<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Plaxo Opens Up Social Networking Aggregation Code</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_12107/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 04:41:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Plaxo Opens Up Social Networking Aggregation Code</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/28/plaxo-open-source-code/#comment-5975023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Plaxo synchronization service is rubbish.  They charge for it and it is hopelessly bug-ridden.  It actually destroyed several of my contact records and badly damaged the others to the point where I had to reinstall my entire database.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They are also well-known for generating duplicates and then being unable to solve the issues this creates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have lost any trust in them and would stay well away from them if I were you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Astorg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 04:41:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plaxo Opens Up Social Networking Aggregation Code</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/28/plaxo-open-source-code/#comment-5975022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By the way, Hypercube is a GREAT idea and I'm surprised no one has gotten to it earlier. As Mac OSX users, we love our widgets, but Microsucks has not provided a similar platform. Enter Hypercube.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(by the way, Hypercube is way bug-ridden... it should be since it's an alpha... but just be forewarned)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:02:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plaxo Opens Up Social Networking Aggregation Code</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/08/28/plaxo-open-source-code/#comment-5975021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a noble effort Plaxo is undertaking but I wonder how big a problem this really solves? I use 2 social networks on a regular basis and personally I don't see value in trying to merge them. In fact, I'd rather keep them separate. Each site serves a different purpose. Facebook = jeans and LinkedIn = business casual. All I'm saying is lets not overestimate the general online population's need to aggregate all this stuff.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;my further 2c on the walled garden issue: &lt;a href="http://mediatrending.com/2007/08/18/social-networks-as-walled-gardens-whats-the-issue/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mediatrending.com/2007/08/18/social-networks-as-walled-gardens-whats-the-issue/"&gt;http://mediatrending.com/20...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a sidenote, Plaxo has long been trying to solve a problem that just isn't that big an issue: address book synchronization. When I was a Prod Mgr for Yahoo Address Book, this was clear from traffic numbers and user research. There were a few people that were VERY interested in it (and very vocal about it), but for most users it just wasn't worth the hassle of installing and configuring yet another app.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:59:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>