<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Current.tv &amp;#8211; A Ten Step Lesson in Screwing Up Peer Production</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_1883/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:16:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Current.tv &amp;#8211; A Ten Step Lesson in Screwing Up Peer Production</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/02/04/currenttv-a-ten-step-lesson-in-screwing-up-peer-production/#comment-5890484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your post was pretty interesting. You should track ChannelMedia. They're building a national affiliate system that's turning the traditional television network model on its head. Let me know if you're interested to hear more. -joe&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:16:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Current.tv &amp;#8211; A Ten Step Lesson in Screwing Up Peer Production</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/02/04/currenttv-a-ten-step-lesson-in-screwing-up-peer-production/#comment-5890482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Iâ€™m not impressed by &lt;a href="http://Current.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Current.tv"&gt;Current.tv&lt;/a&gt; too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:35:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Current.tv &amp;#8211; A Ten Step Lesson in Screwing Up Peer Production</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/02/04/currenttv-a-ten-step-lesson-in-screwing-up-peer-production/#comment-5890480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It makes me think that we need to sit down and articulate the Demand Fulfillment Patterns for peer production - just like JIT / ext. fulfillment / BPO etc. were discovered for contract-based productivity .... the point is that just as in any other business strategy, there's probably more than 1 good way of producing "on the edge" - and soon, just being on the edge won't be good enough - and you'll need to find the BEST edge pattern to solve each W2.0 problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David G</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Current.tv &amp;#8211; A Ten Step Lesson in Screwing Up Peer Production</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/02/04/currenttv-a-ten-step-lesson-in-screwing-up-peer-production/#comment-5890479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you're on to something there.  "Peer production on demand" is definitely an interesting angle, and it's something that hasn't been fully explored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Services like Yahoo Answers / Google Answers point towards how peer production on demand might work.  But I think Mechanical Turk is the most efficient on-demand system to date - there are literally thousands of people on MTurk who will devote their time to a task in exchange for payment.  Users also build up qualifications that prove how good they are at various tasks.  Compared to the relative inefficiency of calling up a specialist, this is astoundingly good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, MTurk won't work for everything.  We need verticals for all kinds of tasks - be it information gathering, task fulfillment or content creation.  We've had services like &lt;a href="http://rentacoder.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="rentacoder.com"&gt;rentacoder.com&lt;/a&gt; (for programming) for a while, suggesting that peer production on demand is by no means a recent phenomenon.  Ultimately, these services become marketplaces for task-completion - and in most cases I expect there will be a monetary transaction involved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS.  Does anyone else think the comments form should be bigger in this new template?  Seems kinda hard to write long comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Current.tv &amp;#8211; A Ten Step Lesson in Screwing Up Peer Production</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/02/04/currenttv-a-ten-step-lesson-in-screwing-up-peer-production/#comment-5890478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's probable that their content / model / pitch etc. sucks, I honestly haven't watched it ... but, I wouldn't write this production model off just yet;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;... think "peer production on demand"; it's possible that there's stuff that should / could be peer produced that doesn't yet exist ... check out how istockphoto now provide a platform for designers to request a) images and b) searches "on demand" for imagery that they can't find - "google answers vs. wikipedia" etc. etc. etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;... it's still peer production, but the "abundant resources" being tapped are member's future time, not their past products or assets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What do you think, Pete?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David G</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 13:06:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>