on the value of one's content, unfortunately it *is* a world and a media in which first-sight decisions are made. Hopefully my list takes that into account and offers second chances where second chances may be due.
@Natasha: I *loved* your post on your Twitter philosophy! I wrote a similar piece (which I now feature prominently on my blog, and as a link in my Twitter bio) because I wanted to allow potential followers to know what to expect if they decided to follow me; yours is far better than mine, however, at articulating your deeper philosophy behind how and why you tweet. More Twitterers, I think, should put as much thought into why they're there as have you.
@Venessa Paech: I couldn't phrased it more articulately (nor, clearly, more concisely) than you just did. I completely concur.
I like to follow people who are interesting, don't send dozens of tweets per day, and don't follow 43,000 people. I really, really enjoy people, but not all of them at once -- following too many overwhelms me.
So I don't follow if they don't tweet, if they tweet too much, and OMG! -- the ones who can't write coherently. I'm sorry. I just can't subject myself. I was a lit major and a spelling champ. It's too painful! Plus, that whole "I just need 683 more followers by midnight" thing is soooo pathetic.
I was following someone who had good info, fun links and was fun to follow.
Suddenly, Twitter had a DM phishing scam issue and this person posted tweet
after tweet after tweet all day and all evening about/on the issue with
graphics and how-to's, links...unrelenting informational "panic".
Yikes. Block.
My number 1 reason for not following someone:
Because I clicked your link and it was a screen size headshot of you and a
request to join your Facebook fan page.
I agree completely with all of your reasons in this article too.
from your article.
Also might be a good response to anyone you do end up 'un-following'
same kinda crap exists on linkedin.
With very few exceptions, I don't follow business-only feeds.
I do follow a lot of news and some purely serious bloggers, but
everything else has to have some personal appeal.
I generally don't follow anyone for long if they don't have a
humorous streak. I'm in it for the fun. Also, I hardly ever check
my followers list, so I only find out about new followers when
they @reply to me.
k, iz dun bein seerius, plai tiemz nao. cul8r kthxbai. =^..^=
@ 64 A.J. Pape: OMG. "Excessive unrelenting perkiness" is probably my #11, too!
@ 68 Sonia Martinez: I think you address an important point amidst all of your flattery (for which I thank you profusely! *wink*): Those times at which Twitterers can lapse out of their usual personalities into other moods. I know I do it frequently, and am constantly astounded when I don't lose followers after an evening of RANDOM SCREAMING TWEETS. I suppose that speaks more to the *general, overall* value that people offer in their content, as opposed to the occasional bouts of random behaviors.
@ 69 TrevC: Contrary to popular belief, my friend, those of us who write on the internet DO go outside occasionally to do fun things. For example, I have just now returned from smoking a cigarette on my front stoop, and I had a smashing fun time!
@ 85 @GaryPaulson: I'm glad you thought so, Gary, and thank you. I was definitely trying to make it as informative for new / unfollowed users as I made it humorous.
1. Contain forceful Views. (2 in your list)
2. Spammy. (8 in your list)
Thy will be removed and disposed of in a tasteful manner.
Why have 10? I think I just narrowed it down to 2.
I quit following people who ...
- make too many posts -- if I see 3 consecutive posts in my Twitter, I quit following that person.
- continue from one tweet to another -- if you can't make your message short, it shouldn't be on Twitter.
- announce blog entries -- if I want to follow your blog, I'll subscribe to your RSS.
- announce what they are eating, when they go to bed, etc.
I also use @spam @username to report spammers.
I also have to say I don't care to read people's tweets that are always cursing.
Not engaging also means not caring if you barrage followers about
how great your products or services are.
No Twitter hogs allowed.
The best way to market on Twitter is to under-market.
I blocked one just this very morning that was actually called (okay I've taken a few letters out) f***you.
Yeah.
a must and anyone I want to follow typically has a website or blog so that's a must
too.
don't keep them in mind. Such posts help really to make twitter more useful.
Not sure if it's indecent to say so, but someone who twitters too much and floods your feed as soon as you follow them is also a turn off for me.
