<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in &amp;#8220;Web 2.0&amp;#8243; is Most Popular Wikipedia Entry of 2006</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_1452/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:13:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Web 2.0&amp;#8243; is Most Popular Wikipedia Entry of 2006</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/01/03/web-20-is-most-popular-wikipedia-entry-of-2006/#comment-5918799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have an outstanding good and well structured site. I enjoyed browsing through it.5&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paloma</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Web 2.0&amp;#8243; is Most Popular Wikipedia Entry of 2006</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/01/03/web-20-is-most-popular-wikipedia-entry-of-2006/#comment-5918798</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just cited the web 2.0 entry in my recent power point presentation and like you I've also again linked to the entry on my blog post on it being the most cited, thus feeding it's popularity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FusionPRForum</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:41:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Web 2.0&amp;#8243; is Most Popular Wikipedia Entry of 2006</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/01/03/web-20-is-most-popular-wikipedia-entry-of-2006/#comment-5918797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was also the number 2 most searched for definition on &lt;a href="http://Google.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Google.com"&gt;Google.com&lt;/a&gt; - if you're minded to take the 2006 Zeitgeist at face value.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Antony Mayfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Web 2.0&amp;#8243; is Most Popular Wikipedia Entry of 2006</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/01/03/web-20-is-most-popular-wikipedia-entry-of-2006/#comment-5918796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sanford,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Easy.  I'd point to &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzzword" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzzword"&gt;this entry&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Web 2.0&amp;#8243; is Most Popular Wikipedia Entry of 2006</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/01/03/web-20-is-most-popular-wikipedia-entry-of-2006/#comment-5918794</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's because nobody can define it for themselves.  It's vague like that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:05:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>