-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/03/30/masters-degree-social-media/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
5 hours ago · 95 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
1 hour ago · 9 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
4 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
5 hours ago · 23 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
6 hours ago · 29 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Also that price for a single year is crazy, and seems a bandwagon idea? Most 3 year honours courses come in at less than that.
Maybe a better way would make it optional modules on Marketing and PR type courses?
twitter.com/stuartflatt
Price for a single year is normal for a Masters course in the UK - this is not an undergraduate 3 year honours course.
And as for optional modules - the whole point is we're not crow-bar-ing this into a traditional 'marketing' course that teaches people to do the exact opposite of most social media norms (e.g. most marketing courses would have you filter and control); this is a wider issue.
Surely if the modules are optional, that is not 'crow-barring'? People would sign up if them deemed them appropriate.
I think your being a bit defensive here, I know there has been alot of media backlash, but I was merely trying to convey my thoughts.
Oh and just because someone is not on 'facebook' does not mean they are not real! Equally just because a profile is on facebook does not make that person true to real life.
Is there information available on the course? Maybe you could post a link to allow people to make up their own minds rather than a listen to a 'virtual' person...
@Louis - Good point on validity and how up-to-date the curriculum is.
Anyway for a social networking course, it sure has created a buzz in 'social networking circles' so job done :)
As for the dubious quote, I know how some journalists work, and it also seems odd to me that a student who says 'everyone knows how to do this stuff' is not doing it himself. Especially with very few students not on Facebook.
Course link (would be good in the article itself too) is http://bit.ly/masocialmedia - you'll notice it's also aggregating anything tagged #masocialmedia
As a grounding the course is probably fine but to attach a Masters title to it seems a bit of a reach to me.
Also while best practise is constantly being defined how on earth do you plan a curriculum? It could be that by the end of the year students are being graded on outdated practise?
What could be done is use it more as a theory class. The basic concept of social networking sites being used to have online conversations hasn't changed since pre-web internet days. The more difficult part is leveraging it to a commercial advantage. Social networking sites are fundamentally just communication tools, like a telephone. Joining the conversation as opposed to forced interruption marketing is a concept that does need to be learned.
Signed,
University of Birmingham alumni....not that I'm elitist or anything!
It is strange that what every kid can learn from a week of social activity over the internet requires a year for a grown up to learn.
Times are changing.
First the idea that the class has to have a top-down control structure is entirely at odds with how social media works. It's a conversation, not a lecture or a speech. It's to the university's credit that they're approaching the class much in the same fashion. Yes, the professor should direct the conversation toward covering the elements of the program, the various platforms, utilities, the intersection of social media and the law and alternate media, but more in the role of facilitator than as know-all expert.
Of course, I believe that's true for a lot of classes. Regurgitation of the teacher's bullet points isn't learning; get the students thinking about this stuff in class, aloud and in their independent work, and you've done more to teach them about how to think about the material than simply to adhere to specific technologies and viewpoints that quickly become outdated.
Secondly, I recall that even though we studied Shakespeare in my literature classes, there were new books being written and published every day. OMG! How could we learn this outdated stuff? Weren't those professors wasting our time?
I don't think the idea of this degree program is to teach you how to use Twitter 2009 and the first version of TweetDeck. It's to teach you how to determine who is worth following on Twitter, how to separate the personal from the professional in its use (and how to mix the personal into your professional so that you don't present yourself as a marketing-speak spewer), how to beta test various additional apps in your use of these platforms to find the best mix for you, how to teach other people the use of these media, and so on and so forth.
For all you naysayers and skeptics, this sounds remarkably like kind of complaining when universities started offering courses in television or advertising. Even in this brave new social media world, apparently the new is always ripe for attacks.
are you guys insane ?
http://smu.edu/meadows/advertising/graduate/wor...
There are many colleges which offer the same under Masters in Digital Marketing. So nothing really new here. Cheers
We take that seriously in our own digital media master's degree program at the University of Washington in Seattle (http://mcdm.washington.edu). We take a strongly collaborative approach to learning, both in-class and through online collaborative platforms. In my own "Social Production and Digital Distribution" class, we emphasize the need to understand the motivation and trends behind social production (Cluetrain Manifesto, The Wealth of Networks, Democratizing Innovation). We then apply the conceptual to the creation of hands-on strategies for various community organizations.
Twitter, Facebook, etc. may come and go. But what remains is the very real change in communication with the ongoing creation of online communities (which, as Clay Shirky says, share, cooperate and take collection action all beyond traditional institutional intermediaries). That won't go away unless the Internet self-destructs.
If anyone asked me now about doing a course in social media in order to get a job in this field, I'd point them to the IDM or one of the many bodies offering 'social media for business' training, tell them to follow people like Chris Brogan on Twitter or attend the Social Media Influence conferences in London. My feeling is that university is exclusively for academic study and an MA should be about engaging with and extending research & understanding in the areas that social media touches such as social psychology, cultural studies, linguistics, philosophy and even history.
http://twitter.com/spryka
Hall Monitor
http://detentionslip.org
At this point consider me a Ludite. Look it up! Its a Brit term.
C'mon I live in PHX, AZ. You can get a degree in everything @ ASU. As long as the school is making $.