-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/teens-dont-tweet/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
3 hours ago · 79 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
3 hours ago · 20 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
2 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
4 hours ago · 26 comments
-
BREAKING: Google Launches Real-Time Search Results
1 day ago · 96 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Also, Nielsen only used data on people who go to the Twitter.com site, not people who visit using cell phones or desktop widgets.
Overall I'd say this study tells us absolutely nothing.
i can't think of anyexample
Idiot.
81% of the sample (13-18s) knew about Twitter and what it was, 14% had heard of it but weren’t overly clued in, however 3% had no clue whatsoever about Twitter.
48% of the 13-18 year olds already had a Twitter account, with the percentage growing as they get older. The 13-14 age bracket had just 39% with an account, however the 17-18 age bracket registered 54% of them with an account.
How Do Teens Use Twitter?
There’s no set standard for the way teens with an account use Twitter. 34% last posted a tweet more than a fortnight ago, whilst 27% last posted today and 12% yesterday. 15% of those who signed up however have NEVER Tweeted.
25% of respondents Tweet more than 20 times a month, and again usage is higher in the older age bracket with 17% of 13-14’s Tweeting more than 20 times a month, whilst 32% of 17-18 year olds tweet that often.
Who they Follow?
Teenagers follow their friends (80%) most, followed by Celebrities (76%), Funny people (23%), Strangers into the same thing as me (17%), Complete strangers (10%), Random people (9%) and no-one (6%).
The idea of using Twitter to network and have conversations is much more prevalent amongst the older age groupings. Those who follow ‘Strangers into the same thing as me’ number just 4% of 13-14 year olds, whilst 24% of 17-18 year olds follow this grouping.
So privacy is important in the younger demographic, but as they lose their shyness, they switch on to Twitter. We're becoming more aware that the internet is increasing this trend to lose shyness earlier - so be prepared for more Teenage Tweets!
I think it's great that there's finally proof that not all technology trends are driven by children. Finally there is a meaningful internet trend being driven mainly by professionals.
They don't care about what your doing every second of everyday. They have things to do like get drunk, get high, and party.
Thats why they don't tweet.
Because, all the tweeting is mostly done over myspace, a more proficient method of saying what your doing. Without just looking at someone's page. I think they don't do it because, they feel like stalkers.
I think you need to get over your misplaced archetypes of teens, because I think you'll find that since you were a teen (can you remember that far?) People are a lot more accepting of the teens who choose not to waste their lives and brain cells partying so early. So if you'll kindly stop being so judgmental, maybe you an realize that you are wrong.
Oh. And also, just because LESS teens tweet, that doesn't mean no teens tweet at all. This study lumps a HUGE age group together to make a point. I'd like to see a real study.
This is a fun way to mess with my kids by giving them misinformation! I love it!
Knoyce just launched and it has everything you need. Knoyce even has mobile version for the iPhone and iPod @ http://www.knoyce.com/m/ - Go to http://www.knoyce.com to join whats "better than just nice"
Twitter.com GROWTH by age group.
GROWTH.
This statistic IS NOT reflecting the age of twitter users, it is reflecting the growth in certain age groups. I imagine all other social networking sites would be similar. Facebook is receiving an influx of middle aged users as well.
I'm 22 and love twitter for its immediacy of news sharing, but my 18yr old little sister never got around to using Twitter because she mentions "there's no point to it" "who are my friends? i don't see any pictures" and she prefers Facebook.
My thoughts are teenagers find spaces like Facebook and MySpace more interesting because it's filled with imagery, ways to express themselves and connect with others beyond "just a status update".
Whereas Twitter can appeal to the older demographic because it is fast, simple, and perfect for on-the-go mobile users. And won't take too much time, unless you become extremely addicted to trending news :)
Twitter is not good for closed-group socialising between known friends, which is what many young people like.
It *is* good for self-promotion, resource sharing and stranger socialising - which all lend themselves to business. Young people who have something to gain from this - career-minded students, young entrepreneurs, infofreaks - use it, but regular chew-the-cud young people can't see the point.
I find Twitter a very businessy environment. What's going on with this obsession? Are all these business people sat in there thinking "Hey, I'm doing something cool right? That's what the news tells me:Twitter is cool. So where are all the young people?".
They don't want to hang out with you.
Just my idea..
as for Twitter, it will need to evolve. .. add better conversations, pics post, get rid of silly 140 chars limit (show 140 as header, and clickable whole full feature blog post underneath) .... if Twitter wont evolve, people will discover Friendfeed ......
Back to what you said: teens have thoughts and emotions just as any other aged person does. If they don't feel the need to express that, then maybe they should. I know firsthandedly that it's helped me a great lot. 621 Tweets ago i was wishing for something like this.
the reason i don't tweet, because twitter is the lamest most degrading thing on the entire Internet
honestly its worst then myspace and facebook.
