-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2007/01/18/myspace-disables-flash/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
5 hours ago · 96 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
1 hour ago · 10 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
6 hours ago · 29 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
5 hours ago · 23 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
4 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Uh...a change that could affect the majority of our readers isn't newsworthy?
Did you remove it?
jd/adobe
I don't understand why MySpace has disabled Flash a couple times. Flash widgets contribute to the growth of MySpace, since these widgets give users many ways to spice up their page.
Thanks for the post! Many people were unaware.
MySpace required embed tags to embed Flash content. The preferred method was to embed via the object tag, but that was completely stripped out by MySpace.
This morning:
MySpace began rolling out a change that would block embed tags, but allow object tags for embedded content. This caused some users to report stickers as "not working."
This morning + n hours:
MySpace finished the change that converted a user's embed tags to properly formatted object tags and therefore allowed.
Soon, all embedded objects on MySpace will be using object instead of embed. The previous restrictions such as "allownetworking = internal", "allowScriptAccess = never", "enableJSURL = false", and "enableHREF = false" all remain. One new FlashVar I do not recognize is "saveEmbedTags = true" which is probably an internal flag to MySpace.
This is probably part of a larger, more-intelligent Flash filtering solution that would lend itself to a situation where MySpace acts as a gatekeeper to Flash stickers (as discussed).
By that logic, Google could also block any site it doesn't like from its index for no good reason (ie. Yahoo), and anyone who gets traffic from search is an idiot for relying on search traffic. That would mean...almost every site on the web (Google actually pushed the limits here by trying to promote their own products as a "tip", before they were pressured to cease that practice). Or Microsoft could kill off any Windows application in favor of its own products (they've already been convicted of monopolistic behavior). In fact, I don't own my phone line - it's my telco's line, so maybe they should decide what goes through it (ie. the net neutrality debate). At some point, these services become platforms, and at least some communication with developers would be appreciated.
But yeah, all widget developers are playing a high risk game. But as you know, the rewards are also high, and that's the nature of business. The riskiest social startup of last year - YouTube - scored one of the highest acquisition prices. Wouldn't you rather go all or nothing than end up with something mediocre?
I can't wait till VIRB.com comes out it will take over the whole social network scene. Goobye Myspace.....goodbye...so long to corporate social networks.....
Wishful thinking. ;)
Peace!
-Saïd
curiouser and curiouser!
They would not need to do all these changes if people would just use myspace the way it was intended. All these changes are to help protect your account and your experience on myspace.
There are cases where you have browser/plugin intercommunication where the domains can become confused, as in the Acrobat Reader scare of earlier this month (js requests passed by older Readers could sometimes not have the domains properly understood by some browsers), but the browser handles the OBJECT/EMBED, rather than the Player.
I'm not sure of the hypothesis that "OBJECT tag is more secure"... the only evidence I've seen so far is that this tag passed the W3C Validators, and I've seen discrepancies in many browsers when they do not receive the EMBED. I haven't seen situations where browsers get confused about the domain depending on whether OBJECT or EMBED is used.
Summary: I'm not sure yet of MySpace's thinking. I wish they had some type of reliable public communication, though.
jd/adobe
i've been playing around a little more, and it seems that the new filtering blocks QUICKTIME completely!
i can now see why they don't use "embed" at ALL: the object tag can force the mimetype of the embedded content, whereas the embed tag cannot (i believe). in the past, myspace has tried to block certain kinds of embedded content via filename extension, but that can be easily circumvented on the server side (e.g. serving up a quicktime movie that is named 'movie.swf'). now ALL embeds are forced to be flash, so even if you try to serve up a quicktime movie (or some other kind of media), it'll be loaded by the flash plugin. no more quicktime worms... and no more quicktime of any sort on myspace.
you can see what i'm writing about if you go to http://www.myspace.com/djheadhoncho
in the IE7 browser it recognizes the object tag and i can position the flash players whereever i want. but if you look at the same site in Firefox i can't absolute position it correctly.
if anyone knows of a work around this.
please email me at infectthesystem@gmail.com
Hmm...YouTube embeds work for me. What are you trying to embed?
Strange Strange Strange... I can't understand...
as of 08-04-09 flash has disabled any outgoing comunication with the flash player.
I spent all nite making a widget for a client then again all day trying to debug the application to find out it was myspace screwing me. I cant bill for that time. Im pissed.
the internet has always a fre place and they ill not change that. they are digging their own grave.
google = open = atractive to people = money.
myspace is the opposite end to open and freedom.