<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_1959/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:19:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome Pete! I love this site and read it several times each day. Great, short, informative snippets of what's new.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">1TrackMine</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:19:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Probably should stay undiscovered with the bland quality of content available at Mashable, while other bloggers who create real content are overshadowed.  Pity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mashable-Bland</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fixed, thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:33:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Finding &lt;a href="http://Mashable.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Mashable.com"&gt;Mashable.com&lt;/a&gt; is one of the best things I've EVER discovered online.&lt;br&gt;~beth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beth Chapin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:17:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975230</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who knows, if they look hard enough they might discover a few more undiscovered sites, like Myspace or YouTube.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mashable is right up there with techcruch and slashdot, even better I think. Alexa rank = 1,192, hardly undiscovered.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CountRob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:03:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I thought that was the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975228</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Pete, thanks for linking back to our story. I can assure you your inclusion is meant to be flattering; I'm a big fan of the site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding some of the other comments, our audience is spread over a very broad demographic, and my goal every year with this story is for the majority of our readers to be unfamiliar with most of the sites on the list. Based on reader feedback so far, we've accomplished what we set out to do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It'd be close to impossible to craft a list of 100 brilliant Web sites that the Mashable community hasn't heard of, but hopefully even the most wizened web surfers among you still saw a few unfamiliar URLs on the list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kyle Monson&lt;br&gt;Associate Editor&lt;br&gt;PC Magazine&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kyle M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:52:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hah...what's their #1 undiscovered site: WordPress? They seem out of touch with the blogosphere. Your Toolbox series is simply the best, as well as everything you do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Grateful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey pete, great work :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any mention is a good mention :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Sam&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:19:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975225</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's hard to believe that with 114K RSS subscribers that Mashable is "undiscovered". :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:58:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how did we not make this list???  :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trade games GURU</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:14:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have to think in terms of the target audience and the general consumers.  To them, anything other than Google and Yahoo are pretty much undiscovered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;99% of the people I know off-line don't know what the heck Mashable or Techcrunch are.  To them, most sites we know like the back of our hands are undiscovered, even though they use the Internet everyday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jimmy Huen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:48:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think they have a broad definition of 'undiscovered'.  Some of these sites have a pretty high alexa ranking and millions of users.  thats undiscovered?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msthilaire</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;114k rss readers and its undiscovered hahahah&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bob cobb</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:55:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975219</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I found a few sites on this list that I've been regularly using for a few months.  I wonder how they decide whether a site's been discovered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FYI Pete - PC World, which you credit in your post, is not the same as PC Magazine, where the article is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruan Caiman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:25:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think they even took the time to put that list together... most of the sites on there aren't even worth mentioning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brandon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:17:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mashable should be in Top 100 Popular sites not in Undiscovered sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:35:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow/0,1206,l=213934&amp;amp;pg=0&amp;amp;s=25234&amp;amp;a=213919,00.asp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow/0,1206,l=213934&amp;amp;pg=0&amp;amp;s=25234&amp;amp;a=213919,00.asp"&gt;http://www.pcmag.com/slides...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">micropat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975215</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can access them direct, but it automatically runs the slideshow regardless.  Fairly annoying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:31:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable is a &amp;#8220;Top Undiscovered Site&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/30/mashable-is-a-top-undiscovered-site/#comment-5975214</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do you have to go through a slide show of all 100 sites, one at a time, to access any single site? Who designs shit like this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:22:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>