<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_19260/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:39:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-10515484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are several ingredients it takes to be a successful musician:&lt;br&gt;• Incredible musical talent&lt;br&gt;• Charisma, good looks, charm... all the things it takes to have people want to listen to you&lt;br&gt;• Endurance. Think of all the early years that musicians spend writing songs, band practice, organising gigs, hauling all their s*** to places far and wide to play their songs, slowly getting exposure, etc, etc. It is not easy to 'make it' in the musical world and that one little carrot that hangs in their faces is the one piece of hope that keeps the industry turning out great stuff. &lt;br&gt;When all those ingredients combine, don't you think they deserve a little credit? To say they're lavish and indulgent (a.k.a Lenny Kravitz) is judging a life you'll never live. What is it like to have to live indoors because the paparazzi is up your a**? If this answer is 'I don't know' then you're not really fit to judge how that person spends their money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tori</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:39:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-7623859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think its not good to put tax on these cases..Its against the entire music lovers..&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lynamtax.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.lynamtax.co.uk"&gt;Offshore Disclosure&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Offshore Disclosure</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:27:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Youre forgetting about independent musicians that piracy is killing because they invest the little money and time they have in themselves to make a product that someone might want, and people just steal it... so the artist is unable to get a first step forward financially. There are alot of great artists out there with wonderful recordings and songs that are being choked out by people who just want to take because they can... without consideration for the time, effort and money that goes into the creation of the music, especially when every penny counts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ThinkAboutIt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, here is a real breakdown what Stan so ignorantly writes about; &lt;a href="http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2008/07/uk_ministers_ba.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2008/07/uk_ministers_ba.php"&gt;http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2008/07/uk_ministers_ba.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">reid Sheldon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stan, I would like to know what made you qualify to write an article on this subject? Do you work in the music industry? and it would have also made sense to link your past article to this post so we know where you coming from.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Payam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:32:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012759</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Germany does that? You mean the country that's tried to take over the entire world TWICE in the past 100yrs charges a crazy tax like that? Well I'll be damned. What is the world coming to?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:37:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't see that it matters how much money some musicians make. Taxing the web would be a bad idea even if all musicians were really poor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also: what about porn? That is intellectual property as well, and there's A LOT of it being downloaded out there...I've been told, by a friend. At least it would be funny seeing the goverment trying to decide who should have the most money: the producers of "Butt Pirates of the Caribbean" or "Scat Monsters III".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel B</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:01:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012757</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Allen Stern had it wrong the other day - don't click on ads, just get governments to impose a fee to then redistribute to bloggers.  There's load of copyrighted blog content that's shared, I dare say some of it illegally, by millions of people every day.  I bet some RIAA employees even redistribute blog content illegally, with company computers no less!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The gov't should collect $50/year - only $5/month from each ISP per user - and set up a blogger fund.  Bloggers would get paid from this proportionally to the amount of content they create (not how much is 'stolen', just created).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whaddya all think?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Kimsal</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:47:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I say we put a tax on ISPs and give the money to educators who are seeing their wages constantly being pushed lower, with costs increasingly skyrocketing. No Child Left Behind and all that crap does nothing for teacher's pay, and why should we be catering to musicians who are GETTING PAID TO PLAY MUSIC!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This country needs to invest more money into the people that help to shape our future, instead of pandering to the music industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Wise</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:32:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very easy, check bittorent transfers to piratesbay, mininova ect sites and you've got 60% caught.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Prometheus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:00:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not only are lawmakers incapable of doing this in a fair and just way for all intellectual property around the 'net, but what about those who pay, at least in some way, for all the media and sofware they consume? I make it a point to support artists, moviemakers, and programmers because I am a programmer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Therefore, lawmakers are going to punish those who download leagally and those who download legally equally? That will only cause all who actually purchase media to become jaded and either stop consuming, or hyper consume for free.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is completely vapid, and I cannot believe lawmakers are actually considering it. Plus, 30 pounds is absolutely exorbitant.  2 USD/month distributed directly to the artists would end up being MORE THAN THEY CURRENTLY MAKE FROM RECORD COMPANIES. I can't remember the exact statistic, but I think it goes a little like Radiohead made an average of 2.15 USD per album on In Rainbows when they gave it away as 'donationware.' That's more than 15 cents they would have made per album sale just by cutting out the middleman. Does anyone see a problem with how top-heavy and cumbersome our media outlets have become? Everyone wants a pound of flesh from these artists, and from the people. I cry outrage!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ipay4myMedia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:57:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think you're correctly communicating the plan. It doesn't suggest taxing everyone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It will use ISP's to send letters to downloaders based on their internet habits. People could pay the tax and then download music.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't imagine a blanket tax on everyone could possibly have been the suggestion. We're slightly more progressive than that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:45:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just shows that people aren't using the web space in a creative way.  Musicians have personal brands, and if they don't know how to use a cheap medium, i.e. the internet to promote their stuff, they aren't thinking straight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This just looks like a step in the wrong direction.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle Greer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:18:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How is is relevant to "social networking news".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:18:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The music industry is simply too lazy or too unoriginal to solve the problem itself. So it's trying to rely on taxing individuals who have nothing to do with music piracy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Plus, it sounds nice that the fees collected will be "given back to the artists." But, come on, who really believes that will happen. It'll get sucked up in the industry/record label bureaucracy and the artists still won't see it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:15:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah... they though about this in France for some time... Guess It'll come back. We already have a similar tax/prepremtive fine on blank CD and DVD, HD and USB keys...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fabrice Epelboin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Laughing and Crying is sooo easy! (oh and whats wrong with the premptive music tax? If they say piracy is wrong and most of the users on an ISP are downloading a blanket tax is fair)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Prometheus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:42:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Tax: Because Cocaine Doesn&amp;#8217;t Buy Itself</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/24/music-tax-cocaine/#comment-6012745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Take a look at Germany there they collect a fee for all devices able to connect to the internet (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geb" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geb"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;Ã¼hreneinzugszentrale)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>