<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Glam Signs Google for Ad Brokerage and Search</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_0908/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:38:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Glam Signs Google for Ad Brokerage and Search</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/05/glam-google/#comment-5949562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So what?  Glam's network of sites are absolute crap.  Have you looked at them Pete?  What sort of a user experience does a site like &lt;a href="http://www.2haircut.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.2haircut.com/"&gt;http://www.2haircut.com/&lt;/a&gt; give to the user?  Glam's people are good at SEO, little more.  They are an example of what is wrong with Google.  Because without Google sending tons of traffic to their artificially ranked sites, they would be nothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:38:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Signs Google for Ad Brokerage and Search</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/05/glam-google/#comment-5949561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thumbsup to Glam as usual! Rock on!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terry Ng</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:45:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Signs Google for Ad Brokerage and Search</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/05/glam-google/#comment-5949560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pete, this is entirely opt-in for larger Glam publishers (like b5). We're about as anti-AdSense as you can get, and the Glam team have been great from the get-go in asserting it wasn't a requirement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Wright</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:37:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>