<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_23997/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 01:19:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-aquantive/#comment-5946486</link><description>&lt;p&gt;seems like you're missing the seminal acquisition - AOL buying &lt;a href="http://advertising.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="advertising.com"&gt;advertising.com&lt;/a&gt;. I think that Yahoo and MSN were reacting more to that deal than to Google's acquisition of Doubleclick. If you're interested, I've posted more at the Lightspeed blog - click on my name in this comment to read it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremy liew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 01:19:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-aquantive/#comment-5946485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is what I wrote over at TechCrunch (I am JadeBeijing)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Avenue A / Razorfish is a strong agency, and if they had simply purchased them for a reasonable price, Iâ€™d say go on, but $6 bil for aQuantive? Thatâ€™s a lot oâ€™ bling. Of the four deals (Google/DC, Yahoo/RM, WPP/24/7, Microsoft/aQ) I think they rate this way:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Yahoo/RM - Right Media is making cash hands over fist, and I think this was a steal for Yahoo.&lt;br&gt;2. Google/DC - was overpriced until today, should help them sort some things out.&lt;br&gt;3 (a tie) WPP paid a lot less, but aQ has better overall parts (esp. Atlas and Avenue A/Razorfish)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chad Catacchio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 13:23:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-aquantive/#comment-5946484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another thing is that the big battles of the next two years will probably be on video, geo-targeted advertising and location based services, and perhaps facing the diminishing pageviews of online apps (ajax, apollo, flex, widgets,...).&lt;br&gt;In other terms, buying &lt;a href="http://laurentk.tumblr.com/post/2095428" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://laurentk.tumblr.com/post/2095428"&gt;$1.2Bln worth of revenues (more or less)&lt;/a&gt; for over $10 Bln without concentrating on those issues might be risky, no ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laurent Kretz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 13:04:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-aquantive/#comment-5946482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To clarify:  "This" refers to Microsoft's purchase, not the post.  Great post!  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ANP</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:57:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-aquantive/#comment-5946481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is idiotic and bubble-esque.  MSFT operating from a place of fear = stupid buying decision.  See also:  &lt;a href="http://xoxoanp.com/online_marketing/hello-clark-kokich/248" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://xoxoanp.com/online_marketing/hello-clark-kokich/248"&gt;Guy who runs Avenue A / Razorfish rides the short bus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ANP</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-aquantive/#comment-5946480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The amazing thing is that $10.652 billions have been spent only from Apr06 to May07 ....&lt;br&gt;Wow. Google's yearly revenues equivalent spent on capex only in the industry of online advertising ... Let the battle begin !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remember when Gates said internet would never take off ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laurent Kretz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:53:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-aquantive/#comment-5946479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, added to the list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stan Schroeder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:30:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-aquantive/#comment-5946478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sheesh when somebody buy a startup I created.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh! I need to create one first, of course. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ali</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:21:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Billions: A Brief History of Ad Network Acquisitions</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-aquantive/#comment-5946477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft spent 200 million for In-Game Advertising company Massive in May 06.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:14:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>