<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_1984/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:37:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-8075861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you want best videos.To see this site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nagarajan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:37:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I applaud Saha, Mark, and Sophie in regards to Barefootmeg and Linda.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both of these Bitches need to get a life and not only look stupid here but also on Multiply.&lt;br&gt;That thread in MUDS was only posted to stir the shit and these Bitches who don't even work for Multiply are just as useless there are they are here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only back down once confronted and try to act smart but in reality sit on their fat asses with the same stupid ass head shots repeating the same garbage as they sit only Multiply 24/7.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is amazing to me how these few comments from these Bitches brings out their true colors and these following quotes made me laugh as many have been saying the same thing about these fake bitches for a long time...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;" i donâ€™t appriciate feeling personally attacked" - Its just how Linda likes to try and portray herself as someone in command. Reality is a scary thing as she becomes someone else on the Internet - Sad life for a Trailer Trash Bitch isn't it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;" i canâ€™t believe people get so worked up over websites when there are bigger things OFFLINE that really matter and need the discussion." - Thats because these Bitches have NO OFFLINE life! Kinda obvious since they sit online all day and night.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"When you look at what Drupal is, and what it looks like out of the box, you can definitely have a great appreciation for what theyâ€™ve done with it and what theyâ€™re trying to accomplish." - Your talking to Bitches that don't even know what Drupal is (I'm sure they are going to Google it now) and proof of that is the next response from Linda that "she" wasn't the author of the MUDS thread.  Typical stupid ass comment from someone clearly over their heads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Silly Multiply developers. Obviously offended them, WTG Saha (applause). Itâ€™s one thing to defend their product, itâ€™s another to be such children about it and if youâ€™re not developers, I think itâ€™s safe to say youâ€™re a bunch of losers. You 3 women should be ashamed of yourselves." - None of these Bitches work for Multiply or could even begin programing/developing.  It is safe to say they are a bunch of losers and should be ashamed of themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;lets see if Linda posts these comments on MUDS as she has already acted like "I showed them" with her silly-rabbit comments on Multiply.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Suggestion for Linda: Get a job. Posting on Multiply isn't one. Eat Less and get out more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best Quote:&lt;br&gt;"Oh and Linda, it doesnâ€™t take a rocket scientist to figure out what was taken as a personal attack. Youâ€™re either an idiot or extremely irrational."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS - I'm glad Barefootmeg (fitting name by the way) was smart enough not to embarrass Multiply by honestly saying: " i havenâ€™t seen any multiply developers here on this thread" something Linda needs to get used to saying in Multiply.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Web</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Silly Multiply developers. Obviously offended them, WTG Saha (applause). It's one thing to defend their product, it's another to be such children about it and if you're not developers, I think it's safe to say you're a bunch of losers.  You 3 women should be ashamed of yourselves. &lt;a href="http://muds.multiply.com/journal/item/810/OnSugar_better_than_Multiply/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://muds.multiply.com/journal/item/810/OnSugar_better_than_Multiply/"&gt;http://muds.multiply.com/jo...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;I happened to like the whole "click on the sexy pink button" part of her demo.  Go be serious bloggers on that waste of space site you all know as Multiply.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OnSugar looks like a fun site, at the least, it has some personality unlike Multiply and they have a lot of potential being that they do already have a fan base from their other sites. &lt;br&gt;And Saha is right, for the amount of time Multiply has been around they should have more, especially when there are sites like Vox around.  There is no competition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've taken a look at your personal blogs on Multiply and you women obviously don't understand the concept of web design and it justifies the reason you all feel the desire to defend something so minor, you would think Saha slept with your significant other at the rate you were attacking her.  Creating a blog about this?  You've got to be kidding me!  If you know a certain site is awesome, it doesn't matter what one person has to say about it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh and Linda, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what was taken as a personal attack.  You're either an idiot or extremely irrational.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Team Sugar FTW!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sophie Lanias</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:21:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Multiply sucks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oregon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:58:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By the way, I took a look at your thread over at MUD... it isn't quite fair to say that OnSugar copied a bunch of other socnets, as was mentioned several times.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As is mentioned earlier in the comments here, it was built on the Drupal codebase.  When you look at what Drupal is, and what it looks like out of the box, you can definitely have a great appreciation for what they've done with it and what they're trying to accomplish.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:51:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that the main difference here is that Multiply functions more as a socnet and content aggregation service, and OnSugar is meant to be more of a content origination service.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Multiply also has a much more techy/savvy look and feel.  I don't see them as competing, they're attacking two separate markets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words, the girly appearance is on purpose.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:34:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;look this is silly.  i'm 30 years old, maybe not your age but i'm a 'grown up' as well.  i don't appriciate feeling personally attacked because I happen to like a certain site.  this post was not intended to threaten anyone nor were any of my comments.&lt;br&gt;i'm not going to go back &amp;amp; forth on what site is better and compare their features because it's pointless, you obviously have your biases and quite frankly, all of this is really not that serious.  i can't believe people get so worked up over websites when there are bigger things OFFLINE that really matter and need the discussion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saha</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:28:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Saha... that was just for the sake of discussion. Sorry I didn't come out in full praise of all I saw. As you say, to each their own : )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tint</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:21:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;meg was confused as to why pai brought up the whole mashing of social media services and i provided examples.  if you choose not to use flickr b/c they're associated with yahoo or onsugar because the pink, girly scene isn't for you, to each their own.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saha</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Saha, you mention Twitter and Flickr in the sidebar. I know a number of Multiply users who have those in their right rails with no problem. Yes, it isn't with one click, but then, I'm one of those who likes to control how things are put on my page, so I never go the 'one click' route anyway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I stay far away from Flickr anyway. It belongs to Yahoo ('nuff said) and Multiply has such a great photo storage facility, why use a 3rd party site?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tint</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:33:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The pink is an instant turnoff to me. It appears to be a girlie site. I rank it with MySpace's glitter... yes, I know it is just a perception, but I want my site to look good in every way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see a reference to 'followers'. Does that mean it is like Blogger where you don't add a contact, but have to follow people? I don't enjoy that at all. It makes for clumsy networking, but again, it is just my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tint</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:28:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you for your input meg!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;if i'm not mistaken i don't think multiply allows you to mash up social media services.  with onsugar you can add twitter and flickr to the sidebar of your blog with a click of your mouse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I strongly feel that there is NO comparison between multiply &amp;amp; onsugar.  imo, onsugar is just beginning their journey and already ahead of what multiply has done.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;onsugar's commenting system allows you to comment &amp;amp; subscribe to the comments on a particular post, I'm sure we'll be able to leave audio and video replies soon (personally, i wouldn't use it b/c i feel it's quicker to just type up something).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As far as what onsugar's privacy options are, I haven't seen any privacy settings yet.  You can make your updates unpublished but I do know for a fact that they have some really exciting features up their sleeves.  so i'm sure we'll be seeing that soon!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saha</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The reason OnSugar "might appeal more to women" is that it's from the people who run PopSugar and a bunch of other sites for women:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://changingway.org/2008/10/10/on-onsugar/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://changingway.org/2008/10/10/on-onsugar/"&gt;http://changingway.org/2008...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:28:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, man.  One more social content/media/networking place I have to check out. :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melanie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish Sweet Looking Blogs OnSugar (Video)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/10/onsugar/#comment-6022386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much for the kind words! Let us know if we can answer any questions you might have. Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sabs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>