<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in WTF is Cisco Doing?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_0847/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:15:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WTF is Cisco Doing?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/03/wtf-is-cisco-doing/#comment-5923453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Many acquisitions are not about current technology, but are about what that team might be able to build in the future, with different resources. I have no idea if that's the case here, but looking at past products may not be an accurate predictor of future work...?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Dowdell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTF is Cisco Doing?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/03/wtf-is-cisco-doing/#comment-5923452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That Andreessen quote is a cheap shot. Despite the fact that Marc's old "reducing them to ... buggy device drivers" is one of my favorite all-time quotes, this one just begs the retort, maybe Ning actually would be better at building optical switches. After all, the remain unproven as a SNS or even as an SNS-toolbuilder.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Antonio Rodriguez</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:51:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTF is Cisco Doing?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/03/wtf-is-cisco-doing/#comment-5923451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is "Corporate Social Networking" the "Corporate Knowledge Management (KM)" of the "new" bubble? Huzzah!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trypto</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:48:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTF is Cisco Doing?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/03/wtf-is-cisco-doing/#comment-5923450</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had the identical thought when I read the note.  Weird.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Douglas Karr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:05:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTF is Cisco Doing?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/03/wtf-is-cisco-doing/#comment-5923449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ning is Yahoo Groups 2.0. It will be home to clutter and ghost town social networks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cisco has billions more and an internal sales force with contact to a lot of enterprise customers. I don't know that they will become a social networking success but the odds that Cisco pulls it off are a lot more plausible than Ning going into optical switches. Marc sounds like a guy who's put $9 million into something that will face massive competition and will say aynthing to create an impression that he's confident.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jordan Michaels</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTF is Cisco Doing?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/03/wtf-is-cisco-doing/#comment-5923448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just want to say that the title to the article is great - It gave me a good laugh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wantz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 15:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTF is Cisco Doing?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/03/03/wtf-is-cisco-doing/#comment-5923447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like Marc Andreessen and all, but he's one to talk in the WTF category.  Wasn't Ning's first efforts a bust.  Note, that he's still applying a similar biz model to this new reincarnation.  Hmmm...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for Tribe, their underlying technology platform was worth a lot more than any of the incumbents and redeployed in a diff model could open up some interesting opportunities.  Note that Aggregate Knowledge came from some of the learnings at Tribe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for Cisco, they've already declared that they would be diversifying into the Web 2.0 world and services, so this is no real big surprise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">P-Air</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:04:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>