-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/gen-y-social-media-study/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
10 hours ago · 109 comments
-
Holiday Mojo: What Kind of Seasonal Twitter User Are You?
4 hours ago · 13 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
6 hours ago · 22 comments
-
Redbox: The Enemy of the Entertainment Industry? [STUDY]
2 hours ago · 8 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
10 hours ago · 31 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Narcissists need not think they're "too good" for social media (maybe in 1999-2001, but not now....now Facebook is too big for even them to ignore and so the narcissists only resort is to be the hottest most popular kings and queens of social media to satisfy their insecure egos.
...This coming from a Gen Y'er (barely) who got on Facebook back in 2001 but only uses it sparingly now.
If you are trying to make a point by exaggerating at least get your facts straight.
this is the product of a merchant satiating the people and not necessarily leading them to where they should be. and that's because they don't decide where society should go.. though they narrowly curate it to end up a particular way (so they can measure it, and convert data into dollars).
feeding the mob with the juicy gossip they want.
Happy Belial Day
Follow me on twitter!
"Self-promotion. Narcissism. Attention seeking."
Sounds like LinkedIn -- I'm sure this generation will understand personal branding and do very well in business, if they are picking this up already.
Just kinda kidding.
lets face it, people are impressionable in new surroundings and if all we see is self-promotion, then that's all we may try to do just to fit in. However, when they don't realize what purpose certain kinds of self-promotion serve (business), then that's when it becomes primal narcissism and a popularity contest. and if the culture that surrounds us and them wasn't built on self-promotion/self-preservation, then I don't know what it was built on...
but there's something else going on: self-empowerment.
My teenage son thinks anyone who's talking about doing well is engaging in self-aggrandizement. But when he brags it is nothing but the truth.
Consider the source?
More substantially, I have young friends on twitter and facebook. Most of them are light and playful types, smart, gifted, and engaging in their share of ego and such -- but they also organize projects, painting parties to help nonprofits freshen churches and nonprofit offices, and various service projects. They coordinate art performances -- drama and music.
On the other hand, I look at the public timeline on twitter and it's easy to see it as pure trash. But my friends on twitter are a lovely bunch of folks who work in technology (including social media!), who are avid gamers, who work and play in virtual worlds and the gaming industry, or who are progressive/liberal folks, and a whole slew of journalist and human rights types.
If you take a broad survey, it's like looking at the public timeline. You know, more people use paper for doodling or printing crap they recycle (at least, I hope they recycle...!) without reading in their homes. But it doesn't make the use of paper trivial to society.
This GAL knows what SHE'S talking about!
Tips for creating a smoking personal brand http://www.trigeia.com/article.php?id=88037
What surprises me, however, is how many people -- of all ages -- are *not* involved in social media. They're busy with something they call "life". Has anyone heard of this?
Here are things that make life worthwhile and what determines if you have a "life": something to do, something to love and something to hope for.
Something to do: career, hobbies, interests--you meet with people via social networks to discuss these things, plan meet ups, get information, network for a career and share photographs after. People no more or less have a life than those who choose not to use social media...the only difference for many is that they are sharing that life with others in a format that varies from a telephone or letter and that is ok.
Something to love: lovers, friends, family--all use social media networks to stay connected when they are far apart and often deepen those relationships because of it. I talk to one of my sisters across the country more now because of FB since it is free unlike some long distance call plans and we can share media with each other and other friends. Friends reunite via social media and lovers have even met via social media sites.
Something to hope for: social causes, political action/change, religious groups or perhaps changing career to something better--people can get involved in through social media networks. There are many people who have "no life" and Internet surf other things all day and do not use social media networks. Using the Internet or not does not automatically determine whether the person has a "life." What matters is how they define that life. Social media can facilitate those definitions and desires.
Furthermore, these are students completing a poll and are not professional mental health clinicians "diagnosing" people with Narcissistic Personality Disorder. We have to be careful to clarify such things. Some business people use other forms of marketing and hate social media and they are still engaging in self-promotion. Are they narcissistic as well? Self promotion and narcissism differ. There is certainly some truth to the idea that students are able to view other students in their own age gorup in somewhat of an accurate perspective. But this "age of entitlement" that the whole study concerns itself with doesn't apply to every population type in gen Y of American society...believe that. I think that those who would fall into that gap probably grew up within a culture, family and lifestyle that is already one of entitlement whether they openly accept that or not. I would like to see this Professor's research just on the age of entitlement in general.
So, is social media about narcissism and self promotion? Hell, yes. At least a big chunk of it is. Look at the efforts some put into building a following for themselves. Some congratulate themselves in Tweets for having achieved a certain number of followers. One "social media expert" who has thousands of followers thought so much of herself that she announced her birthday 26 times via Tweets a couple of months ago. WTF? We all publish stuff because we think we have something to say that's at least important to us - and hoping it is to someone else (ie, responses like this one).