Anyway.. I think it's just because we're more into things like MySpace and FaceBook. They have more to do, so most teens probably get bored by twitter because they'll see it simply as updating their status, which they can do on other social networking sites, as well as loads of other things - such as photo albums and quizzes/games and commenting on eachothers "walls
must "You must be 13 years or older to use this site." Full disclosure: I am 13 years old I and I tweet a lot
Most of the media generation is used to follow not only tweets but tv shows and the news reports via twitter.
In my country, Chile, lots of tv shows on public broadcasting are interacting with the audience via twitter, the same with lots of newspapers, some journalists tweet while reporting live on tv news, we have lots of other uses for twitter like broadcast live via twitcam to other twitter followers, there is a generation who is growing with twitter and possibly if you search again in 3 or 5 years more, twitter will be growing in users amount. The aplication is too young for this kind of messures.
I also agree that they don't see this as private as some of the other social networking sites AND that they are just aren't aware that some of their favorite brands/celebs are tweeting.
Don't forget, this is still just a baby and companies are just now learning how to take advantage of this. Soon you will see billboards driving down i90 (apple now owns that entire interstate) telling you to follow @abercrombie for tips to be the sexiest sophmore at Bayside.
Wait until I tell my 15 year old daughter that she & her friends need to get off the Tweeting. I knew they were not needed there clogging up the stream. LOL!
I guess having a child that age, I know several kids that tweet. Also most of the kids I know do not seem to be trying to hide from parental eyes. If they want to hide stuff they use an IM or secret email. Oops, bet I wasn't suppose to know that.
Not many of my peers tweet but enough to have personal jokes session on twitter.
Maybe the reason why teens are not into Twitter because it's so open. Forgive me if I'm being stereotypical about teens but they do tend to be cliquish. Facebook allows them to control their cliques.
It's too open on Twitter.
Simply put, Twitter is now a marketing tool. And children aren't interested in "pimping their product" so to speak. Twitter's not necessarily a "fun and engaging" place. It's simply a marketing tool. I do believe it will expire, as is always the case, and be replaced with yet another trendy marketing tool.
Interestingly, my 14 year old sister has a twitter account. She abandoned it and doesn't use it anymore. She uses other onlne tools to chat with her friends.
I do believe that Twitter relies on a lot of hype and abandoned accounts...and little else.
Hahah, yeah like they can like really like do that, ermmm.... like. ;)
Contrary to that. Assuming they had Twitter accounts & had device updates on, it's actually cheaper to tweet than to text message.
The bigger question is, how many people outside of Mashable's audience (and all of the other tech blog audiences) use Twitter.
The thing about twitter is, to a lot of people, it's a blank slate. You have to work (not very hard mind you) to get followers. You have to be saying something interesting in order to keep them. I love twitter because I'm very spontaneous and i love being able to blurt out whatever I want whenever I want in an instant. & the feeling of instantly connecting with MILLIONS of people around the world is amazing.
I've even tried to get my friends to join Twitter they dont "get it". I try to explain, I basicly sell a product but the usual response is "Why not just use facebook".
I usually give up there.
My excitment over google analytics usually compares to there's of beer pong and clubbing. So maybe I'm just in the wrong boat :).
There's also the issue that teens don't necessarily have as much computer/phone access. Though obviously this changes once people hit college, in high school and such social media sites tend to be blocked, and people don't necessarily have smart phones capable of accessing Twitter on the go. If that's all one's updating, it doesn't seem like as critical an app.
Just assume that the 1/4 rate between the twitting percents of people under 25 (couldn't avoid laughing at the 2 (!) year old limit of the first category...) over those from 25 to 54 plainly denotes that this difference wouldn't be so dramatic if the down limit of the sample has been shifted to 10 yearold users.
Also: Twitter, as oposed to previous relational environments, is focused primarily in statement rather than in image, so presuming a minimum of opinion, information and articulated discourse - clearly not among the competences in which media teens generally excell.
Augusto Maurer
Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
www.antaresmusica.com.br
Whoops sorry for the spam, too stupid to check if it had actually posted.
And I don't understand how there are more people over 55 on Twitter than people under 25...
mostly because they can't be fucked get it and it yet another web-site they'll be checking everyday
Teens tend to pick other social networks because by average they seek to satisfy the needs for communication, sexual attraction and chilling out. That said, twitter doesn't provide photo album and even if they try hard to meet some girl/boy using messaging, it doesn't even reach IM levels.
But to avoid confusion, what I am talking about is based by personal experience. Thus, teens that don't have time to twitter due to work overdose will eventually use it when they'll derive fruits from their current hardship, to promote themselves and, eventually reach the next level of the social networking.
If they want teens to start using twitter there needs to be a new benefit for them that they can't find somewhere else.
I'd point you towards the young people (all under 24) speaking at Tomorrow's Web conference in London this weekend http://tomorrowswebconf.com/speakers ALL of whom have Twitter accounts.
