<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in &amp;#8220;Groundbreaking&amp;#8221; Social Networking Patent at Auction</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_2533/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 02:42:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Groundbreaking&amp;#8221; Social Networking Patent at Auction</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/31/social-network-patent/#comment-5975349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You guys are right that an idea alone cannot be patented and thats also clear with the USPTO - the invention has to be backed by a technology to enable it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 02:42:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Groundbreaking&amp;#8221; Social Networking Patent at Auction</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/31/social-network-patent/#comment-5975348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;roflmao, this as stupid as saying I own a patent on how to chew gum.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:33:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Groundbreaking&amp;#8221; Social Networking Patent at Auction</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/31/social-network-patent/#comment-5975347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The thing is, defending against a patent lawsuit is so expensive that many companies would rather pay bonus "license" fees than pay out the $2MM, spend months or years in court, and hope that the judges et al are savvy enough to understand that there's no infringement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Strackany</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Groundbreaking&amp;#8221; Social Networking Patent at Auction</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/31/social-network-patent/#comment-5975346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure we can all name 10 sites that had similar or precursor functionality long before 2001.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even if the patent is valid I wouldn't think it would mean all social networks would have to shut down. That would be like saying, "Ford built the first automobile and patented it, so it is illegal to make automobiles unless you are Ford." Every social network has it's own version of those ideas... which were taken from other companies... which were taken from pre-web ideas, and so forth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thus the old saying: "There are no original ideas."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wade</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:47:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Groundbreaking&amp;#8221; Social Networking Patent at Auction</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/31/social-network-patent/#comment-5975344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Prepare to all be sued! :-(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Danny Tuppeny</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:22:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Groundbreaking&amp;#8221; Social Networking Patent at Auction</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/31/social-network-patent/#comment-5975343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I too have a tough time understanding how it is even possible to patent a set of ideas that describe how social networks are created and implemented. Can the owner of the patent declare violation of the patent by the numerous networking sites currently putting these ideas to use on their own initiative? It seems rather absurd that such a patent would be allowed, as this will only lead to unnecessary conflict and harm to existing and valued social networking sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Mothner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Groundbreaking&amp;#8221; Social Networking Patent at Auction</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/31/social-network-patent/#comment-5975342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an outrage. You cannot patent ideas, it even says so at the USPTO. You can patent physical things, like a car part or whatever. But software is a grey area and this patent isn't even that, just the concept of a social network.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, if someone gets hold of it and tries to wield it against every social network, that's just not going to work. Also, it's highly possible this "patent" is invaded because so much prior art exists. &lt;a href="http://Classmates.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Classmates.com"&gt;Classmates.com&lt;/a&gt; came out 6 years before that patent and more or less has similar features.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CountRob</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Groundbreaking&amp;#8221; Social Networking Patent at Auction</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/31/social-network-patent/#comment-5975341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just another example of why the patent process needs to be overhauled.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Willis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:43:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>