<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_18460/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:18:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posting about this. I used it on my show and linked back, although I heard that not all the viewers actually think this is any good. And they were students of all things. Curious how it will fly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;anyway, here is the episode link:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://dailybuzz.mobuzz.tv/shows/surf_dance_and_scientific_searches" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dailybuzz.mobuzz.tv/shows/surf_dance_and_scientific_searches"&gt;http://dailybuzz.mobuzz.tv/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks and cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeMac</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I cannot see the point as the same thing could easily be done with Google Custom Search.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Infonote</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i ts kinda gd well 4 studing all dah........................&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nabeela</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:09:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt, nice to see you in these parts. It does seem that &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aedu+OR+site%3Aorg+QUERY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aedu+OR+site%3Aorg+QUERY"&gt;http://www.google.com/searc...&lt;/a&gt; is the best comparable for &lt;a href="http://www.refseek.com/search/search.php?q=QUERY" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.refseek.com/search/search.php?q=QUERY"&gt;http://www.refseek.com/sear...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Either way, I think that anyone who wants to turn the collective knowledge base into a global library would do well to read the library science research (e.g., folks like Tefko Saracevic, Nick Belkin, Marti Hearst, and Gary Marchionini) and support exploratory search.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:02:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If this site is so smart, how come it has not filtered the spam from its own comments?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another tool to add to the arsenal of search engines.. good to see a new kid on the block that is NOT Cuil. I laughed when you said it was simpler than Google.. went to check out the site right away.. and hey, you're right. That alone should get them funding: "We've got an even more simple layout than Google!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:43:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;MY LITMUS TEST&lt;br&gt;  Result RefSeek : FAIL&lt;br&gt; I tried to something that may may be considered non scholastic  'SMS India' while Google Scholar returned results relating to SMS usertrends studies in India. RefSeek returned sites offering Love, Friendship sms' etc .. just because they had .org domain. Silly&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Supreet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fantastic site.  I though I would use this to see if it found my papers.  It did, but it also found a paper by another author who has copied my work, and published it as their own.  In this respect refseek is a fantastic tool, just to help to cut down on plagarism.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Young</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:59:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on a few queries, I find the quality of RefSeek to be comparable to that of Google Scholar. It's hard to make a quantitative comparison without benchmarks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But what neither of these interfaces support is exploration to learn more about a topic. They're fine for known-item search--highly specific queries where you know exact what you're looking for and it shows up in the top few hits. But for broader topical queries that return thousands of results, the best I can say is that at  least RefSeek at least might point you to Wikipedia. Neither gives you an overview or organization of the results that might guide you to learn more about them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:33:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RefSeek is Google for Students and Scientists</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search/#comment-6026334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a graduate student, I am interested to try out Refseek to search for relevant academic papers and links of interest. I absolutely love using &lt;a href="http://google.scholar.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="google.scholar.com"&gt;google.scholar.com&lt;/a&gt; because I am able to find papers and journal articles of interests.   For me to use Refseek, it would at a minimum have to have similar value to what I get from Google Scholar.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tyfn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:05:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>