But, those are tech geek young people, you say? Well, proportionally, I'd say there were many more tech geek people using twitter (and I mean USING it, not signing up because Oprah and Stephen Fry did, then never use it) than any other demographic.
I'll be attending the Tomorrow's Web conference as part of trying to find out more about the future of the web from those in the future's driving seat - and hoping they'll engage with the BBC open source documentary production about the web http://www.bbc.co.uk/digitalrevolution/
Will make a point of asking them about the role of twitter in their lives and projects.
~danb
Chemiker mit Dipl. leider nur Arbeitslos wegen dem Chaos das hier herrscht. Ich kann nicht good Englisch. Aber aber weißt Du was z.B. Kaliumpermanganat ist oder sonstiges? Also wenn du mich schon nicht ausstehen kannst dann lasse deine zynischen bemerkungen . So etwas macht man nicht . Das ist als würdest du auf jemanden Einschlagen , der schon am Boden liegt. Ich habe in einigen büchern immer wieder gelesen das ist als Marketingexperte (der aller Beste) mehr Psychologibücher lesen anstatt Mickymouse . Ausserdem kommst du NUR Arrogant und Überheblich rüber. Bist Du etwa ein Kaiser? Es Heist : wer andere Menschen führen will , muss lernen hinter ihnen zu laufen. Sollte ich irgend etwas falsch verstanden haben so entschuldige ich mich. Aber diesen Eindruck hast du nunmal bei mir hinterlassen. Soooooo Das war das Wort zum Sonntag.-!
Negation: I am a teen, and I tweet.
Chemiker mit Dipl. leider nur Arbeitslos wegen dem Chaos das hier herrscht. Ich kann nicht good Englisch. Aber aber weißt Du was z.B. Kaliumpermanganat ist oder sonstiges? Also wenn du mich schon nicht ausstehen kannst dann lasse deine zynischen bemerkungen . So etwas macht man nicht . Das ist als würdest du auf jemanden Einschlagen , der schon am Boden liegt. Ich habe in einigen büchern immer wieder gelesen das ist als Marketingexperte (der aller Beste) mehr Psychologibücher lesen anstatt Mickymouse . Ausserdem kommst du NUR Arrogant und Überheblich rüber. Bist Du etwa ein Kaiser? Es Heist : wer andere Menschen führen will , muss lernen hinter ihnen zu laufen. Sollte ich irgend etwas falsch verstanden haben so entschuldige ich mich. Aber diesen Eindruck hast du nunmal bei mir hinterlassen. Soooooo Das war das Wort zum Sonntag.-!
Give our teens time and have faith. They'll soon grow into bright, young-adult internet marketers, ready to seize consumers by the throat through the intertoobs.
my initial thoughts.
Also, it's easier to share our personal content with our friends on Facebook (i.e. pictures, videos, links) and because that's what teens want to do at our age, Facebook dominates Twitter.
--ConnorJack
For us oldies who still like our keyboards, mice etc it's a different matter of course....
--ConnorJack
We're truly a self obsessed society aren't we? I hope we can pry our eyes away from ourselves long enough to be able to actually have a LOOK at ourselves!
While not scientific, my "little" survey was enough to convince me that teens don't tweet. It was also enough to keep me off twitter and to report in my own blog that twitter wouldn't last long (idea being that if kids are doing something on the internet, then it won't last long)
My view about Twitter changed when Mashable recently updated a story on twitter accounts showing up higher in search results than websites. This and studying how Obama used twitter in his election campaign, seeing Bruno lose money at least in part due to tweets, and seeing the backlash against MS and IE6 recently (also started by Mashable). Considering all this I think Twitter is going to keep growing.
As for why kids aren't using Twitter...I think it is because they are texting. Text has everything they need without lugging around a computer. For social networking online, they turn to MySpace.
I'm not sure how accurate this study is since it left out a huge group of users but let's assume it is for now. I see several reasons why twitter might be more interesting for grown ups (I refuse ro refer to myself as old yet) than for teenagers.
Fore once facebook and myspace have been around a little longer than twitter and become quite popular. so I guess lots of teenagers simply found there something that works for them and are not too thrilled by twitter. why fix something that's not broken?
Next, the old twitter start page explicitily mentioned parents and co-workers. must have sounded rather deterring for teens if they didn't know much about the site. whereas older people might get interested in something that says: hey, look at me, I'm useful.
aside from that twitter doesn't ask you to share everything about you when you start. you don't get the feeling that you have to create a page that exposes your whole life. you can just start reading, get used to it, participate later on your own terms. this step by step entry makes it easy for adults to start something new if they haven't been into social media before.
Even if you considered 13-24 as the realistic age range for response - 16%/(13-24)yrs = 1.45x wherease 64%/(25-54) = 2.2x.
In numbers, 13-24 yr olds are 53.1m vs 25-54 yr olds @ 127.5m. That means there are 2.4x more 25-54 yr olds than measurable 13-24 yr olds.
