<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_2310/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:08:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Theodoros</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kristen,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Times story is referencing funding information from more than a year ago. Per my comment in the article, Facebook has raised more than $37 million in venture capital to support our growth, including systems operations. We now have several data centers with thousands of servers and, of course, our investors have a stake in the company.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brandee Barker&lt;br&gt;Corporate Communications&lt;br&gt;Facebook&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brandee Barker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you read the article it says that this took place a year ago.  This is completely possible given that Facebook is one of the largest photo storage companies on the net.  What others inferred from this article was that they did it recently to handle the recent upsurge in traffic.  This is not the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So sad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">enc ee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:04:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The article is still up at timesonline, they just seem to have changed the URL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The URL is &lt;a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1898544.ece" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1898544.ece"&gt;http://technology.timesonli...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pinni</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:59:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1898544.ece" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1898544.ece"&gt;http://technology.timesonli...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The story is back again, check this link. It says Facebook tried to sell it more than a year ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Veerabadran</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:20:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;story is true, I bought them :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RYK</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:46:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting that this story was pulled.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Times is owned by MySpace owner, Rupert Murdoch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Nixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:49:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find it an unlikely story.. I have no idea how facebook monetizes, or what their revenue is but like Marcus said, hardware is fairly cheap these days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Big question is where this rumor came from, is Mark maybe testing out the market for FB shares?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:38:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kirsten I did a google search, it does say this fact in Times article. &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/yvpzzl" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/yvpzzl"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/yvpzzl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It says the following brief message there, I thought Google will cache the whole article but even a little snippet mirrors what you are saying.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The owners of Facebook, the fast growing social network, were forced to sell a significant share in the company because they did not have enough computers ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Veerabadran</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:26:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If it is true, it is time for Facebook to sell it to Google, they have plenty of servers and money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Veerabadran</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sounds unlikely. ~$100m would sure buy a lot of servers! ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus Greenwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Sold 10% of Shares?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/12/facebook-sold-shares/#comment-5950556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;on facebook blog they already said before the F8 event that they have 160 TB of storage and 60TB are extra.. i don't know if there are other hardware needed other than server, storage, back-up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">web lockr</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>