<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Mark Cuban&amp;#8217;s YouTube Love Affair Continues</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_24503/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:33:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mark Cuban&amp;#8217;s YouTube Love Affair Continues</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/07/mark-cubans-youtube-love-affair-continues/#comment-5923709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very funny...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hate to say it, I agree with Mark though.  There is better video services out there and since Google took over most of the videos I watched or bookmarked have been taken down...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Buell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mark Cuban&amp;#8217;s YouTube Love Affair Continues</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/07/mark-cubans-youtube-love-affair-continues/#comment-5923708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;Itâ€™s like a Donald Trump versus Rosie Oâ€™Donnell feud for the tech blogosphere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And about as interesting...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Devlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:58:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mark Cuban&amp;#8217;s YouTube Love Affair Continues</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/07/mark-cubans-youtube-love-affair-continues/#comment-5923707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark's beef with YouTube could be called pivoltal if not historic. The fact is that YouTube is a free black market and no company can compete as long as they do not obey the law and throw their Google money weight around. It's worse than anti-competitive, it sets the stage for destroying business in age of digital communication. If any company can come along and give everyone else's products away, then get bought by a megacorp which still breaks the law then no intellectual property is safe. If you don't prosecute Google/YouTiube oir at least hold them accountable for moderating all uploaded content (as a studio would be expected to do) you might as well get rid of copyrights and trademarks altogether. If you don't then you are unfairly creating a monopoly by allowing pirates to do whatever they want while businesses are not held accountable for the same behavior. There is no defensible position for Google. What they are doing is illegal and bad for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake Lockley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:37:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>