In short, poor reporting by Nielsen - they have used this data to skew a message which is partly true but not to the degree reported.
Not a major difference and I would add from the trends, that the gap is closing fast.
I'm not sure this affects Twitter at all, honestly; I think it's catching on to teens and will continue to. I guess we'll see!
twitter has been completely genus from the very beginning and they should not alter it just for the sake of involving a crowd of mindless uninteractive teens.
It's a fad, any fool can see that. 15 to 10 years ago we had IRC, who uses that now? And you really think that in 10 to 15 years from now we'll still be using Twitter?!? Get real.
Oh look, there's the emperor! I read on a blog yesterday he's wearing his new suit. Must be true then.
http://spare-a-talent.blogspot.com
You also seem to be proving my theory correct with your argument: Teens are known for "fads" (you said), Twitter is a fad (you seem to imply), Twitter is a growing fad (I agree)... but eventually all fads die out. You really think that in 10 to 15 years from now we'll still be using Twitter?!?
I'm not bashing anyone or anything, except Twitter. I'm just poking fun at people who can't see that the emporer is actually naked!!!
My guess would be that Facebook has more functionalities on top that are more appealing for teens...
twitter has been completely genus from the very beginning and they should not alter it just for the sake of involving a crowd of mindless uninteractive teens.
Yet, on the other hand, before graduating, I remember that most of my fellow seniors did not really understand the full potential of Twitter, and only focused on the fact that you get to see exactly when someone is eating a sandwich, or whatever; which, to some people I talked to, seemed over the top -- almost too much information. They didn't seem to get that there is much more to Twitter than that. I'd be willing to bet that I was the only person in my class to actively use Twitter (it's a small school; my class was 150-ish, my still).
I think that as even more info about Twitter gets out, and teens look for new things besides MySpace and Facebook, they will maybe get more into it.
In my opinion, teens prefer to stick to Facebook because Facebook allows them to post pictures, converse with others, fill out silly notes, etc. My mom has a Facebook, and most of my friends' parents have them, but they don't really post many pictures or anything, they just update their statuses and check others' pictures.
Teens like the idea of showing off. We won't admit it, but even I used to use my Facebook for the sole purpose of: LOOK AT HOW CUTE I AM!! LOOK AT HOW FUNNY I AM!!! LOOK AT HOW GOOD MY TASTE IN MUSIC IS!!
Teens also don't like the idea of becoming a little fish, which is sort of what Twitter is. They can't deal with subscribing to hundreds of Tweet-ers (Twitter-ers? Birds?) and getting perhaps two followers.
It's an attention thing.
I kept up Twitter because it boosted interest in my dA (deviantART) gallery, and my video blog on YouTube, and also because I thought it was an amazing idea and a great way to 'stay in touch' with the world, I guess you could say. Many teenagers wouldn't have the same need to do this, and instead of broadcasting into pure nothingless (with usually, pure nothingless) they can easily take comfort into letting other people what their doing through sites such as Facebook, Bebo etc., and also their audience there is compiled of usually friends and relatives that they know. Timelines/status messages on such sites doesn't feel as distant on Twitter usually, as when you update people on what you're doing on such sites, at least someone you know will read it and perhaps even comment. On Twitter, it is, at the end of the day, blatant self-confirmation when you start from the very start, having very little or no audience at all. You could even say that that actually is pretty scary thought for any teenager, having no confirmation or acceptance from anyone else out there.
...but I still love you Twitter. mwah.
I kept up Twitter because it boosted interest in my dA (deviantART) gallery, and my video blog on YouTube, and also because I thought it was an amazing idea and a great way to 'stay in touch' with the world, I guess you could say. Many teenagers wouldn't have the same need to do this, and instead of broadcasting into pure nothingless (with usually, pure nothingless) they can easily take comfort into letting other people what their doing through sites such as Facebook, Bebo etc., and also their audience there is compiled of usually friends and relatives that they know. Timelines/status messages on such sites doesn't feel as distant on Twitter usually, as when you update people on what you're doing on such sites, at least someone you know will read it and perhaps even comment. On Twitter, it is, at the end of the day, blatant self-confirmation when you start from the very start, having very little or no audience at all. You could even say that that actually is pretty scary thought for any teenager, having no confirmation or acceptance from anyone else out there.
...but I still love you Twitter. mwah.
I kept up Twitter because it boosted interest in my dA (deviantART) gallery, and my video blog on YouTube, and also because I thought it was an amazing idea and a great way to 'stay in touch' with the world, I guess you could say. Many teenagers wouldn't have the same need to do this, and instead of broadcasting into pure nothingless (with usually, pure nothingless) they can easily take comfort into letting other people what their doing through sites such as Facebook, Bebo etc., and also their audience there is compiled of usually friends and relatives that they know. Timelines/status messages on such sites doesn't feel as distant on Twitter usually, as when you update people on what you're doing on such sites, at least someone you know will read it and perhaps even comment. On Twitter, it is, at the end of the day, blatant self-confirmation when you start from the very start, having very little or no audience at all. You could even say that that actually is pretty scary thought for any teenager, having no confirmation or acceptance from anyone else out there.
