Cloudware - apps and services that once would have run on a desktop operating system now run in the cloud: unbounded, evershifting, intangible collection of servers that make up the internet.
Jeffro2pt0
· 2 years ago
I think whats even funnier than these buzzwords are the job titles associated with so-called Web 2.0 positions.
Chief Evangelist: Head of a company’s sales and marketing team
Virtual World Bureau Chief: Head of a news bureau in Second Life
Brand Champion: A PR person for a particular company’s brand
Senior Interface Hacker: Writer of code to build applications and create user interfaces for podcasts
Web Product Demigod: Creator of open-source content management systems
Online Audience Development Manager: Head of effort to get a company’s site to the top of a Google or Yahoo! search results
* VP of Emerging Media * Chief Risk Officer * New Media Specialist * Chief Diversity Officer * Chief Interrupter Officer * Instigator * Content Analyst
Varun
· 2 years ago
How about these
IntelliSourcing Web2.5 Network Bridging Commutiny Communication Commerce(In short COMM3)
I don't know exaclty what does each of these terms mean. But if anyone of these become buzz-words, or if you people decide to give these words a shot in your business plans, do give me a mention/royality there Thanks
Rasmus Lasthein
· 2 years ago
This on is really good. I was thinking along those lines myself "CrowdGrid" but yours is better :-)
Amit
· 2 years ago
Try this:
DisruptWare
A lot of VCs are looking for "disruptive technology" - something that when embraced by tha masses will significantly change the way most people do *something*
Like, cellular communications started out as disruptive technology;
In fact, the Internet itself stated out as disrutive technology (if people still remember Archie, Gopher and then Mosaic).
And, consequently, here is the role that will become most sought for in DisruptWare startups:
Chief Disruption Officer...
Avi
· 2 years ago
So I don't get it, if they aren't investing in Web2.0, are they just not investing in dot com startups anymore? I mean forget about what is Web2.0 , at this time online, what isn't web2.0?
Harry
· 2 years ago
I know, why don't we call them "websites", or is that pushing the envelope just a bit too much?
Or let's just call them whatever the guy with the money wants them to be called which is kind of what it's all about (feeling a touch cynical today).
Andrew
· 2 years ago
OK, "a new set of industry buzzwords."
How about "mashable" or "read/write web"? Wait, those are the names of blogs, which are so web 2.0...
Chao Lam
· 2 years ago
We're a Flying Spaghetti Monster type of startup.
Taly Weiss
· 2 years ago
I tend to believe in conspiracies…might it be that someone up there wants this open web conversation to end????
Murray
· 2 years ago
How about web 3.0?
In May 2007, Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google said "If I were to guess what Web 3.0 is, I would tell you that it's a different way of building applications... My prediction would be that Web 3.0 will ultimately been seen as applications which are pieced together. There are a number of characteristics: the applications are relatively small, the data is in the cloud, the applications can run on any device, PC or mobile phone, the applications are very fast and they're very customizable. Futhermore, the applications are distributed virally: literally by social networks, by email. You won't go to the store and purchase them... That's a very different application model than we've ever seen in computing."
Were still working out some of the complexities of displaying web pages over the internet correctly.
So far, as a result of the efforts of our software developers we have managed to create a massive online social network of people united in a single cause.
We're not sure what their cause is as none of the computers in our office will display the forums properly.
Anyway I'm sure it's a worthy thing.
Anyway, must go. I've got a new product we're developing to go and test called the M-Phone, it's really quite brilliant and runs on our new mobile operating system; W-MX 10.5.
How do we think of these things!!!
Anyway, ta ta.
Nathaniel B
· 1 year ago
Web 2.0 Basic Web 2.0 Premium Web 2.0 Ultimate
Dan
· 1 year ago
Honestly, I think people don't seem to want to look at how people actually are actually going to USE web 2.0 stuff.
Most people are not going to understand using the web for their applications, rather then just using the stuff that's on their computer. The medium is just a wrong environment for some apps. Why do I need Writely when I have Word sitting on my desktop? Do I actually care that I have access to my docs from everywhere, when my normal routine of work is to sit down at my computer? What does doing my work in the web cloud offer me, that a web-enabled Word app can't provide?
