<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_1816/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:59:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes i didn't like the little Google Favicon, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We also released a Favicon-Contest (you can win 75 USD):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.michaelkonjevic.com/contest.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.michaelkonjevic.com/contest.html"&gt;http://www.michaelkonjevic....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:59:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed.  The new lowercase G isn't.... good.  If it's not broken.... don't fix it.  And for the love of all that's holy, stay away from the rainbow things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris S</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:07:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate the new icon.. I want the old one back, I keep overlooking my Google tabs in FF because I don't see my big 'G' *sigh*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keeem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:42:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google in full may look a bit odd as the standard favicon, All scrunched up in just a couple dozen or so pixels.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulGlazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:41:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;new favicon is the biggest pile of shit I've seen from google yet...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i've almost dropped google search because of that crap looking favicon, its not easily noticable when you've got a ton of TABs opened up anymore..  friggon morrons, they'd be wise to change it back to something more simimlar to there old favicon.. instead they'll probably won't be because they are MORRONS, so I'll give live search some use now :p&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Azlo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:43:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't like the lowercase g at all. In fact, when I first saw it I figured it was part of a Greasemonkey script for Gmail. I looked for the option to go back to the default favicon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a designer, I know most often the simpler a solution to a visual problem, the better. And it's obvious Google went through many iterations. But this looks uninspired. An afterthought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:42:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think maybe they should opt for the one where it says Google in full. Just G could also stand for God, which is what the all knowing all seeing Google is accused of being.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:09:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;+1&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nafnosseb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't like this lowercase blue g. The colorful uppercase g is great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nafnosseb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:39:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreeing with Brian.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally, I like the 'Go' icon; white background, familiar blue G, familiar red o, and a clever double-entendre.  If not that, then just clean white with familiar blue G.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick M</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 00:24:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been staring at the new favicon for some time now, wondering whether or not I'm on a phished site. Honestly, this favicon has nothing in common with Google. Remove it, asap.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lance</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:13:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google is not a small g.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not a small change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a brand statement- without a clear rationale = mistake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Carter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mathew,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's possible. But was the original favicon particularly threatening? I think the company needs to signify consumer-friendly while offering a logo that represents something big, a big, global idea. The "little g" just doesn't seem to offer that impression. Of course, it's not really all that necessary to loiter extensively around a the subject of what should make a favicon. If they choose "little g", they so be it. But, you know, keeping the icon as much alike to how it was for the past 8.5 years would just seem...logical to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulGlazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:30:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I personally don't like any of the above options the old one was the best. And I'd rather have that for all of the services. The old favicon did portray strength. When I saw this new one, the first thing that just popped into my head was stepping down.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deepa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006268</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if Google wanted to move away from the capital G to a lower-case one simply because lower-case looks "friendlier" than capitalized.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mathew Ingram</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree.&lt;br&gt;Register &lt;a href="Http://www.bidmogul.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Http://www.bidmogul.com"&gt;Http://www.bidmogul.com&lt;/a&gt; before 7/1/08 and get 3 psots FREE!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BidMogul.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree. When I first saw the new favi in my tab bar I had to double check that I was actually on Google's homepage. The color is wrong, and putting it in lowercase is total sacrilege. It would be like if Yahoo! removed the exclamation point from their logo, and changed the font to comic sans.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Count Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006265</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that the new icon could be the reason for the first trial about an icon :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check this : &lt;a href="http://www.webjam.com/kylie/$my_blog/2008/06/04/google_and_guardian_icons" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.webjam.com/kylie/$my_blog/2008/06/04/google_and_guardian_icons"&gt;http://www.webjam.com/kylie...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cedric</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:37:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that there should be sepearte favicons for each service.  If you look at a majority of their services now this is the case: Gmail, Reader,Blogger, Calendar etc.  If they continued with this standardization then they wouldn't have to worry about if one was good enough for the group.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Douglas, Captain John,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, which favicon(s) do you favor?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulGlazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:06:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006262</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The important thing for Google is not just ot's outside appearance to the outside world.But also it's internal structure.With success and money come the "managers".The guys in grey suits who soon create "layers of stifling managment".A pyramid structure to help assist  fleecing off the cash. Once they get inside a company,the writing of stagnation is on the wall.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:06:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think each service should have a different color of the same favicon... so you can tell them apart quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Captain John</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 11:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google VP Calls For Comments On Favicon Design</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/07/google-favicon/#comment-6006260</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two of Google's strengths are its agility and its simplicity.  Some of these icons look colorful, complex and difficult - not very reminiscent of the company.  Unless, of course, they're trying to change their image.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Douglas Karr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 11:45:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>