...but I still love you Twitter. mwah.
I kept up Twitter because it boosted interest in my dA (deviantART) gallery, and my video blog on YouTube, and also because I thought it was an amazing idea and a great way to 'stay in touch' with the world, I guess you could say. Many teenagers wouldn't have the same need to do this, and instead of broadcasting into pure nothingless (with usually, pure nothingless) they can easily take comfort into letting other people what their doing through sites such as Facebook, Bebo etc., and also their audience there is compiled of usually friends and relatives that they know. Timelines/status messages on such sites doesn't feel as distant on Twitter usually, as when you update people on what you're doing on such sites, at least someone you know will read it and perhaps even comment. On Twitter, it is, at the end of the day, blatant self-confirmation when you start from the very start, having very little or no audience at all. You could even say that that actually is pretty scary thought for any teenager, having no confirmation or acceptance from anyone else out there.
...but I still love you Twitter. mwah.
I kept up Twitter because it boosted interest in my dA (deviantART) gallery, and my video blog on YouTube, and also because I thought it was an amazing idea and a great way to 'stay in touch' with the world, I guess you could say. Many teenagers wouldn't have the same need to do this, and instead of broadcasting into pure nothingless (with usually, pure nothingless) they can easily take comfort into letting other people what their doing through sites such as Facebook, Bebo etc., and also their audience there is compiled of usually friends and relatives that they know. Timelines/status messages on such sites doesn't feel as distant on Twitter usually, as when you update people on what you're doing on such sites, at least someone you know will read it and perhaps even comment. On Twitter, it is, at the end of the day, blatant self-confirmation when you start from the very start, having very little or no audience at all. You could even say that that actually is pretty scary thought for any teenager, having no confirmation or acceptance from anyone else out there.
...but I still love you Twitter. mwah.
Also, when you're a teen you are not that interested in what other people are doing, so why would you want to know what they are up to every ten minutes? I'm not at all surprised by this stat.
The second reason is their world is smaller. They have their circle of friends within their texting universe.
Look out though - when these teens enter the workforce, I expect their texting skills will only serve to reinforce the use of this type of network.
The second reason is their world is smaller. They have their circle of friends within their texting universe.
Look out though - when these teens enter the workforce, I expect their texting skills will only serve to reinforce the use of this type of network.
The second reason is their world is smaller. They have their circle of friends within their texting universe.
Look out though - when these teens enter the workforce, I expect their texting skills will only serve to reinforce the use of this type of network.
One Year Ago --> http://www.quibblo.com/quiz/1pVdK5N/Are-you-a-m...
A Couple Of Months Ago --> http://www.quibblo.com/quiz/9WWIbL0/Do-you-Twitter
We've seen it go from 91% non-usage, to 57% non-usage. And for what it is worth, our site (Quibblo.com) is made up entirely of teens.
Additionally - I wonder if there is any "group" usage, i.e. some teens tweeting back and forth en masse (since it's rare they spend their freetime alone by choice).
Parental supervision/censorship of kids on social media/interet is still quite prevalent, and I would imagine this still has an impact. Still - kids who are savvier tend to find access, and I wonder if these are the trendsetters that are more influential in their group in terms of psychographics.
Any insights from that perspective?
1. teenagers are 13-19 year olds. not 2-24 year olds.
2. how many 2 year olds can tweet? maybe 10 year olds at the youngest! but you have to be 13 to be on twitter! right? so why on earth is that age band 2-24 when only 13+'s can tweet? LOL FAIL.
3. the age groups are odd sizes! 2-24 (well, 13-24, really) then 25-54! OF COURSE theres going to be more in an age group which is bigger!
haha, nice work whoever made those stats.
The essential functionality of Twitter is undeniable (not to be confused with the content). That is, in my humble opinion, what will enable Twitter to continue to grow and become one of several means by which we communicate and share.
The essential functionality of Twitter is undeniable (not to be confused with the content). That is, in my humble opinion, what will enable Twitter to continue to grow and become one of several means by which we communicate and share.
Rebecca
Word Nerd
Ms Twitter UK.
@rebeccawoodhead
Twitter is for narcissistic geeks/losers who think people are actually interested in their mundane activities and lives. Nobody really gives a ---- how you feel right this instant or that you just had a bagel.
---------------------------------
Why have you deleted his post, when in fact he's hit the nail right on the head! Mike I applaud you!!!
It seems like nobody who can see through the Twitter myth is allowed to post their opinion. I too had a comment removed recently and I was saying almost exactly the same thing.
The best is that Mike's comment is not only true, but backed up by the hundreds of kiddies posting here to tell us they use Twitter... Kids, you paid attention in stats lessons didn't you? 16% of "lots and lots and lots (of internet users)" is approximately "quite a lot (of internet users)". To put it another way, if you are under 25, the probability that you use Twitter, is roughly double the probability of catching that gutshot straight on the river (itself, a probability held hight by many teenage poker fish).