It's fine to twitter regularly, but if it's drowning out my other conversations then I have to draw the line.
twitter user id: markingegno
http://is.gd/eLc1
doesn't mean I am an "expert" - it's simply my
way of sharing with those who've chosen to subscribe
to my blog. Many people do so! In fact I have
the grace to link to other blogs who talk about
Twitter tools without asking for anything back at
all! (So Atherton, were YOU talkin about me?)
"Your most recent updates make references
to any need to achieve “more Twitter followersâ€"
I've never committed this "Twitter SIN" but again,
many have done that including some pro bloggers
who've posted "I have another 3 to 3,000 here on
Twitter!"
Lighten up! There are worser "twitter sins" than
some youve mentioned! But yeah, those are YOUR
top 10 reasons not to follow - be it Twitter or
not.
When you receive too many of the same re-tweets
no matter how useful they are, may be that's
when you find another reason NOT follow! Your
11th reason. Happy twittering!
doesn't mean I am an "expert" - it's simply my
way of sharing with those who've chosen to subscribe
to my blog. Many people do so! In fact I have
the grace to link to other blogs who talk about
Twitter tools without asking for anything back at
all! (So Atherton, were YOU talkin about me?)
"Your most recent updates make references
to any need to achieve “more Twitter followersâ€"
I've never committed this "Twitter SIN" but again,
many have done that including some pro bloggers
who've posted "I have another 3 to 3,000 here on
Twitter!"
Lighten up! There are worser "twitter sins" than
some you've mentioned! But yeah, those are YOUR
top 10 reasons not to follow - be it Twitter or
not.
When you receive too many of the same re-tweets
no matter how useful they are, may be that's
when you find another reason NOT follow! Your
11th reason. Happy twittering!
- You have only @replies for the first page of tweets. I want to hear your original thoughts as well as what you say in reply.
- You have protected updates. I'm not going to follow and wait for a follow back before I can see what you say.
- You have chosen a garish or hard to read colour combination for you profile. I can't read your bio if it's dark grey on black.
- You have too many negative, whinging or complaining tweets. Sorry but negativity is a big turnoff.
Having said that - I don't want to be too negative myself! I am choosy about who i follow, but I find it lets me engage more closely with those that I do. I've had some really great conversations with those I follow.
If you'd like to say hi, you can tweet me at http://twitter.com/neilcreek
of "blocked follows" like the guy who asked me if I had piercings in private
places. CREEPY!!! Did not return the follow and promptly BLOCKED!
*superstar* tweeple because I get overwhelmed by the velocity of their updates.
I'm all for great conversations, but sometimes the old information overload
kicks in and I need to go zen for a while.
- who seek ways to ADD or CONTRIBUTE value
- who just don't get it.
#6 is the biggest reflection of this. It's really no different than the business networker who walks around a mixer with a fistful of business cards, handing them out to all passers-by, thinking that he's given any reason to be called the following day.
HOWEVER, consider that the path to success is not an elitist or critical attitude. Help others understand how to make their experience successful. (I know you do this in spades! And, thank you!)
Just like any other networking or communication vehicle, there will always be an MLM gal hawking herballife who doesn't get that you have to give before you get.
Follow, don't follow - it's up to you - make up your own reasons. Up until now, I haven't followed @ABartelby but I do subscribe to http://athertonbartelby.wordpress.com/, and his wife, @avflox , is a facebook friend and one of my favorite tweeters.
J Doss
Who cares?
1. You don't know the difference between Twitter and your blog. If it takes six tweets in a row to say it, it's a blog post. Write it there and link to it with one tweet.
2. You tweet so much that you're taking over my landing page -- and I'm following 150+ people.
3. You tweet the same message over and over in case someone missed it the first time.
Thanks for the great post.
@ 104/105 Kelly a.k.a. @qutequte: I saw a tweet of yours earlier today regarding my article and my "big head," but I assure you that if you got the sense that I was being big headed, snobbish, or elitist, it was totally done for humor value. So perhaps you should lighten up, my dear, as this was not meant as a critique of how you (or anyone else) uses Twitter. Everyone uses it in different ways, for different reasons; this piece was merely an expression of my personal opinions regarding returning follows. Love your tweets, by the way; happy Twittering to you, too!
