<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_19275/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:28:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-8195901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great party!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wish I could be there!&lt;br&gt;Nice post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">otimização de sites</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's probably dependent on the depth of the recession, and how much immediate monetization is on the horizon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If/As the market gets worse, the ad industry (and others as well) will probably become less probably short term. Additionally, there will be an increased cash crunch, which may force bigger firms with solid monetization plans to go to VC's for funding, which may leave less funds available for startups - especially the ones with no business model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I expect to have a harder time with funding if the recession increases&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Jaeger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Magnusdopus:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you will all be suprised by CHI.MP&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's just my guess. They have quite a different approach, compared to all of the other Identity management apps out there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it's more about getting interest going then actually ROI up front. Also ROI may not happen for a good 1 - 5 years after launch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Joe&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JoeDeveloper</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was extremely Impressed seeing da way c0ol PartyPix of yer Web2.0 Pawty from Pete on Facebook* These aren't yer Star Wars Convention Internet Geeks crawling upstairs from their Parents unfinished Basement! ;)) These are RockStars!! Pete Doherty + Babyshambles Eat yer Heart Out! I can't believe Kate Moss was there too!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;;))&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It used to be my Dream to shoot a TechCrunch Party but Screw that - I wanna Shoot a Mashable Party!! Preferably in Ibiza onboard Paul Allen's Yacht*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;+ thx fer reminding me to Not Get a Real Job!! Yer Keeping the Dream Alive* p.s. I only need a Lousy $Million***********&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillyWarhol</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:48:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice event, I love the way geeks like me partying .. keep up \oo/ M! rocks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">youporn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:01:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam, very thoughtful response.  Wondering if CNET was just upset bc they couldn't have a rocking party! \m/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lynn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:21:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I fall in line with Dave. A little cash and very creative minds will be the next cycle of killer startups.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kris</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:54:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The hand gesture we're using isn't "the shocker" as that is your index, middle finger and pinky extended.  The one on our stickers is kinda of a cross between sign language for "love" and the hand gesture everyone throws at rock concerts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean P. Aune</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure about Pete's sticker but didn't the collegehumor guys trademark the shocker hand gesture?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;done&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely agree! Without variety there is no competition. Without competition there is no evolution. Innovative ideas will win at the end.... if they can sustain the recession.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dan Kogan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://HealthWorldWeb.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="HealthWorldWeb.com"&gt;HealthWorldWeb.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Kogan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:05:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001733</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been wrong before but even back during the Web bubble, you usually had a functional site before you threw your first party.  If &lt;a href="http://chi.mp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="chi.mp"&gt;chi.mp&lt;/a&gt; investors are not livid with &lt;a href="http://chi.mp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="chi.mp"&gt;chi.mp&lt;/a&gt; founders for the party's ROI (not ROH-return on hype), then there's something wrong with the investors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">magnusdopus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:03:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was Our Party the Height of Web 2.0 Irrational Exuberance?  We Wish.</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/04/25/dotcom-bust/#comment-6001732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Adam!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  .. were you planning on giving me photo credit for that shot of pete?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:43:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>