In other words: only narcissistic geeks/losers who think people are actually interested in their mundane activities and lives, would post here to say "I use Twitter", despite the relatively high probability!!!
Teens wants extendable services and renewing services. Twitter is static in that matter and is not apealing to teens but it sure is for adults.
- "MySpace and Facebook already offer Status Updates along with their other features, so why bother?"
- "Why join if I would be the only one of my friends that uses it?"
I'm not even sure if I have 5 teenage friends that use Twitter actively. I have encouraged a few to join, but they either don't understand the service or care enough to try.
This would tell a much more interesting story and highlight that the people on Twitter in every demographic group, are early-adopters and thought-leaders who are well-informed, helpful and play well with others. Perhaps Nielsen could look at Twitter from the perspective of consumer behavior groupings, instead of demographic groups.
Anyone who puts their thoughts into public words, whether on screen or not, is being narcissistic in that they are sufficiently convinced of the interesting nature of their thoughts to think others will find them interesting. The reverse is also true. Sometimes, to start a conversation, you have to make the first move and state your opinion. The result can be that you learn something by listening to or reading the opinions of others.
I think Twitter is most interesting when it is about sharing ideas. If you follow people you find interesting then your experience of twitter will be interesting.
I actually find the 'teen' statistic surprising. I'm curious to know why that is the case, if this is an accurate stat. If you have any views you'd like to share about it (i.e. don't just swear and run away) then feel free to tweet me.
Rebecca
@rebeccawoodhead
http://spare-a-talent.blogspot.com
http://spare-a-talent.blogspot.com
I personally think teens are twitter shy mainly because you can do more things on facebook & myspace. I think they're more personal websites to communicate to people you know.
I also think that when a teenager creates a twitter account they think they have really interesting things to say & think loadsa people are gonna automatically follow them, but it doesn't really work like that unless you're Britney Spears or work on Eastenders.
Plus sometimes when people start a twitter account you can feel a bit lost & so then the teenager most probs cbb to sit & work out how to use it & really get into it.
Jus saying ^^
Nielsen is out of touch. Most of the ppl I know who Tweet do so from some mobile device. I don't know anyone who actually Tweets from twitter.com. May be next time Nielsen will do some research that's actually valid.
I think most of my friends don't tweet becasue they'd rather use sites like Bebo which is rapidly going downhill anyway.Twitter is the future!It's good because it's simple and with just about every celebrity using it, it's more likely to stick around longer than Bebo. I don't know, I guess some people just don't have that much to say about themselves which is what Twitter is all about.
This survey assumes that all twitter users are in front of a computer. Having many related teens in my life I can tell you that few of them have time to sit in front of a computer screen, and most spend all of their time on their mobile device. Without those stats I don't think you can make a fair assessment on that demographic.
www.celsoricardo.com
www.twitter.com/blogBCR
They don't care about what your doing every second of everyday. They have things to do like get drunk, get high, and party.
Thats why they don't tweet.
Because, all the tweeting is mostly done over myspace, a more proficient method of saying what your doing. Without just looking at someone's page. I think they don't do it because, they feel like stalkers.
The evidence is right here in the comments, teens DO tweet.
i guess i don't really get the whole purpose, but i've been using it doe awhile now. and i enjoy it.
However, I love to tweet. I use it more than Facebook most of the time.
-Zachary Collins
http://www.yazzem.com
P.S. Not for me to gain any fame, but you should write a post featuring some teen tweople.
Just look at how users were categorized : 2-24, 25-54 and 55+. I believe this means that most of all internet users actually fit in the seconth category.
24 - 2 = 22 years of age range
54 - 25 = 29 years of age range
Already, you are comparing age ranges that can't be compared, because they are not the same size. Your statistics are already biased.
Then, if you consider age 2-22, it is not really 2-22, because I am not quite sure that a lot of 2 years old babies use internet and can actually answer to any web-related question. Or any question whatsoever. This mean, really, the categories could have been : 12-24 (age range of 12), 25-54 (age range of 29) and 55 +.
The biased categories would then have obviously looked alot more irrelevant.
Category 2 (age 25-54) does represent much more than 33% of internet users, which means the huge bar with a big 64% doesn't mean that Twitter is "hip" for adults and professional and almost useless for teens.. Just that twitter users might actually be much like any internet user, overall.
This chart says what the big title wants it to say. That's it.
Though, I would be interested in a serious inquiry, that might as well or not come with a conclusion that teens seem to be less enthousiastics about Twitter than older people.
As for this report, I consider it not very good.
Also why not 2-18, 19-25, 25-55, 55+ ? This more accurately reflects social breakdowns for users (high school, college, post-college workforce, etc) there has been speculation that FB and other socnet usage peaks for 30somethings because they are tied to computers at work all day.
