-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2007/12/11/rogers-not-net-neutral/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
151 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
152 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
13 hours ago · 112 comments
-
MySpace Shuts Down imeem and Its App Community
1 hour ago · 13 comments
-
Redbox: The Enemy of the Entertainment Industry? [STUDY]
4 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
9 hours ago · 24 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
12 hours ago · 32 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
As long as they don't start shoving in ads, or modifying the content of the page, and give me a way to close/hide their message, I'm all for it.
It's better than being charged the $1.50 per partial gig once you go over the limit.
And yes, I'm with Rogers.
The design could use a bit of an improvement, and be a bit smaller, maybe some thin bar across the top that the user can click on and expand, so that it doesn't take up half of the screen.
When they start adding ads, redirecting you from Google to Yahoo (they have a partnership) or start censoring the content on the page, then I have a problem.
I would rather have this, than find out through my next bill that I owe an extra $50 on my "unlimited" cable internet bill.
And yes, maybe they should email you, but I bet a lot of their users (like myself) don't use their rogers email address (mine is something like cjlebel2341234523452@rogers.com ...). At least this way the user can't use the excuse that they had no idea that they were over, and they don't end up with a surpise bill.