@ 107 Neil Creek: I really enjoyed reading all of your useful additions to my own list, all of which I think are completely spot-on, and are definitely guidelines that I follow, as well. The difficult-to-read layout / color palette and the excessively whing-y / negative tweets are definitely big turn-offs for me if I see them when approaching someone's Twitter profile. (Even though I, um, have been guilty of both at one time or another throughout my internet tenure. Ha?!)
@ 112 David: Well, my friend, this certainly isn't the first time I have been referred to as "pompus [sic, btw] and elitist," so at least I'm being consistent! ;-)
I just got into Twitter recently and this is great advice. Thank you very much,
Julie
Meg
@ 117 Jeroen Mirck: You are so right on regarding language barriers, which I think, now that you mention it, should really be at the top of the Follow Fail list. How can you follow others and forge meaningful connections / communications with them if you don't all speak the same language? In the 140-character-defined realm of Twitter, language barriers are most definitely an issue.
@ 123 Tom Martin: Thanks for those additions to the Follow Fail list: I concur with every one of them, but especially number six, of which the arrival of the new year (un)fortunately inspired quite a few! Great blog post, by the way; thanks for the attribution!
@ 125 Jeff Marmins: Excellent points, my friend. Thank you very much for your valuable contributions to the points I tried to raise. Bravo!
@ 138 Ann R: I loved reading how you are utilizing your Twitter stream, because that is exactly how I (well, "ideally") attempt to utilize my own. I think that at least a little variety can make anyone's Twitter stream more interesting and engaging; very few people want to read a stream that's 100% project / product pimpage, 100% news, 100% personal, etc. An even mix is always the most engaging, in my opinion.
An ex is a has been and a spurt is a drip under pressure!
"friendship" is give and take, not take and take, or push and push!
Don't be a "squatter" "taker" "or loiterer". Pretty simple!
Thanks for summing it up so well!
Ten things to do when someone follows you in Twitter. Some of our points overlap, but I really like the ones I left ou, as it were, like the photo (lack of), and some of the points made in the commenst, eg by Justine "Let's see if we can make it 2500..." etc.
I think a common factor is people who are not interested in having a conversation, only in having an audience.
Thanks for it, AB!
Luca,
TheInternetWorker.com
Reason I will UNfollow you: Cluttering your tweetstream (aka timeline) w/ endless Thanks for following tweets - to multiple peeps, no less. Don't you understand that you clutter other people's timelines with that crap? That's what direct messages (DMs) are for! *sheesh*
You can follow me at @bizlady08. I do not do ANY of the things mentioned in the Toip 10 list.
Item 6 is a particular hate of mine. They have one tweet and it's "buy me". Ecch.
and wondered if anyone else thought the same.
Seriously, I'd tell my gfs that the world is
better if their bfs (or husbands) can be as
honest as you (or me...ahem!)
You've really earned my respect! Because
honesty is BIG with me! Even if it's
blatant honesty. I learn lesser with ppl
who are less honest!
Also I don't agree that Twitter is only conversation, and therefore needs equal relationships meaning everyone follows everyone back. I enjoy @zeldman, @hotdogsladies, @insooutso, @bcompton and @thedayhascome even though they will probably never follow me back. Sure, I'd love it if they did, but their jokes work regardless. Plenty of other people have followed back, and I love it, but I don't converse much with plenty of them such as @badbanana, @abigvictory, @MissRFTC, @nick, @Tony_D, @hoosiergirl, @wryredhead and @tj. I wish they were all as close friends as @kariedwards, @AprilSTL, @lemonchiffon, @missamymac, @krgaskins, @sugarjones, and @Astrogirl426, but they're not and that's OK. Twitter serves multiple purposes and community is only one.
I also won't usually follow someone who is following 1000 people, but only has 10-15 follows. Something has got to be up there.
http://blog.pixelita.com/58/top-five-ways-to-ge...
