<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_03822/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:40:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6295603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hallo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">omare</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:40:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6648404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hallo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">omare</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:40:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No one would've predicted the death of traditional TV when shows were cancelled in the past. How is this any different?  At &lt;a href="http://CraftyNation.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="CraftyNation.com"&gt;CraftyNation.com&lt;/a&gt;  we're producing niche market &lt;a href="http://craftynation.com/articles/25" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://craftynation.com/articles/25"&gt;VIDEOS&lt;/a&gt; that we hope will encourage viewers to join our community.  As we distribute the videos beyond our social network, we hope viewers will be inspired to join our community.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Long</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:55:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll be watching you and your vituperative attacks in the defense of bad business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did you take the fall for a bad acquisition?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Online Video Observer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:01:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Think...you're a donkey. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Mehoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:23:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gag_name" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gag_name"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt; = Jack Mehoff&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You seem so angry about the analysis of 5 million. It was a bad deal.&lt;br&gt;Think Billions for &lt;a href="http://Broadcast.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Broadcast.com"&gt;Broadcast.com&lt;/a&gt; by Yahoo or 25 million for Engagdet and the other lame blogs to AOL&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Down the drain. Nice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Online Video Observer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:33:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In my honest opinion, I think each of you is a pathetic loser with absolutely nothing to do.  Reading and actually commenting on a BLOG about a meaningless company and analyzing the M&amp;amp;A activity in the WHOPPING $5M range is about as meaningless an existence as one could have.  You should find a hobby...like MAKING FUN of losers like you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Mehoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:17:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;check this out: &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aROay5kufxc" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aROay5kufxc"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">romeizburing</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:45:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Internet Television is going to be held to the same standards as terrestrial boxes, it's going to fail. If it's just a different vector for the same type of show, it will fail. Name one show from the internet that follows an identical form (plotting, production, casting, marketing) to terrestrial TV. You can't. If the show was that good, it would have ended up on TV, and stuck. We're still in very early days for IPTV.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Semiote23</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi adam -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I believe we are still the first inning of web video.  tv shows are cancelled every year after many more millions are spent.  people need to get some perspective on these things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howard lindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wallstrip was sold for 5 million on a perception basis and the fact that it was funded by a well-heel well-connected rich dude. It was easy for him to negotiate such a large sell-out price.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The facts are the show never had a large audience. It had a buzz among the well connected and well-heeled for a bit, but that set doesn't particularly watch online video.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder if the rich dude who funded the show continued to tell all his well-heeled friends to check it after he sold it? Probably not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CBS didn't really know what to do with the show, and at 5 million dollars starting in the red ink after it's acquisition, how was it going to make money? Most ad sales teams don't know how to sell for online video, yet - and I'm sure they rather ring the bell for a huge on air sale than cloud the waters with pushing a online video sale that generates enough commission for a cab ride home the Chelsea after doing a line of coke at Veloce.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CBS didn't know what to do with the show online. There online video strategy in that area was really poor. Online video is for infecting other sites and jacking their traffic, not for building a portal/destination site at the moment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">online video hustle bunny</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:08:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the real story is that CBS paid 5 Million Dollars &lt;br&gt;for an online show! WallStrip is still the victor. &lt;br&gt;I'm sure they didn't have to give the money back.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And a warning to all video shows that sign on the dotted line with a big corporate company.&lt;br&gt;You are at their mercy...and they have very little.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, and check out my show at &lt;a href="http://www.thedogfiles.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.thedogfiles.com"&gt;http://www.thedogfiles.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Big, giant, scary corporate companies especially!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kenn at Dog Files</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:53:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"The media company is spinning the news by claiming they plan to â€œtake the DNA from WallStrip and apply itâ€ to other online properties."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This might be less spin than it seems. Wallstrip's original host, Lindsay Campbell, moved onto another project also by CBS, &lt;a href="http://www.moblogic.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.moblogic.tv"&gt;http://www.moblogic.tv&lt;/a&gt; - mind you, production there seems to have slowed down a bit as well as of late...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adrianliem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think it's an omen. Online video viewership continues to soar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If a CBS broadcast drama or sitcom was canceled, we wouldn't say the entire&lt;br&gt;channel is in jeopardy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WallStrip probably could have succeeded in the hands of another owner, or&lt;br&gt;if it had remained independent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathania</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:37:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is WallStrip’s Cancellation an Omen for Original Online Video?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/07/is-wallstrip%e2%80%99s-cancellation-an-omen-for-original-online-video/#comment-6036038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Of course, the cancellation of WallStrip could be a one-off â€“ a show that focuses on soaring stocks doesnâ€™t work so well when the stock market is tanking"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think that is a good bet. As for making money on online videos that spread virally-- I think if anything we will find out who is the 'best'. Hard to say.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Sherwin @ Myartspace Blo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>