<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_0818/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:19:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent comment, I agree a hundred percent.  I am amazed that anybody even thinks there's a big difference between Republicans and Democrats anymore.  Each party has unique members, but by and large, without donkeys and elephants, or R's and D's, or Red and Blue states, nobody would even know the difference between the two anymore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;gjgejgeroiPJPJROJPGJRJFQOFFKDJTFDJOO3JR IOJHIOJYUOIUJHJPTYOTIJOIJYIJHLKJ KLHJGOKHLGJHUOIUOILPOU12356780M VBM,V,MNB,MNBMBMNM,BNM,,BNMN,NV,M,NB,M,B,BVM,BVM,BVNM,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry my son wanted to type something.  I think it means "Screw you Fox News!" I'm just guessing though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dustin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:19:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"@N-Noid: Is B. Hussein Obama not his name? If this is incorrect, I'll change it."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ohhhh, okay. See, pretty much everyone else calls him by his first and last name, Barack Obama. In fact, it's customary to refer to others by their first name. It's actually kind of odd to assume to call someone by their middle name unless they request it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That being so, it might seem like you're trying to emphasize the "Hussein" part of his name and draw a subconscious connection between the name of the young Democratic Senator and the name of one of the most reviled, hated, widely known enemies of America. So some might consider it a cheap shot from a partisan hack.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But that's not what you were doing. You're an analyst. You're above that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Desspec</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From Rizzn's wikipedia Entry:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"In 2005 he made official his libertarian affiliations by going to work for the candidate for Texas Legislature T. Evan Fisher as his campaign manager."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have a right to do and say what you want. But you won't be doing it in my inbox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:51:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kyle, you are right, it is not just analysis (though  it is flawed) it is the Ann Coulterism attitude that is gratting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Basically don't be a dick!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">B</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:09:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"only in rare cases have the presidential Republican candidates contradicted themselves"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh please... you'd have to be a dittohead to think that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's with the partisan posting here?  mashable isn't a partisan site, why let this sort of drivel be posted here?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ME</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:02:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark, it's not so much your analysis that seems to have pissed people off, it's your attitude. If you treated the players (both politicians and readers) with more respect, I suspect you would have fewer negative comments. People generally don't mind if you disagree with them, it's the name-calling they don't like.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kyle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:45:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987733</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Again, I don't see my agenda as "hidden" so much as "out in the open."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's called analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark \</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Mashable allows posts with hidden political comments and agendas such as these, I would not be surprised to see a DIGG like revolt by fellow Mashable users.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andy&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Rosillo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:10:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clinton's answer was not complex.  It was convoluted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Romney's position changed over the course of the better part of a decade, and throughout the campaign has been fairly consistent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not here to debate illegal immigration with you.  I'm actually on your side of the debate on that one. As I'm married into a hispanic family and live in Texas, I'm likely in a much better position to comment intelligently than others.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Speaking to consistency, honesty, and strategy of the parties (which I was in the above article), the Republicans have the Democrats beat hands down.  I'm sorry if you're unwilling to face that, but its the sad, sorry truth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark \</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you counting the flip flopping on sexuality?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mostlyfreeideas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:02:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987729</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So far, I can only think of two specific instances where video of a candidate from 06 that could pretty clearly be linked to the result of an election. Conrad Burns and his firefighter comments. George Allen and his macacca comments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm gonna go with the fact that video will make candidates more accountable for what they say, and hope that the result is a place where all video footage regardless of party or candidate is available. My guess is that regardless of what side of the political aisle you sit on, you are sick of politicians just saying whatever they want depending on the audience they are in front of.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mostlyfreeideas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:01:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tim: Actually, yeah.  Most people who read the polls (not just of conservative persuasion) are of the opinion that the Republicans are doing well this cycle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.memeorandum.com/071127/p164#a071127p164" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.memeorandum.com/071127/p164#a071127p164"&gt;http://www.memeorandum.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just about anyone on the Republican side polls better than just about anyone on the Democrat side.  