And a newfound one today, which you touched on: Twitterers using Twitter as their personal RSS feed with no updates other than "Blog posted at..." over and over. Gah.
a shower. I ate lunch. I pooped. @johndoe What did you have for lunch? I have
a headache. @janedoe Nice to know you pooped, too.
Seriously, way too many people do this and it's an instant unfollow.
I have to say this is one of the best articles that I've read in a long time. Totally spot-on and you really have an understanding of the word, "Community". If everyone thought like you did, Twitter would be a better place. I just found your website and can't wait to see what you have to say next.
Auto following does not make sense if you desire to take anything beneficial away from your Twitter experience.
There seems to be a lot of overly presumptuous twitterers lately and it can really stand to be put in check. I actually had someone recently tell me what I needed to Tweet and that I should not use DM features. Message to all: users are on all forms of social media for their own personal experience - not yours. Be respectful and never assume... you know where that gets you.
in Item 1. I tend to have lots of fun changing my avatar.
Unklar
had 16:
http://www.mdurwin.com/?p=242
I narrowed them down
from several dozen
I'd been posting for
new Followers on
Twitter.
If a twitterer's tweet stream is primarily composed of obscure @replies to other users with no meaning to me that I can discern, I find this a huge turn-off. I have to wade through that person's @replies to see their regular tweets to try to get some idea of the personality of the tweeter. If I have to wade through, say, 10 pages to figure out the few tweets that aren't @replies, this gets annoying very quickly AND I WILL NOT FOLLOW such a person.
People who excessively use @replies seem to think Twitter is a chat room. It is NOT. If they want to chat, go to AIM or an IRC channel. Twitter to me is about self-expression and humor. More than anything, I personally look for tweeps who tweet funny stuff that makes me laugh. I don't care if they don't use @replies and frankly, I would rather they did not.
For me, although I use a few @replies, I generally delete them by the end of the day so that my tweet stream stays relatively pure. Someone can easily scan my page and figure out if my humor is for them. They can scan my first page and get a good idea of who I am as a person.
This brings me to the final reason I will not follow someone back, assuming their tweets are funny and interesting. And that is if they tweet too often. Really, I don't want to hear from you more than 10 times per day, max. If you only tweet two or three times a day, for me this is even better. It's quality, not quantity!
But the number one thing I look for is @replies, and if you overdo them, I will NOT be following you.
I've included this in my blog. Thx.
http://pixelvoiceblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/twit...
Thanks for the info
@verywendy
Thanks for the info
@verywendy
Just sayin'.
Just sayin'.
If someone can't take 2 second to change the default avatar then they clearly aren't taking Twitter seriously.
2 Pretty much goes along with one. It only takes a moment to put a couple of lines in your bio. If this is too much work for someone why would I want to follow.
5 Ah yes the social media guru who has just been on Twitter for one month. How did I ever live before this guy came along?
If someone can't take 2 second to change the default avatar then they clearly aren't taking Twitter seriously.
2 Pretty much goes along with one. It only takes a moment to put a couple of lines in your bio. If this is too much work for someone why would I want to follow.
5 Ah yes the social media guru who has just been on Twitter for one month. How did I ever live before this guy came along?
Though to be fair, I do tend to give new starters a chance by waiting with my return follow until I can see some action of that twitter account.
Though to be fair, I do tend to give new starters a chance by waiting with my return follow until I can see some action of that twitter account.
I will no longer follow you if you frequently fill dead space with posts like "My left shoe feels like a green baboon today." - even if you are a social media "expert" AND a stand up comedian.
I will no longer follow you if you frequently fill dead space with posts like "My left shoe feels like a green baboon today." - even if you are a social media "expert" AND a stand up comedian.
Almost my entire internet presence is as a result of my work as the internet marketing director for a bricks-and-mortar manufacturing company. My work is not intended to necessarily actually result in direct sales - most of our sales are in the real world to retailers, but since our product, and the material it is made from, is not well-known in the English-speaking world, my work is to raise the profile of our company and our product's main ingredient.