I think the age brackets need to be broken down even further. First off, leave out children under 10. Are they really relevant to the study? I'm thinking 5 year spans would be better. 10-14, 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, etc, etc. AND, find a way to open up the survey to include users who use their phones or other means for posting their tweets. Sure, this type of study would be more labor intensive, but it would yield better results, in my humble opinion.
But for all I know, the results would likely be the same. But at least the study would be more scientifically sound. It seems as though due diligence is something that is so very lacking nowadays.
Twitter is fun, but none of my friends have a twitter. Only my family does.
All of my aunts and uncles and cousins use twitter for little updates, so we don't have to call everyone about it. We can just tweet it! It's a lot easier. I love twitter! It's my addiction.
Twitter is fun, but none of my friends have a twitter. Only my family does.
All of my aunts and uncles and cousins use twitter for little updates, so we don't have to call everyone about it. We can just tweet it! It's a lot easier. I love twitter! It's my addiction.
DK
MediaSnackers Founding Director
mediasnackers.com
Nielsen is only looking at website visitation and tweetdeck data, both of which would overindex for older visitors, because younger people are more likely to use their mobile handsets and/or not use secondary applications.
We recently fielded some research for TWTRCON-SF that shows that those 13-17 are utilizing Twitter at the same rates of those 18-34. (In the U.S., there's also less teens than those 18-34, which is why teens or those 13-17 always tend to comprise a smaller percentage of users.)
You can find more at thinktank8.com/research
Doesn't seem that strange to me...70% of the traffic to our YouTube channel is over 34
Teens do not have judgment yet and cannot form an opinion. Not all teens R creating equally as some R great twitters and an exception to the rule or stat. Im 26 and just nudge this stats - ppl call me weird for using Twitter - well when u come from a city that has a population density of 60% on Facebook and with an economy in the dirt, I guess in that reality, I am weird. ~ I guess time will tell.
It interesting how Facebook vs Twitter R really different. See with Facebook, the majority of its ealry adopters were 18-25 whereas Twitter is different - Funny the way it is how many ppl still say Twitter? - isnt that just another Facebook. - I think ppl with these opinons fall into the teens dont get it category even if they R over 25.
I remember reading a TIME article about how the new 18 was 25. No offense to 18 yr olds, but individuals these days dont care about the future how 18 yr olds did 40 yrs ago - if they did, they would be on Twitter right away!
Botton line, in my opinion, teens these days have no judegment which formulates into no ideas as there is a lot of competing resources, media, gadets tools extra - so they waste their time on Facebook ...proof? - look at Google Trends on the weekend for Facebook google searches and u will see spikes in trends.
Given that Twitter's old motto is "What ur doing?'", teens will just do that on Facebook, the time waster. Now that Twitter is changing their motto and site design, may chg teens perception.
Bottom LINE: 1 idea: Twitter has to be in the classroom for Teens to get it!
Quick Rambles....cannot use my disqus or twitter acct to comment :(
I'd also like to add that I prefer Twitter MUCH MORE to websites like facebook and myspace, because they are really different. A lot of teens just like to look cool and have a billion friends on facebook/myspace and, put up those pictures that make them look cool/funny/exceptionally good-looking. I honestly don't give a crap about that kind of stuff. Sure, Twitter sounds weird at first, "What? You follow people? Isn't that like stalking?" But really it's a lot less intrusive than other social networking sites. I read about people thoughts, etc. in usually less than 140 characters, occasionally see quiz results and pictures. But that's it. And I can stop following anyone whenever the heck I want. So if someone turns out to be really annoying, I can just unfollow them and they very likely won't even notice.
And to be honest, Twitter is really the only way I find out about the news, except for a podcast that I listen to. So maybe it is the more tech-savvy/geeky teens using Twitter, but we ARE tweeting, whether it interests older people or not. Really, I don't care about companies/mildly famous people using Twitter to promote themselves, so it's mutual.
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/15739
I saw a quote on tobacco I think might apply to this phenomenon.
Something like, "the great illusion of smoking tobacco is that you're doing something."
and I forget who that is by, and you're welcome.
There are a lot of factors involved in lower adoption that many of the readers have already pointed out -- kids aren't at their computers all day, they are not selling anything etc.
However, based on my estimates using the information provided in the chart, it appears that the youth market is actually adopting Twitter at an accelerated pace. They have gone from comprising about 6% of the Twitter users in January to 16% in June as shown by Nielsen. So, from where I stand, the youth market is actually hot in terms of Twitter adoption rates. I've posted the analysis on my blog for anyone who wants to look at the calculations.
And if you watch shows like Conan O'brien, whenever Twitter is mentioned the whole audience boos. That must tell you something! I'm sure the reason why there is more comments on here disagreeing with the study is because this article was posted somewhere on Twitter, so everyone who uses Twitter came here to gawk. The rest of the young people haven't seen this, or just don't care.
