<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in 2008/05/18/backstage/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_1861/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:34:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 2008/05/18/backstage/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/18/backstage/#comment-6003658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is one of those things that bands and artists will try and learn what "not" to do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry Grant, but its nothing a band can't already do with a blogspot blog, google analytics and feedburner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dan-O's Free MP3 Blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.danosongs.com/music_blog" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.danosongs.com/music_blog"&gt;http://www.danosongs.com/mu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DanoSongsBlog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/18/backstage/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/18/backstage/#comment-6003657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;long ago, record companies were worried that if people heard the music over the radio FOR FREE, they wouldn't buy the record.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Napster was the best thing that happened to me! People found me through free listenings from music posted by other people who already were fans. nice. I didn't have to do any work to get those new listeners/fans, thanks to the fans I already had. I could focus on the touring, the writing, the recording.&lt;br&gt;sweet. After a bit more research, I may try this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carolineaiken</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:19:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/18/backstage/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/18/backstage/#comment-6003656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@jamesc7 - the difference between your idea and Backstage is that with Backstage, artists can actually track how many people have downloaded their music and know who they are - it's up to the band to decide if they think that is valuable information or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@LaSean - the giveaways are self-promoted by the bands, not Backstage - their fans act as the quality filter - good music will get shared.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Grant</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:37:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/18/backstage/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/18/backstage/#comment-6003655</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This works for NIN because they have existing demand for their product.  Listeners will quickly tune out without someone filtering for quality.  The duds will sit right next to the stars.  Anyone remember Napster fatigue when the novelty of "free" wore off?  These tracks aren't free -- the price is your time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LaSean</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:15:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/18/backstage/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/18/backstage/#comment-6003654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.absolutepunk.net/showthread.php?t=319556" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.absolutepunk.net/showthread.php?t=319556"&gt;http://www.absolutepunk.net...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;wow, some band just did almost excatly what i just said lol. Point proven!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamesc7</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 01:20:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/18/backstage/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/18/backstage/#comment-6003653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Arrington would be proud. Another company that thinks content owners/ creators shouldn't being compensated for acquiring customers for their website. I'm getting in early on the deadpool for this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 23:29:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/18/backstage/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/18/backstage/#comment-6003652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why wouldnt a band just put there tunes up on like a rapidshare and send out a link to all there myspace/facebook friends and then email some music news sites for some press. I don't get making the band pay. If anything the site should pay the bands for the traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamesc7</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 20:45:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>