Even Huckabee and Ron Paul&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark \"Rizzn\" Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:01:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This isn't meant to bait you, but are you really under the impression that Republicans are going to do well in '08? It's also not intended to be a comment saying Democrats are better than Republicans, butthere isn't a single reputable pollster or political commentator (conservative or liberal) that doesn't currently believe that '08 is likely to be worse for Republicans than '06. I mean, bending reality is a great concept but you don't think you can really do it, do you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mostlyfreeideas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:56:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the linkage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CCNA Discovery</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:57:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;rofl, yeah it's "tha evil libruls" that are not bright.  It's not like conservatives are idiot inbreeders who drink bud light and speek in southern draws.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  nah, that's the "libruls"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">centrex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Bright"?  Coming from someone who uses the word, "methinks"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kevin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:42:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So Clinton gave a complex answer to a complex question and you compare that to Romney's changing position on major issues, rights for gays, abortion, immigration, just before running for president?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While on the surface giving driver licenses to illegal immigrants seems not the way to go, if you look at the issue you realize that they are here if we like it or not, and they drive, so one might rather have them licensed so they have to take a test and thus be at least some what safer drivers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So until the federal gov't does something about illegal immigration state gov'ts have to deal with &lt;br&gt;safety issues of driving. Now one can disagree with  giving licenses but it clearly is a complex issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;of course you don't want to talk about issues, you want to take cheap shots. There are true conservative/republicans out there who want to move the country forward, you are not one of them. Where is  Barry Goldwater when you need him?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">B</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:27:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is that so?  You on Yahoo Pipes?  I'll share it with you.  This is the second Republican-friendly post in as many weeks.  And ignorantly so.  I'll stick with Mashable for tech news.  If I want to hear about "Pretty Boys," I'll go to Fox News.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:37:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"This will end up back-firing on the Democrats, in the long run. First of all, only in rare cases have the presidential Republican candidates contradicted themselves, and never three times in a matter of minutes, like Senator Clinton has, for example. Beyond the politics and behavioral studies of various political candidates, the value of providing hours of raw footage of Republican candidates has far more inherent value to Republican supporters than Democrats. Republican conservative online video producers and bloggers, for instance, now have a wealth of source material to pepper their productions with."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You could not be more correct!  great commentary!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BrianR</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:05:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark, what's going on at Mashable lately?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You guys used to post items and offer some decent analysis, but lately it seems like it's just reposting stuff you're read somewhere else and not even looking at the original sources. *cough*Stan*cough*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And, like this post, there's detectable traces of bitterness. Is something up?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kyle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:57:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been reading blogs too long to actually believe any of you that state you will unsubscribe, or create a "san Mark Hopkins" pipe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The same people bitching here...will be bitching 15 posts down the road. Why make idle threats?  You guys know you like to bitch and disagree ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">E.T.Cook</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:51:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This will be the post that gets me to mashup Mashable.  Look for the Mashable sans Mark Hopkins Pipe on Yahoo! shortly!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:44:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You must be purposefully ignoring the issue re: Obama's name. *Obviously* B. Hussein Obama is one way of writing his name. So is Barack Obama, as all reputable news sources do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So given a couple different options, why did you choose to use just an initial for his first name, but include his entire middle name? Because the name Hussein reminds people (even if sub-consciously) of Sadam Hussein. If not Sadam himself, it at least carries connotations of Islam and the middle east.&lt;br&gt;And I didn't realize that "Pretty Boy" is John Edwards' official nickname...oh wait, it's not? You mean it's another editorialization?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally, I think that these cheap shots are petty and unprofessional.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mark, you are obviously a talented writer. You are entitled to your opinions, political and otherwise, but please, please keep the editorializations out of news posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:20:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Mark&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regardless of your political affiliations, its nice to get the other side of things for once.  There are so many democratic blowhards, whether I agree with you or not is immaterial, thank God there is another opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@B&lt;br&gt;And Ann Coulter zealotry site?  A bit of a sensationalist don't you think?  And  please learn how to spell.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">E.T.Cook</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Launch Large Republican Video Archive</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/democrats-launch-large-republican-video-archive/#comment-5987712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@N-Noid: Is B. Hussein Obama not his name?  If this is incorrect, I'll change it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With respect to other Republican *candidates*, there has been much less flip-flopping on the issues than on the Democrat side. When a candidate changes his position over a 10 year period as opposed to a 4 minute period, you can hardly call these two things the same.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@PB: I didn't think my agenda was all that hidden, to be truthful.  I've been very open and honest about my political positions since I've begun my tenure here at Mashable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:45:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>