I dont' know if I would go so far as to say that all my Tweets are "...always, only, about pushing [my] own service/product", but since I assume that anyone following me has an interest in our business or the plant (botanical plant, not manufacturing), I feel weird about posting non-business-related Tweets. Where is the line? I don't want to seem unprofessional by posting personal info, and I also don't want to bother people by tweeting all the time.
Maybe I just have more to learn about how Twitter is used.
BTW my Twitter name is Seabuckthorn, in case anyone is curious.
I don't think I'll follow you either.
®
consultants. I have no problem with them following myself, but reciprocating
will often start to spam your feed.
Ugh
And the one about people not yet having an identity... My opinion is that if you/we want participants, we should allow them to discover what Twitter is FOR THEM. That may take time, just like Blogging. There are some poor folk who are simply getting online for the first time... They need encouragement, not flaming.
Ah, but this was a great set of notes and observations.
e.
(2) @hannibal666 never unfollows anyone. Never Ever! Me promise. You may especially regret it if me find your tweets especially dim, dull or dumbass. @hannibal666 has memory like elephant! and me love to roast :P
(3) @hannibal666 retweets you if u retweets @hannibal666. Its reassuring to know where you
can sell your soul. Your friend in a time of need. You never know when it will be important to get the word out and then you will think of me @hannibal666
(2) @hannibal666 never unfollows anyone. Never Ever! Me promise. You may especially regret it if me find your tweets especially dim, dull or dumbass. @hannibal666 has memory like elephant! and me love to roast :P
(3) @hannibal666 retweets you if u retweets @hannibal666. Its reassuring to know where you
can sell your soul. Your friend in a time of need. You never know when it will be important to get the word out and then you will think of me @hannibal666
I appreciate when someone has a website/blog link (even if only Myspace) which I think is better then no link at all telling me who that person is...in good taste of course.
If you're going on about your religious beliefs, or even if you mention them in your Bio...no follow. I'm all thrilled that you've got a nice imaginary friend to talk to, but I dont need to hear about that on Twitter. Again, just doesnt fit with why I use Twitter.
I've never before read your column, nor have I ever heard of you. A link in some other blog brought me here.
This passage in your present essay caught my eye.
"We’ve all been there: You’re at a party hosted by that one fabulous friend, and populated with the best of your mutual circle of friends. The atmosphere is almost carbonated with excitement; the guests’ personalities flawlessly compliment each other; and the conversations that abound are infused with intelligence, caustic wit, and a wide variety of knowledge that ensures the complete absence of any pregnant, awkward pauses. Then, it happens: someone appears who just doesn’t…fit."
You've really touched me with this passage, for you see, I am that someone who appears who doesn't ... fit.
When I'm not removing the carbonated air from parties such as the one you describe, I can be found with my many friends. All are like me. You might be interested to know we have our own parties. And when we do, we sit near the walls with our heads down until it is time to return to our homes.
I wish you all the best.
s
~Watching {link to video on their site}
~Watching {link to 2nd video on their site}
~Watching {link to 3rd video on their site}
etc
I have a couple problems with this.
#1 I watch enough TV by myself, I don't need an update of what you are watching every 5 mins
#2 If it only took you 5 mins to watch that 45 min video, I guess it wasn't good enough for me to want to watch right?
#3 At least hand post it yourself so you can make some vain attempt to make each tweet look a little different.
Another favorite? People that follow you (so you get the follow message,) then must have unfollowed you (so their stats don't look one sided,) then they loose track of where they left off because you get a 2nd message from twitter (2-3 mins after the first message, sometimes less) letting you know they are following you again.
Nothing wrong about it. It's just like choosing who I'll be friends with in the real world.
Thanks for this one!
Certainly you should have a user avatar, but it doesn't have to be an actual photo of yourself. There are numerous people I follow who, like myself, use twitter partly anonymously. I still fully engage with followers, and they likewise, despite my true identity being somewhat hidden.
I seems a lot of social media oddities can be explained by reading Dr Seuss
-Chris
http://twitter.com/chriscade
There is plenty of advice on how to effectively tweet. A bit of research would help.
