-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2008/07/28/cuil-search-google/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
4 hours ago · 90 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
3 hours ago · 16 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
4 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
5 hours ago · 28 comments
-
BREAKING: Google Launches Real-Time Search Results
1 day ago · 96 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
I am not too sure about the name - it sounds like and is almost spelt like a rather rude French word...
We’ll be back soon...
Due to overwhelming interest, our Cuil servers are running a bit hot right now. The search engine is momentarily unavailable as we add more capacity.
Thanks for your patience.
---
I want to know who their PR people are. I'm seeing a story about the launch of a new search engine on the front page of my local newspaper's website. Very impressive.
Enter a search and you will get a zillion results, all the same few sites.
They say that the size of the site or the popularity of the site is not important in their ratings.
Every single result on the first page of anything that you search is a professional site, which may have absolutely nothing on the subject of the search.
Entering random URLs in your bar will be just as helpfull as this search engine
You do raise a very interesting point, that all [most] webpages are designed to be optimised for Google, so Google will be better.
Thanks
Steve
for even mildly complex searches, we go no results returned
Of course the Search Engine is only a few hours old. Surely Google was just as bad during its day of debut.
Disclosure: I'm not a Microsoft fan.
Only Chuck Norris can find Chuck Norris! oh... and Google.
The 2,3 columns layout is dope!
Booo.
And most results are not unique.
They won't win the race, like all the other "semantic" engines.
Interesting article. A couple of corrections though. Tom never worked at Google. Anna did, as did Russell and Louis.
Also, Cuil seems to have a bug that causes it to show 0 results in some cases the first time you search for something. If you do that same query again, it returns plenty of results. This is the case with your example, DFI Nforce 4. http://www.cuil.com/search?q=DFI+Nforce+4
I'm getting 186k results.
I don't necessarily agree that a search engines has to be Google to beat Google. After all, if the choices are Google and exactly-like-Google, then why would searchers switch. Cuil has an interesting approach in that they're trying to be completely different from Google. However, for a number of reasons, I don't think they've yet managed to build something that competes (yet). Even if they manage that feat (which is obstacle enough), they would still have to get a large percentage of searchers to leave something that's not broken and that's become a habit.
This comment spoils the article from the start. I am sure some people thought the same about the horse and buggy.
I suppose every search should start with a wikipedia entry and some big brands.