<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Facebook Trapped By Microsoft Ad Deal</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_0741/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:32:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Trapped By Microsoft Ad Deal</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/03/facebook-trapped-by-microsoft-ad-deal/#comment-5905069</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone considered that maybe FB just doesn't want to sell :)?  For anyone keeping up to speed with their new features (I don't mean reading reviews, but actually USING them) you'd know that FB is much bigger than a 1B idea.  Youtube, on the other hand, should sell.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:32:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Trapped By Microsoft Ad Deal</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/03/facebook-trapped-by-microsoft-ad-deal/#comment-5905068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thats amazing. I dont really think its a mis step. You cant plan on your business being bought out like this. Maybe the MS partnership scarred Yahoo into believing they needed to buy them as they were the odd ones out. 10 mil would be a nice out and is nothing really, MS would rather have the ads running and would make more than 10 mil and establish themselves as a solid PPC player.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Manager Assistant</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:25:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Trapped By Microsoft Ad Deal</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/03/facebook-trapped-by-microsoft-ad-deal/#comment-5905067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Trapped?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Innit a bit like a straw being trapped by its paper wrapper?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:40:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Trapped By Microsoft Ad Deal</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/03/facebook-trapped-by-microsoft-ad-deal/#comment-5905066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Guys.. what you expect from a company run by a 22 yr old who had a stroke of luck and is running out of luck soon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The deal with having to pay M$ for breaking the deal is totally absurb.. so definitely its a deal made without much considering/negotiation ... the lack of realworld experience is the key&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JohnTV</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:06:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Trapped By Microsoft Ad Deal</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/03/facebook-trapped-by-microsoft-ad-deal/#comment-5905065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So is Yahoo admitting defeat then of it's own product (Yahoo360) if it is in fact pursuing the purchase of Facebook?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:14:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Trapped By Microsoft Ad Deal</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/03/facebook-trapped-by-microsoft-ad-deal/#comment-5905064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Facebook's deal with Microsoft brought more value to the company's brand. It must've prompted Yahoo and other companies to see Facebook as something potentially profitable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jawad Shuaib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:49:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>