My favorite kind of thing tho, is all of the above, then they go for the "abusive" angle. Those get reported straightaway. I'll have none of that.
If you can't be nice... well... your out!
And... I do respond to all my tweets- it can take time, but well worth connecting. After all- isn't that what Twitter is all about. ;-)
Thanks again for the great piece of lit!
Adventure Girl
Dough I personally use these points more toward unfollow then not follow.
I also would add to unfollow/not follow peeps that has not posted no tweets/or is not active at all.
And peeps that keep send me commercial DMs without me requesting it, I will unfollow.
If you have nicknames like Iwantmoney or Iwanttoberich... equals no follow!
Cheers..
I realize social media is the latest technology that will only get worse...er, I mean better.
I am sucked into by way of default - being in the entertainment industry almost requires this to keep up with your peers, the media etc...
BUT if I had my choice I would NOT be on any of it.
Yes, really.
This whole be my friend, buy my product, don't be my friend and buy my product, watch me brag, lie and fool even myself. Or maybe someone needs more ego petting, has no life or actually has one and neglects the real, living breathing humans in it for the internet.
Whatever. It's all a waste of precious life time we all have so little of.
I would take an honest job at a farm everyday, with my family and friends and hobbies then a life in the fast lane (no, I don't mean famous people, I mean social media - it's fast) twittering, facebooking, myspacing and blogging what little time I have left away.
With that said, I will find a way to stay on my artistic path with more freedom than I feel I currently have. The internet has taken what little we have left, including our dignity.
Here's to hoping I can do just that - find a way off the hamster wheel (while still making a living without kissing the worlds butt, begging to be followed, not unfollowed...whatever) and onto solid ground.
Good luck out there everyone.
I hope you lead full and happy lives.
Life is short. Don't forget.
Oh and just think, when you die, eventually all of the internet presence you spent a painstaking amount of time on, will just disappear. You will have taken years off your life trying to document it for people who could care less about it or you.
One's twitter content and credentials should speak for themselves. (I am just beginning on twitter. More to come.)
But I do believe promoting oneself via a SocNet is pretty-much what everyone is doing all the time online. We all have something to sell!
--
Seen on mashable.com (?)
Leaves the follow kind of cold... there is no connection.
Thanks for putting things in perspective and verbalizing some of the things I think many of us are thinking and feeling!!! Joe
Before I follow anyone back, I read their profile, click on their link to see what they've got going on, and skim a page of their tweets to see if they are interesting/entertaining/informative or if we have anything in common.
Additional #followfail reasons: Their site is a sales/squeeze page for anything (I hate those); numerous tweets of the same content promoting their products/services; and any tweet mention of how many followers they have/need/want.
@AnnetteFix - Author of The Break-Up Diet: A Memoir
Do I auto-follow? Yes.
Do I use Twitter for marketing? Yes. It works, if used sparingly and intelligently.
Am I ALL about myself on Twitter? No. I talk to people and try to be social... but they don't talk back lol...
Am I gonna cry if you don't follow back? Probably not. An intelligent person realizes that following gobs and gobs of people is unrealistic. It would be like asking every person in a football stadium to ask you a question at the same time... By the time you've responded to 1 comment, you have 20 more!!! Anyway, good day to you, all the same. Your posts are always entertaining and I like your blog sir. Even if you don't follow me back, YA JERK....
Thnanks for the article and i hope you have an awesome Easter weekend.
I'll follow anyone,(within reason) that I kinda know something about, because of their Bio, they actually have a picture (which was hard for me to get mine on there) but i did.
Anywho, I'm just rambling on like I always do. Thanks for the top 10 reasons people don't follow you.
Luv ya,
patty (tweeterchic66)
I agree that having no user avatar presents often suspicion when they have 1,000 followers etc or no updates...
1) Their name is a dead giveaway for why they're on Twitter. For example: Last night a guy was tweeting several times about how he smoked something and it was tasty. Finally I realized he was talking about smoking a ham, not a cigar. I sent him a message, laughingly telling him how I had misunderstood him. This morning, I'm being followed by "cigar_seller" (or something like that). Yeah, right, I'm gonna follow you. You found me by searching for the word "cigar" and you don't even know me. I don't smoke!
