<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Twitter Adds Threaded Replies; Complicates Developers&amp;#8217; Lives</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_09511/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:41:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Adds Threaded Replies; Complicates Developers&amp;#8217; Lives</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/16/twitter-threaded-replies/#comment-6015588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is pretty huge, I don't expect this to kill the @username usage but I do expect to see a heck of a lot more conversations on Twitter in the future.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:41:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Adds Threaded Replies; Complicates Developers&amp;#8217; Lives</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/16/twitter-threaded-replies/#comment-6015587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have no clue what anybody finds so special about Twitter except it's a buzzword. I tried it last year and was immediately bored by it. It's more boring than Myspace or Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've avoided internet buzzwords since the late 90's and the dot com crash. Plus, I'm not sure I'm ready to be a "Twit" and "Tweet". Lame...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:38:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Adds Threaded Replies; Complicates Developers&amp;#8217; Lives</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/16/twitter-threaded-replies/#comment-6015586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You and me both - It'll be a boon to Twitter and the world the day they decide to federate it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 06:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Adds Threaded Replies; Complicates Developers&amp;#8217; Lives</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/16/twitter-threaded-replies/#comment-6015585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I've been saying this for a while. Hell, these things are already well documented with RFCs and reference implimentations! There's no reason each ensuing generation has to suck so hard.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Twitter had even the basic functionality of IRC, it'd be inherently federated and distributed. We'd get nice crosspost elimination on FriendFeed if they'd just go check the UUCP RFCs. And so on. Why, why, why?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, wait -- it's because the Web 2.0 generation think they're the first ones to ever invent a network service. The Eternal September, come 'round again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Williams</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:00:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Adds Threaded Replies; Complicates Developers&amp;#8217; Lives</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/16/twitter-threaded-replies/#comment-6015584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article Mark.  I agree with you on the FriendFeed competition - this is the main reason a lot of people use FriendFeed.  And you're right, it is wishful thinking to think Twitter will be Federated.  I'll keep wishing though ;-)  Thanks for sharing!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:59:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Adds Threaded Replies; Complicates Developers&amp;#8217; Lives</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/16/twitter-threaded-replies/#comment-6015583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is already so complicated that, I am tired of adding this and that...I may just give up...First it was simple, now getting more and more complicated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jobin Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:01:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Adds Threaded Replies; Complicates Developers&amp;#8217; Lives</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/16/twitter-threaded-replies/#comment-6015582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Was a snap ti implement. Wonderfully simple API. &lt;a href="http://yooplace.com/17lv/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://yooplace.com/17lv/"&gt;http://yooplace.com/17lv/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Bikeev</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 06:23:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Adds Threaded Replies; Complicates Developers&amp;#8217; Lives</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/08/16/twitter-threaded-replies/#comment-6015581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And in 15 years we also maybe arrive at features available on IRC and usenet ten years ago like crosspost elimination (better aggregation), watch and kill filter plus scoring ... *sigh* it is not that the information is not there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Threading has been done in usenet, and all the problems around it are solved as well, devs just would have to look back into the specs and go on from there instead of reinventing everything. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicole Simon (Berlin, Germany)</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 06:14:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>