-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2008/06/02/plurk-better-than-twitter/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Jennifer Van Grove
156 comments · 26 points
-
r0cketman22
334 comments · 56 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
172 comments · 5 points
-
paramendra
156 comments · 39 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
BlackBerry Outage Affecting North America
4 hours ago · 86 comments
-
Facebook Is Destroying the Sanctity of Marriage [REPORT]
7 hours ago · 28 comments
-
Firefox 4.0: New Design Changes Revealed [IMAGES]
14 hours ago · 48 comments
-
Social Media Experts Make Their Predictions for Trends in 2010
11 hours ago · 23 comments
-
Nexus One and Android 2.1 Walkthrough Surfaces [VIDEO]
6 hours ago · 11 comments
-
BlackBerry Outage Affecting North America
Wouldn't Twitter actually need to "function" for "function" to win out? Twitter for the past 3 weeks is really starting to break at the seams. And things are going to get worse before they get better. Twitter basically needs to redesign it's architecture from the ground up to be able to effectively save itself.
BTW, as I type this, the Twitter website is once again inaccessible (so is the API as Twhirl is not pulling tweets either)
It's like a site for status' as far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't use either of these sites. I can let my friends know what I'm doing on facebook through status msgs.. and maybe something that twitter should or could look into is parterning up with facebook to either do an app with status format... or status powered by twitter. Something to that effect. Maybe there is more to twitter then I'm giving credit to but it just seems like another site to me and a waste to constantly update.
Twitter is having problems because we the users turned it into what it wasn't supposed to be: a chat room, instead of that quirky little 140 character update(trust me, you can get around that limit, just post over and over).
Twitter is a bit retarded in functionality, but in the social space, it ain't about function. It's about social. It's the trendy hot spot where you go to be seen (well myspace/facebook-- oh nm, it's a losing argument), it's a trendy hot spot for the early web/tech adopters go to be seen. The iPod isn't the best -featured- mp3 player, it just has the sexiness and the social power to command the world domination (for now).
Plurk is fun, shiny, and prolly will stick if the big names show up.
How fickle we humans are. ;)
(Sorry for the huge-ish comment, doh!)
I think the underlying problem here is the same as we had with IM (are still having with IM) where the networks can't communicate. If most of my friends are on MSN, then it makes sense for me to use MSN.
I know people on twitter, therefore, that's what I use.
Now, should the micro-bloggers get together and say "hey, let's share" and give us addresses like salmonmoose@twitter.com then I could have friends on all the networks, and choose the one with the features that suit me best. Kind of like email.
Joined this morning and the only thing I am afraid is that if they get hit as Twitter they might have same problems. yet plurk is more fun then twitter to be honest. Only thing I need on plurk now is twitter feed :)
Just need plurk to integrate with FriendFeed, and I'll be set.
I'm http://www.plurk.com/user/waynesutton on plurk.
Between running a business and getting the kids to and from nursery, fed, etc, there isn't time for social networking.
Are all Twitter / Plurk users unemployed / students, or corporate employees who are avoiding work?
Some of us don't actually have time for a social life for the very reasons you state. And some of us don't *want* to.
Your point is very valid.
Hey I have no friends to Plurk. So add me so I can see how this works. It's not bad but it's no Twitter by a long shot.
Eric: "the users turned [Twitter] into what it wasn't supposed to be" ... dang those pesky users, eh? Always doing whatever they want, never following instructions or reading the manual... It doesn't make sense to my mind to say how Twitter (or any social app) is supposed to be used. It will get used however the users choose. They'll push and they'll prod to find what it's best for, find what it's limits are. Twitter's challenge now is to recognize how the service is being used and adapt appropriately.
The question isn't does it have enough beef for the "Power users" but can it make guys like me who didn't really get twitter want to use it. Oh yeah and Can it stay online for a week without crashing.
http://plurk.com/redeemByURL?from_uid=16932&...
Otherwise it's just a slightly differently rendered Twitter wannabe. without downtime. or userbase.
http://plurk.com/redeemByURL?from_uid=28490&...
Apparently, it's all about what you want from the tool. Some people like cutesy and lots of emoticons and a heavy emphasis with on the social in social networking.
I prefer the log file format of Twitter precisely because I use it as a repository of little notes. I like seeing what my friends are up to but I don't want to be drawn into a lot of long conversations with them. In fact, I signed up for Twitter because I wanted to know at a glance what my friends were up to without having to interrupt them (or be interrupted by them) with IM, email, or a phone call.
hdpfihpwof
http://xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com/
http://xn--mgb0azbm.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com/
http://xn--mgbbh4i.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com/
http://xn--mgbad0esc.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com/