-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2007/12/04/the-mpaa-shows-pirates-how-its-done/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
9 hours ago · 104 comments
-
Holiday Mojo: What Kind of Seasonal Twitter User Are You?
2 hours ago · 13 comments
-
REVEALED: Details on YouTube’s VEVO Music Video Site
2 hours ago · 8 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
5 hours ago · 20 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
9 hours ago · 31 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Oh, Mashable! We're all guilty of typos :)
Seriously, I think MPA is the Motion Picture Association, the worldwide entity, of which the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) is a part.
I'm with you on the Web design. Wow, that's the best they can do? Gee, don't overwhelm me or anything.
Maybe you should only write stories about which you are vaguely informed.
So when the MPAA sets out to defend it's Intellectual Property - it's mean, only for money, behind the times, stupid, petty, and wrong. But when Mashable is the one getting content stolen - well, hey, that's dishonest! It's wrong. No one should be making money off of your content but you, right? That's only fair. That's what's right. Pirates are bad... OOPS! I mean Plagiarists are bad. How's that for a typo?
What? You're not laughing yet? Don't you see how funny this is?
Here's why I *suspected* that MPA wasn't a typo on that site - because I am familiar with the issue and know that the MPA is the international body. Here' how I *knew* it wasn't a typo - because I checked the WHOIS.
Seriously, please stop being so defensive about the comments people are leaving. Be a little more careful in your writing and research (yes, research, try it) and people will be able focus on the content instead.
Mashable being annoyed that their intellectual property is being stolen and masqueraded as someone else's is completely different from bootlegging a movie or TV show. When someone does that, they're not turning around and saying "Hey, dude, check out this movie I made, it's called the Sixth Sense and it RAWKS!"
It's one thing to protect your IP when you need every penny you can get AND when someone else is taking credit for your work. It's something else when you're just greedy as hell and can't handle the thought of a handful of people getting your product for free (as if you'd think twice about going with the cheapest source for something you wanted).
Capitalism breeds the urge for the cheapest. Don't blame bootleggers for being smart businessmen. Not that I'd know anything about any of this stuff.