It seems like we suddenly decided that the web rules for EVERYTHING and thus every single pathetic little application has to now be web-based, regardless of function. Does the web cloud offer content and resources a "non-internet-enabled" app doesn't have? Of course. But it makes less sense to me to have to log into a website to perform a basic function then to find an app in 2 clicks on my computer via the Start Menu.
So in short, Web 2.0 authors really need to think about why doing a certain function on the web is better then doing it offline in a regular program. Because without that differentiation, Web 2.0 will die.
All Comments
Cloudware - apps and services that once would have run on a desktop operating system now run in the cloud: unbounded, evershifting, intangible collection of servers that make up the internet.
Chief Evangelist:
Head of a company’s sales and marketing team
Virtual World Bureau Chief:
Head of a news bureau in Second Life
Brand Champion:
A PR person for a particular company’s brand
Senior Interface Hacker:
Writer of code to build applications and create user interfaces for podcasts
Web Product Demigod:
Creator of open-source content management systems
Online Audience Development Manager:
Head of effort to get a company’s site to the top of a Google or Yahoo! search results
* VP of Emerging Media
* Chief Risk Officer
* New Media Specialist
* Chief Diversity Officer
* Chief Interrupter Officer
* Instigator
* Content Analyst
IntelliSourcing
Web2.5
Network Bridging
Commutiny Communication Commerce(In short COMM3)
I don't know exaclty what does each of these terms mean. But if anyone of these become buzz-words, or if you people decide to give these words a shot in your business plans, do give me a mention/royality there
Thanks
DisruptWare
A lot of VCs are looking for "disruptive technology" - something that when embraced by tha masses will significantly change the way most people do *something*
Like, cellular communications started out as disruptive technology;
In fact, the Internet itself stated out as disrutive technology (if people still remember Archie, Gopher and then Mosaic).
And, consequently, here is the role that will become most sought for in DisruptWare startups:
Chief Disruption Officer...
Or let's just call them whatever the guy with the money wants them to be called which is kind of what it's all about (feeling a touch cynical today).
How about "mashable" or "read/write web"? Wait, those are the names of blogs, which are so web 2.0...
In May 2007, Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google said "If I were to guess what Web 3.0 is, I would tell you that it's a different way of building applications... My prediction would be that Web 3.0 will ultimately been seen as applications which are pieced together. There are a number of characteristics: the applications are relatively small, the data is in the cloud, the applications can run on any device, PC or mobile phone, the applications are very fast and they're very customizable. Futhermore, the applications are distributed virally: literally by social networks, by email. You won't go to the store and purchase them... That's a very different application model than we've ever seen in computing."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_3.0
CrowdSourcing:
Futurism:
HyperLocal:
Peer Production:
Utility Computing:
Were still working out some of the complexities of displaying web pages over the internet correctly.
So far, as a result of the efforts of our software developers we have managed to create a massive online social network of people united in a single cause.
We're not sure what their cause is as none of the computers in our office will display the forums properly.
Anyway I'm sure it's a worthy thing.
Anyway, must go. I've got a new product we're developing to go and test called the M-Phone, it's really quite brilliant and runs on our new mobile operating system; W-MX 10.5.
How do we think of these things!!!
Anyway, ta ta.
Web 2.0 Premium
Web 2.0 Ultimate
Most people are not going to understand using the web for their applications, rather then just using the stuff that's on their computer. The medium is just a wrong environment for some apps. Why do I need Writely when I have Word sitting on my desktop? Do I actually care that I have access to my docs from everywhere, when my normal routine of work is to sit down at my computer? What does doing my work in the web cloud offer me, that a web-enabled Word app can't provide?
It seems like we suddenly decided that the web rules for EVERYTHING and thus every single pathetic little application has to now be web-based, regardless of function. Does the web cloud offer content and resources a "non-internet-enabled" app doesn't have? Of course. But it makes less sense to me to have to log into a website to perform a basic function then to find an app in 2 clicks on my computer via the Start Menu.
So in short, Web 2.0 authors really need to think about why doing a certain function on the web is better then doing it offline in a regular program. Because without that differentiation, Web 2.0 will die.