Are there business applications for social networking? Sure. Can it be used for the common good? Absolutely. We're free to use it any way we want to. And maybe someone at the other end might care.
And then again, maybe they won't (ie., responses like this one).
David Strandberg, Minneapolis
http://web.mac.com/david.strandberg
Facebook makes me uncomfortable :(
in other more important news...
RIP Ted Kennedy
Add up the the "neither agree/disagree" and the "disagree somewhat" = ~ 39%
Now look at the "agree somewhat" ~ 36%
It's a meaningless tie!
When you ask an utterly slanted and loaded questions like "Do you think your peers are a bunch of vain butt-heads" and then give people 5 possible responses, you either look at the numbers more curiously (as above) or hire a new research dude who can design a more neutral guide.
Jeesh...
TK
However, I've gotten really good at scanning the garbage, ignoring the garbage (hiding feeds) and have found it to be a real time saver for keeping in touch with worthwhile friends from around the globe.
In communication research, there is a principle called the "third person effect." Basically, it describes how we feel others are frequently affected by media (news coverage, violence, et cetera), but that we ourselves are not affected. For example, "yes, people will see that news story and immediately be against healthcare reform. But no, it has no effect on me." This may be what is at work in this survey.
adam
www.blackboxstrategy.net
And that said, I think that the majority of teens at least (if not all of Gen Y and the rest of us) are narcissistic, self-promoting and attention seeking. For teens, it goes with the territory. Social media is just one of the places where they express those characteristics.
And I'm not just dissing teens. In addition to being N, S-P and A-S, they are also insecure and shy. That part of them gets expressed more in the safety of the home than in public.
At any rate, this is just an opinion poll, as someone already said. Aside from that, how do we know that other generations didn't also take this poll? Come on now.
Seriously, though, we looked at a different study showing the signs of social network narcissism a few weeks back. Turns out there are four distinct qualities that push you over the edge and officially earn you the self-lovin' label.
http://www.esarcasm.com/2181/four-signs-you-may...
This form of self-promotion isn't a social media phenomenon, but a capitalist one. You find the same self-serving behavior offline, at events where people "market themselves, work the room, pitch their companies, sell their ideas", etc.
However, I don't consider myself narcissistic or an attention-seeker. I consider myself a PR student who understands how to use the medium. I know that many of my fellow PR peers utilize Social Media for the same purposes, which I would categorize under self-promotion. The other two functions have a much more negative connotation, and they're listed after self-promotion.
As with any tool that gains any attention or popularity, there will be the people who use it to its potential, and others who abuse it and use it for the wrong reasons. I would also like to note that, in my experience, most stories you find in the news on social media are negative. This almost undoubtedly affects the perception of how it's used. I'm curious what the answer would be if the subjects were asked how THEY use social media, rather than their perception of their peers.
Gen-X pioneered the applicable uses of technology into daily life and work. For instance, e-mail is a product of Gen-X and they significantly grown the adoption of that technology to other generation. I feel Gen-Y is bridging live, social, public interactions on the Web to the mainstream.
~Joe
And to answer the point about having a life. Even if someone is spending all their "real life" time hopping from bed to bed and drinking their days away at least they are having real, visceral interactions with other human beings as opposed to spending their nights at their computer talking to their "friends" on facebook. I have plenty of "friends" on facebook, most of them are people I wouldn't want to talk to in real life. Why are they friends of mine on facebook? you ask if not in real life. Because it doesn't fucking matter. It's facebook. I would rather spend four hours at a bar getting drunk and talking to people and really getting to know random strangers than spending the same time on my computer with my "friends." If they are really your friends pick up a phone, go get a beer, have a cup of coffee, watch a movie together, make love, do something real and important and visceral and complete. That is the problem with my generation. We want instant e-gratification, we can't put in the time for real life. We want to just have something quick and easy and non-intrusive.
If this involves narcissim, one has to wonder whether that is the cause of our current culture or the effect.
http://www.blonde2dot0.com/blog/2007/09/18/what...
The old school rule said to NEVER mail a photo of yourself with a resume.
The new school rule says you must invest in personal branding which includes writing a blog and having a Facebook page, both of which will very likely include your picture.
We then hear that employers everywhere Google candidates nowadays. Why is it okay to post a picture of yourself online yet not send one via snail mail?
Though the intentions for the site may have been originally benevolent, for me it smacks of blatant self promotion in the genre of narcissim and self centeredness in a culture where everyone wants to be a celebrity/popular. And while there are surely some people on there without such traits or intentions, it also seems to be related to being pretentious, social climbing and an all around attention seeking and look at me and how many friends/connections I have attitude that pervades our culture. Are the majority of these people really your true friends?
I do not have an account but have perused the site on several occasions to feel it out. I know anytime someone ask me if I am on Facebook I have to refrain from rolling my eyes. It is much more refreshing to see an authentic person rather than an advertisement.