Maybe they should have asked him for comment...
Can't wait until it dies out.
It's not that teens aren't on Twitter. They've heard the buzz and they're definitely there, it's that they're passive observers on Twitter. They came for the celebrities, hooked up to their friends' accountants and then the interaction stagnated. In the teen world Twitter is more of a feature type item then a full fledged site. They'd rather be on Facebook and status message suit them fine.
This is primary, on the ground research. Trendsta engages with teens every day in their space and definitely see a full perspective of how they use various platforms, networks, etc. Stop with the teens aren't on Twitter. It's an inaccurate blanketing statement.
With notable exceptions, the vast majority of teens care far less about news and current events than they do about their FRIENDS and what they are doing. That's what Facebook (and myspace) are designed to do... and do it SO much better than twitter. They are actual "social networks". Twitter is a web2.0 version of an RSS reader.
Tiffany N
Owner, TwitterMamas.net
Tiffany N
Owner, TwitterMamas.net
So yes, older people still use desktop interface to access twitter. No one will argue, but seriously, it's a mobile technology that young people use in a mobile setting. Teens use twitter, just not from their desktop computers.
Highlight: The most salient visceral reaction that I got when looking at the teens' Twitter streams was that teens on Twitter seemed to fit into three categories: 1) geeky teens, tech teens, fandom teens, machinema teens; 2) teens who are in love with the Jonas Brothers/Miley Cyrus, musicians, or another category of celebs; 3) multi-lingual foreign teens with friends/followers around the world who seemed to participate in lots of online communities.
I think these rating have always been a bit wonky.
http://philanthrophile.wordpress.com/2009/08/07...
My generation are from the dot.com boom and crash era, and although many of us tweet and facebook, email is still our primary method of communication and ecommerce is still our primary focus of the ventures we launch on the internet.
Tipping (point) my hat to Malcom Gladwell at this stage, this is perfectly explainable just as there is nothing coincidental about the fact the CEO of Facebook and the CEO of this site (one of social networking's most ardent cheerleaders) were born just over a year apart.
They were both far too young to get involved in building dot.com's (or reporting on dot.coms). Had they been born 10(ish) years earlier then Zuckerberg would have founded Amazon and Cashmore would be the editor of Fast Company (or that crazy dot.com news site and RW mag that was swimming in, nevermind drinking, the kool aid).
Instead they came of age in a post-Cluetrain era, and have ridden the wave of web 2.0 like many others of their generation. Unlike my generation they read the manifesto (or consumed other media influenced by it) and truly "got" it because unlike me and my generation they no interest (financial or intellectual) in anything that had gone before, no status quo to protect.
And so they are the dominant generation of our times, which brings with it great wealth and great influence. However, it also brings with it a great certainty in the end of history. A belief that their model of things (i.e. commerce and society) is the last one that will ever be needed.
They are wrong. The drumbeat continues...
There is already a group of 13-15 year old kids who don't yet know each other, but who are starting to think so far beyond the likes of Facebook and Twitter that it will take this current generation every bit as long to comprehend whatever it is that these kids come up with, as it has taken my generation of dinosaurs to "get" social networking.
And Zuckerberg will wake up to find that, in whatever new paradigm emerges, he has become Bill Gates and Cashmore will discover he is now John Dvorak.
So to restate the title of this post: Teen's Don't Tweet... Duh, of course they f*cking don't grandpa...
Just look at the trending topics right now... I honestly don't think people over 25 give a flying crap about the Jonas Brothers. Hell, I'm 18 and I'm too old for them
However, teens are most likely to participate by texting from their cell phones, so I don't think these #'s are accurate w/o some measure of that participation.
Being a teen myself [17, if you must know.]
I know for a fact that currently, teenagers prefer facebook.
I've noticed we go through a wave of different social networking sites.
But because teens prefer facebook, hardly any of our friends are on twitter, leading teenagers to create an account but never use it, and really it's just a cycle.
I myself don't actually use twitter. Sure, I log on, but I follow celebs, thats it. Find out what they're doing and log out.
Also, twitter is great for people you don’t know, unlike FaceBook, which is more for people you know. They both have a significant place in the internet world, and I think Twitter will only continue gaining prominence with all ages.
Capo 4!!!!
This headline reflects the same kinds of assumptions that resulted in the "Dewey Wins" for the 1948 Presidential election.
Meanwhile, people who do see the real beauty and simplicity of Twitter are those that run a website, forum, blog, or otherwise have some sort of community or fandom surrounding them. Teens have already built a network - but on Facebook/MySpace, not Twitter. Teens consider Twitter a bit of a joke, such as "who has the most followers", not who has the most interesting tweets.
And yes, I'm a teen. I tried to get my friends to join it, but it didn't work. I don't use Twitter for personal use, it's more of a way to connect to people online who I *don't* know, who offer interesting quotes and tidbits of trivia that my friends would find boring. Twitter is for making friends, not importing them from Facebook.