2) Your tweets are all advertisements. Nope, sorry!
3) If I'm following you and you have a negative view of the world, I'm not going to continue. I get enough negativity and snark elsewhere. I want helpful, happy people. I'm sure there are groups of sarcastic people to hang around with; I don't want to, personally.
I'm sure I'll learn more after I've been on more than a few weeks.
I will keep these points of view in mind.
This is a good list. I would offer that #10 can sometimes be difficult to gauge based on public @ replies, as some people -- I would be one example -- tend to communicate with specific followers directly via DM or e-mail.
Best,
Tim Ferriss
Pura Vida,
Jose Castro-Frenzel
It would be a very kind gesture to add a small note in the post body specifying otherwise.
1) Feeds that have plenty of updates, but have still yet to move beyond that of the humble "sat watching tv" level of tweet.
2) I can't stand excessive punctuation(!!!!!) and text message spelling. I like to be able to read a feed without flinching.
3) To mirror others on these comment window, people who @reply and very very VERY little else.. aside from most probably "sat watching tv."
Sean (@seany85)
@Web20Empire
Thanks again.
Ollie
I am not deleting my myspace just because you do not like it. I would rather delete Facebook LOL
Current pet peeve is people who only tweet quotes. It's as if they've taken to reading Bartelby's (sp?) for quotes.
I feel an obligation to provide quality information for my followers. http://www.twitter.com/pjend in case you want to check me out.
I agree with every point you make. My issue is with the automated tweet that recurs multiple times within the hour, and the Twitterer is offline.
Just now I got a follow from someone with a username like "webmasterresource" or something similar, being interested in design/developing general web culture I followed back. I receieved an autoreply thanking me for the follow with the question, "Are you an expert Twitterer?" Naively I thought possibly it was an article, like this one even, about using twitter effectively, so I clicked on the corresponding link.
Too my dismay but not surprise, it was one of those horribly designed cheapo-car-salesmen-like web pages with all caps red and black text spewing garbage like: "IF YOU"RE NOT MAKING $X,XXX DOLLARS A DAY ON TWITTER KEEP READING" and "GET XXXXX AMOUNT OF FOLLOWERS IN ONE DAY/WEEK/MONTH."
Meanwhile this person(s) had around 130 followers and was following over 600.
I gave them a direct message in return stating "Oh I should have looked at your website assumed you were a designer/depeloper from your username, my error"
Thought this may have been a little rude, but I feel better now after reading this. Thanks.
I block questionable followers. I'd rather have fewer, quality followers who are actually interested in my content and perhaps retweet it to their followers than a whole bunch of people who add nothing to the discussion.
I really agree with the list, they are the indications of a user who is just there but not really really doing his social responsibility. Hence, I will not also follow that user.
Not because I personally switch between that and another site as my url, but because I really feel that that has nothing to do with the quality of the person, nor their tweets.
For some, their Myspace is much more popular than their personal sites(which may be listed there)
But I agree on all the other points, and have been doing the same already for a long time now.
1. Twitter is just a suck-bag publicity stunt that will soon be a has been.
2. People on twitter think we actually care what they are doing.
3. 99.999999999% of twitter is spam
4. Twitter is just a mini-version of MySpace or other social networks with nothing worth getting hyped about.
5. Who the hell are you anyway?
6. Nevermind, I can care less who you are.
7. I don't need people knowing what the heck I'm doing 24/7
8. The entire twitter site looks like it took under 24 hours to program by some noob off of getafreelancer.com
9. Scratching my hind end is more exiting than using Twitter.
10. Twitter sucks. We all know it does but it's so populated by little grade-schoolers and fat 40 year old losers that live in their mother's basement that it appears populated by more than 99 percent of the earth's population. ...So the media eats it up because those are the two demographic properties they look for in "boobs that will buy anything".
You're boring.
If you can't figure out how to be entertaining in 140 characters or less, get off twitter.