<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in DotMac: Why Is Apple Still Neglecting The Web?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_18990/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:00:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: DotMac: Why Is Apple Still Neglecting The Web?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/02/02/dotmac-why-is-apple-still-neglecting-the-web/#comment-5993661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I do agree that dotmac is pricey, it is great for the user who wants a simple and easy way to sync, store and maintain from simple, elegant websites. I agree with Max R, as it is an easy sell to the novice computer user. &lt;br&gt;I do want to note though that I have been a dotmac user since its inception and it was originally FREE!  It was first called iTools and was heavily targeted to educators.  It has come a long way since these days, even though it is still not the innovative service that it could be.  &lt;br&gt;Who wouldn't love lower prices, more storage and more integration with web 2.0 and music. I am holding out hope that dotmac will transform soon!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LD</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:00:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DotMac: Why Is Apple Still Neglecting The Web?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/02/02/dotmac-why-is-apple-still-neglecting-the-web/#comment-5993660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree if they cut the price they would get more people signing up for it. Man I would sign up for it if they cut the price.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bryant</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:49:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DotMac: Why Is Apple Still Neglecting The Web?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/02/02/dotmac-why-is-apple-still-neglecting-the-web/#comment-5993659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem I have with Dot Mac is the fact that it has one price and features fit all. Not everyone has two or more Mac's Although I am Steve Jobs wished you did. So maybe Sync and backup may not be in your cards. Maybe you don't even care to have a web page. Maybe you just want Mail. Why would you pay $100 for a Mail service?? It's really no better then any other unless you car to Sync to Mac's.&lt;br&gt;Why does Apple not upgrade or improve dot Mac. Simple, theirs enough Mac Fans paying $100 so they don't need too! Let's face it though. If you have already paid more for a computer buying a Apple, and have forked out hundreds for a iphone or some other Apple product. Then $100 for email is no big deal. Im sure for the general consumer, this makes Apple look like a real ripoff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:24:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DotMac: Why Is Apple Still Neglecting The Web?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/02/02/dotmac-why-is-apple-still-neglecting-the-web/#comment-5993658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dotmac will never be free.  Apple is smart enough to realise that the future is in cloud software, files and services.  Dotmac ensures they will have a great path and revenue stream  to deliver their software, when the critical mass of people switch from the desktop to the cloud approach to computing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dsacgt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:52:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DotMac: Why Is Apple Still Neglecting The Web?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/02/02/dotmac-why-is-apple-still-neglecting-the-web/#comment-5993657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Think of the amazingly vibrant community platform they could have integrated into .mac by now. Imagine if each mac owner had an option of creating a user profile to share with all other owners. Of course not everyone would be interested, but mac owners are drawn together as tightly as almost any other brand.  But they did nothing other than offer email services you have to pay for. They certainly let a giant opportunity slip away over some cockamamie revenue plan.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Rheingold</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:53:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DotMac: Why Is Apple Still Neglecting The Web?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/02/02/dotmac-why-is-apple-still-neglecting-the-web/#comment-5993656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They can start by making iWeb part of .Mac, not iLife. Then finish by dramatically lowering the price. I use it to synchronize my calendars and for a stable email address. Everything else I get for free from my ISP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What ever happened to Jobs' promise of great things to come for .Mac (at the same time he called AppleTV a "hobby")?!?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jsk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:38:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>