<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/the_web_in_numbers_twitter8217s_phenomenal_growth_suddenly_stops/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:04:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-15887032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you on this one - so much media hype the month before leads to a return to normal growth patters. Also, I wonder if some of these numbers could be Twitter beginning to crack down on spammers and deleting bogus accounts. I doubt that that could account for these kind of numbers, but, it is a factor that has not been mentioned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CathyWebSavvyPR</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:04:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-13739984</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with this 100%. Combined with the fact that there are better social networkings such as facebook and myspace, Twitter is going to only appeal to a certain group, mostly of older people, since twitter is mainly promoted on news programs and other media shows. Most younger people will stick with either Facebook or Myspace.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rockbandpromotion</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:37:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-12318011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally...i'm sick of these stupid websites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:53:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-12235102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This video is better!!!! just see it!!!.....http://&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2oHNj1zbeQ" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2oHNj1zbeQ"&gt;www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2o...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:41:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-11575830</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know what percentage of college students are using Twitter? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mara Lewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:55:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10899611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I heard that twitter was having an issue with users creating accounts then not re-visiting them. They need to pull people in through reminders or some other method. Plus unlike facebook all my friends under 30 do not use twitter so in simple it says people don't understand it or just don't have  don't get tweeting. Users under 30 want to play games, watch videos interact with friends and live chat etc. I can't see twitter following suit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sahus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10899597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I heard that twitter was having an issue with users creating accounts then not re-visiting them. They need to pull people in through reminders or some other method. Plus unlike facebook all my friends under 30 do not use twitter so in simple it says people don't understand it or just don't have  don't get tweeting. Users under 30 want to play games, watch videos interact with friends and live chat etc. I can't see twitter following suit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sahus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:46:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10889786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Me personally, I don't get it.  Chat Rooms, shouts and IM's have been around for years.  Same with Bulletin Boards, Forums and Blogs.  What's the dif?  You text somebody's phone to talk to them?  Ya gotta phone in your hand...talk!!   RSS:   Internet Explorer had "Push" channels in IE 4, what's the difference?  Yahoo gave you the website they wanted to, Google gives you the ads!  Progress?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dinosaur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:23:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10760164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This could be because most of the regular Twitter users end up using clients like Twitterific, Tweet Deck or Nambu.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faisal Laljee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:31:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10742850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Using Quantcast to validate Compete's numbers?  Not sure that instills much confidence in the conclusions .  What does Hitwise data show? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:45:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10703599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Everything has it saturation point not matter product or Fad, but the fact remains twitter has spawned a whole new arena for all internet marketers and socialites alike, it will continue to grow and be used to the max. Twitter is the new wave of internet viral marketing on steroids that's for sure, its the numbers game same as all the rest, although this report is very interesting.&lt;br&gt;To all a great and profitable day. Ryan &lt;a href="http://www.constructmedia.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.constructmedia.com"&gt;www.constructmedia.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10693029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Get adblock or privoxy &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:29:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10690930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems more likely to be that March and April represent a spike from Ashton/CNN and Oprah, while May represents a return to the pre-existing slower-growth trend.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just eyeballing the chart, that's what it looks like to me: draw a smooth curve forward based on the pre-March numbers, and March and April look out of line, while May looks about right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Shaum</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:26:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10674068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, um, with the rise of apps for twitter I rarely sign-in.  Most of my followers are using other apps as well to post to Twitter.  People are just getting more savvy when it comes to Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article screams "alarmist" or "the boat is sinking".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I stopped reading Techcrunch for this B.S. reporting.  Don't make me stop reading you as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/adult" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/adult"&gt;http://twitter.com/adult&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adult</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10670740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Calculating Twitter usage should incorporate website statistics from &lt;a href="http://Twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Twitter.com"&gt;Twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; and Twitter API usage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">igruber</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10667387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These post that claim a slowdown in Twitter growth are so far off the mark, since I never log on  to Twitter.. I use apps.  Notice how Twitter doesn't defend themselves.. it's better to grow stealthily!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HotForWords</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:39:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10666658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Numbers, numbers, numbers... WITHOUT significant revenue (or a path to it), this numbers mean very little. May be someone can come up with an equation that takes into account: value proposition, # of users, adoption, penetration, "disruptive" force, etc. to be able to "quantify" how much revenue "X" service should be generating. Then we can apply this equation across the board to all Social Networks and see how they REALLY compare! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blog364</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:17:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10665284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, this seems to proof that Twitter is a great loss of time, like many people state.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tedel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:49:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10661618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh oh. Lone basket: some eggs might be cheating on you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">swag</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:50:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10655177</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apps/Smapps....This article is only a precursor for twitter apps et all to combine forces since we will ALL be on one platform eventually....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hamzadavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:17:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10653410</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not a twitter fan. Got on and don't use it. I definitely see it's application, but the hysteria around it is convincing many of our corporate advertising clients to expect more from Twitter than it can deliver. The real question is whether some powerful Twitter apps start to catch fire. We will continue to recommend clients look at Twitter, but frankly, the jury is still out on whether the service is starting to plateau and will have limited, but specific application.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gordon McMilln</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10652258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The real question is: are all these numbers already an indication for a successful business model? If problogger tells me that he did a sales pitch for his new book on Facebook with several 1000s friends and there was no real earning, but in other cases the sales rocked. What does this mean?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rainer Eschen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:55:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10651862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;zOMG! shocking!  Oprah doesn't tweet a KFC coupon and Ashton has better things to do (like  a career or his wife).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can't wait to see the 20+ articles that come from mashable reporting the steady slope downfall of Twitter over the course of the rest of 2009&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doubledown Tandino</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10651756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mashable : why the hell are you displaying a scientology banner on your site - lame !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sash</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:40:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web in Numbers: Twitter&amp;#8217;s Phenomenal Growth Suddenly Stops</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/web-in-numbers-may/#comment-10650995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;is this really shocking? We use twitter, but come on, this is the most overrated site out right now. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">conflictinthesky</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:13:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>